Simulation analysis of thermal insulation performance of diesel engine piston based on PEO and La 2 Zr 2 O 7 thermal barrier coating

In this research, we explored the application of ' thermal swing ' thermal barrier coatings (TBCs) in diesel engines, aiming to surpass the performance of conventional TBCs. Traditional TBCs often suffer from limitations like consistently high surface temperatures and a delayed response to sudden variations in cylinder temperatures, which adversely impact engine efficiency. To overcome these challenges, plasma electrolytic oxidation (PEO) technology was employed to engineer TBCs with the sought-after ' thermal swing ' feature. Comparative simulations were conducted to assess the thermal characteristics of PEO coatings on pistons, in contrast to standard La 2 Zr 2 O 7 coatings. The steady-state thermal analysis revealed that PEO coatings maintained a lower peak temperature compared to La 2 Zr 2 O 7 coatings under similar thermal insulation conditions, indicating a superior ability of the PEO coatings in heat dissipation and in sustaining lower surface temperatures. In the transient thermal analysis, focusing on temporal temperature variations, the PEO coatings exhibited a markedly quicker and more robust response to cylinder temperature fluctuations. This indicates that PEO coatings are highly effective in adapting swiftly to temperature changes, thereby contributing to enhanced engine performance. Additionally, the PEO coating demonstrated a notable reduction in the end temperature (TE), which is crucial for mitigating the heating effect on intake gas, in comparison to La 2 Zr 2 O 7 coatings with equivalent thermal insulation properties. However, it was observed that this advantage significantly decreased when the PEO coating thickness surpassed 0.3 mm. Drawing from these observations, it is concluded that PEO coatings hold several thermal advantages over La 2 Zr 2 O 7 coatings, particularly in terms of thermal load management and responsiveness to in-cylinder temperature shifts. These benefits are most pronounced when the PEO coating maintains a thickness below 0.3 mm.