Trust in Human-Agent Teams: A Multilevel Perspective and Future Research Agenda

被引:2
作者
Wildman, Jessica L. [1 ,4 ]
Nguyen, Daniel [2 ]
Thayer, Amanda L. [1 ]
Robbins-Roth, Valerie T. [2 ]
Carroll, Meredith [3 ]
Carmody, Kendall [2 ]
Ficke, Cherrise [2 ]
Akib, Mohammed [2 ]
Addis, Arianna [2 ]
机构
[1] Florida Inst Technol, Psychol Program, Ind Org IO, Melbourne, FL 32901 USA
[2] Florida Inst Technol, Melbourne, FL 32901 USA
[3] Florida Inst Technol, Coll Aeronaut, Adv Technol Interact & Learning Aviat Syst ATLAS L, Melbourne, FL 32901 USA
[4] Florida Inst Technol, 150 W Univ Blvd, Melbourne, FL 32901 USA
关键词
groups/teams; job attitudes/beliefs/values; agents; artificial intelligence; trust; PERCEIVED TRUSTWORTHINESS; SOCIAL CATEGORIZATION; AUTOMATION; PERFORMANCE; AUTONOMY; METAANALYSIS; MODEL; INTERDEPENDENCE; COOPERATION; PROPENSITY;
D O I
10.1177/20413866241253278
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
As technology continues to advance, interest in how humans perceive and interact with autonomous agents has increased, spurring ample research within human-agent teams (HATs). However, the word team is a bit of a misnomer, in that much of this research has examined one human in relation to one agent. We extend the HAT literature by applying a multilevel lens to develop future research questions regarding trust in heterogeneous HATs. First, we assert that trust is an attitude that is multireferent, suggesting research should explore not just humans' trust in agents, but many other perspectives such as agents' trust in humans. Second, we assert that trust is multilevel, suggesting research should explore higher-level emergent forms of trust. Third and fourth, we assert trust is dynamic and event-based, suggesting research should explore discontinuous changes in trust in response to events such as agent- and human-enacted trust violation and repair.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 402
页数:30
相关论文
共 124 条
[1]   AI Ethics in Predictive Policing From Models of Threat to an Ethics of Care [J].
Asaro, Peter M. .
IEEE TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIETY MAGAZINE, 2019, 38 (02) :40-53
[2]   Motivated to "Roll the Dice" on Trust: The Relationships Between Employees' Daily Motives, Risk Propensity, and Trust [J].
Baer, Michael D. ;
Sessions, Hudson ;
Welsh, David T. ;
Matta, Fadel K. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 107 (09) :1561-1578
[3]  
Barnes M. J., 2011, P HUMAN FACTORS ERGO, V55, P1501, DOI 10.1177/1071181311551312
[4]   SOCIAL CATEGORIZATION AND SIMILARITY IN INTERGROUP BEHAVIOUR [J].
BILLIG, M ;
TAJFEL, H .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1973, 3 (01) :27-52
[5]   How Are We Similar? Group Level Entitativity in Work and Social Groups [J].
Blanchard, Anita L. ;
McBride, Andrew G. ;
Ernst, Brittany A. .
SMALL GROUP RESEARCH, 2023, 54 (03) :369-395
[6]  
Brass D.J., 2012, The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Psychology, V1, P667, DOI DOI 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199928309.013.0021
[7]  
Brewer M.B., 2008, MODERN PIONEERS PSYC, P215, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203889695
[8]  
Brill J. Christopher, 2018, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, V62, P455, DOI 10.1177/1541931218621104
[9]   The (mostly) robust influence of initial trustworthiness beliefs on subsequent behaviors and perceptions [J].
Campagna, Rachel L. ;
Mislin, Alexandra A. ;
Dirks, Kurt T. ;
Elfenbein, Hillary Anger .
HUMAN RELATIONS, 2022, 75 (07) :1383-1411
[10]   Implications of Observability for the Theory and Measurement of Emergent Team Phenomena [J].
Carter, Nathan T. ;
Carter, Dorothy R. ;
DeChurch, Leslie A. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2018, 44 (04) :1398-1425