Fiberglass as a Novel Building Material: A Life Cycle Assessment of a Pilot House

被引:2
作者
Bjanesoy, Stavroula [1 ]
Heinonen, Jukka [1 ]
Ogmundarson, Olafur [2 ]
Arnadottir, Arora [1 ]
Marteinsson, Bjoern [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iceland, Fac Civil & Environm Engn, Hjardarhagi 2-6, IS-107 Reykjavik, Iceland
[2] Univ Iceland, Fac Food Sci & Nutr, Aragata 14, IS-102 Reykjavik, Iceland
来源
ARCHITECTURE-SWITZERLAND | 2022年 / 2卷 / 04期
关键词
fiberglass; life cycle assessment (LCA); alternative building materials; sustainable built environment; embodied emissions; hotspot analysis; uncertainty; RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS; CONSTRUCTION SECTOR; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; CARBON-DIOXIDE; LCA; EMISSIONS; UNCERTAINTY; PERFORMANCE; SELECTION; PHASE;
D O I
10.3390/architecture2040037
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Alternative building materials have the potential to reduce environmental pressure from buildings, though the use of these materials should be guided by an understanding of the embodied environmental impacts. Extensive research on embodied greenhouse gas emissions from buildings has been conducted, but other impacts are less frequently reported. Furthermore, uncertainty is rarely reported in building LCA studies. This paper provides a piece for filling those gaps by comprehensively reporting the embodied environmental impacts of a fiberglass house within the LCA framework, modeled in the OpenLCA software using the Ecoinvent 3.7.1 inventory database. The ReCiPe 2016 impact assessment method is used to report a wide range of environmental impacts. The global warming potential is calculated to be 311 kgCO2 eq/m2. Additionally, a hotspot analysis is included to identify areas that should be the focus for improvement, as well as an uncertainty analysis based on Monte Carlo. The embodied emissions are given context by a scenario analysis over a 50-year use phase in three different grid conditions and with two different energy efficiency levels. Based on the results of this study, it is determined that fiberglass does not provide a viable alternative to conventional building materials if the purpose is to reduce embodied emissions from buildings.
引用
收藏
页码:690 / 710
页数:21
相关论文
共 79 条
  • [71] High-Rise Timber Buildings as a Climate Change Mitigation Measure - A Comparative LCA of Structural System Alternatives
    Skullestad, Julie Lyslo
    Bohne, Rolf Andre
    Lohne, Jardar
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE BUILT ENVIRONMENT TALLINN AND HELSINKI CONFERENCE SBE16 BUILD GREEN AND RENOVATE DEEP, 2016, 96 : 112 - 123
  • [72] The trajectory of the Anthropocene: The Great Acceleration
    Steffen, Will
    Broadgate, Wendy
    Deutsch, Lisa
    Gaffney, Owen
    Ludwig, Cornelia
    [J]. ANTHROPOCENE REVIEW, 2015, 2 (01) : 81 - 98
  • [73] System boundary selection in life-cycle inventories using hybrid approaches
    Suh, S
    Lenzen, M
    Treloar, GJ
    Hondo, H
    Horvath, A
    Huppes, G
    Jolliet, O
    Klann, U
    Krewitt, W
    Moriguchi, Y
    Munksgaard, J
    Norris, G
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 38 (03) : 657 - 664
  • [74] A multidisciplinary approach to sustainable building material selection: A case study in a Finnish context
    Takano, Atsushi
    Hughes, Mark
    Winter, Stefan
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 82 : 526 - 535
  • [75] Teh S.H., 2018, Journal of Economic Structures, V7, P13, DOI DOI 10.1186/S40008-018-0112-4
  • [76] United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2006, Life Cycle Assessment: Principals and Practice, P4
  • [77] Life cycle inventory of buildings: A contribution analysis
    Verbeeck, G.
    Hens, H.
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 45 (04) : 964 - 967
  • [78] A review of Net Zero Energy Buildings with reflections on the Australian context
    Wells, Louise
    Rismanchi, Behzad
    Aye, Lu
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2018, 158 : 616 - 628
  • [79] The USEtox story: a survey of model developer visions and user requirements
    Westh, Torbjorn Bochsen
    Hauschild, Michael Zwicky
    Birkved, Morten
    Jorgensen, Michael Sogaard
    Rosenbaum, Ralph K.
    Fantke, Peter
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2015, 20 (02) : 299 - 310