Informed Ignorance as a Form of Epistemic Injustice

被引:4
作者
Cohen, Noa [1 ]
Garasic, Mirko Daniel [2 ]
机构
[1] Zefat Acad Coll, Zefat Ctr Bioeth, IL-1320611 Safed, Israel
[2] Roma Tre Univ, Dept Educ Sci, I-00185 Rome, Italy
关键词
epistemic distrust; ignorance; information; knowledge; social media; DECISION-MAKING; INFORMATION; MISINFORMATION; LITERACY; CAPACITY; HEALTH;
D O I
10.3390/philosophies9030059
中图分类号
N09 [自然科学史]; B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ; 010108 ; 060207 ; 060305 ; 0712 ;
摘要
Ignorance, or the lack of knowledge, appears to be steadily spreading, despite the increasing availability of information. The notion of informed ignorance herein proposed to describe the widespread position of being exposed to an abundance of information yet lacking relevant knowledge, which is tied to the exponential growth in misinformation driven by technological developments and social media. Linked to many of societies' most looming catastrophes, from political polarization to the climate crisis, practices related to knowledge and information are deemed some of the most imminent and daunting modern threats, evidenced by the latest report of the World Economic Forum, which has named misinformation the most severe short-term global risk. This paper's epistemic perspective links the properties of today's information culture and the ways in which it interacts with individual capacities and limitations in current technological and socio-political contexts. Such a position is analyzed through the lens of epistemic principles as a contemporary epistemic phenotype that emerges from an environment of ill-adapted and excessive information inputs and leads to a distinctive type of social injustice that is primarily epistemic in nature. While equity and accessibility are widely discussed as important contributing factors to epistemic discrepancies, other overlooked but fundamental issues underlying epistemic injustices are considered, such as information manipulation, cognitive limitations, and epistemic degradation. To effectively face this elusive threat, we propose an inclusive viewpoint that harnesses knowledge from cognitive science, science and technology studies, and social epistemology to inform a unifying theory of its main impacts and driving forces. By adjusting a modern epistemic framework to the described phenomena, we intend to contextually outline its trajectory and possible means of containment based on a shared responsibility to maintain ethical epistemic standards. In a time of international unrest and mounting civil acts of violence, it is pertinent to emphasize the ethical principles of knowledge systems and authorities and suggest policy adaptations to maintain a social contract based on the shared values of truth and freedom.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 68 条
  • [1] Non-invasive brain stimulation and neuroenhancement
    Antal, Andrea
    Luber, Bruce
    Brem, Anna-Katharine
    Bikson, Marom
    Brunoni, Andre R.
    Kadosh, Roi Cohen
    Dubljevic, Veljko
    Fecteau, Shirley
    Ferreri, Florinda
    Floeel, Agnes
    Hallett, Mark
    Hamilton, Roy H.
    Herrmann, Christoph S.
    Lavidor, Michal
    Loo, Collen
    Lustenberger, Caroline
    Machado, Sergio
    Miniussi, Carlo
    Moliadze, Vera
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    Rossi, Simone
    Rossini, Paolo M.
    Santarnecchi, Emiliano
    Seeck, Margitta
    Thut, Gregor
    Turi, Zsolt
    Ugawa, Yoshikazu
    Venkatasubramanian, Ganesan
    Wenderoth, Nicole
    Wexler, Anna
    Ziemann, Ulf
    Paulus, Walter
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY PRACTICE, 2022, 7 : 146 - 165
  • [2] Barstow C, 2018, AM FAM PHYSICIAN, V98, P40
  • [3] A Modern History of Informed Consent and the Role of Key Information
    Bazzano, Lydia A.
    Durant, Jaquail
    Brantley, Paula Rhode
    [J]. OCHSNER JOURNAL, 2021, 21 (01) : 81 - 85
  • [4] Epistemic injustice in academic global health
    Bhakuni, Himani
    Abimbola, Seye
    [J]. LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH, 2021, 9 (10): : E1465 - E1470
  • [5] Influence through ignorance
    Brocas, Isabelle
    Carrillo, Juan D.
    [J]. RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2007, 38 (04) : 931 - 947
  • [6] Epistemic injustice in healthcare: a philosophial analysis
    Carel, Havi
    Kidd, Ian James
    [J]. MEDICINE HEALTH CARE AND PHILOSOPHY, 2014, 17 (04) : 529 - 540
  • [7] Chatterjee Anjan, 2013, Handb Clin Neurol, V118, P323, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-444-53501-6.00027-5
  • [8] Cohen Noa, 2023, AJOB Neurosci, V14, P421, DOI 10.1080/21507740.2023.2257182
  • [9] D'Ancona M., 2017, POSTTRUTH NEW WAR TR
  • [10] Davidson D., 1986, TRUTH INTERPRETATION, P307