Predicting emergent animal biodiversity patterns across multiple scales

被引:1
作者
Johnston, Alice S. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cranfield Univ, Ctr Environm & Agr Informat, Cranfield, Bedfords, England
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
communities; ecological modelling; ecosystems; individuals; mechanisms; populations; processes; scale; space; time; FOOD-WEB; BIOTIC INTERACTIONS; MODELS; ADAPTATION; ECOLOGY; CLIMATE; CONSTRAINTS; COMPLEXITY; FRAMEWORK; ABUNDANCE;
D O I
10.1111/gcb.17397
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Restoring biodiversity-based resilience and ecosystem multi-functionality needs to be informed by more accurate predictions of animal biodiversity responses to environmental change. Ecological models make a substantial contribution to this understanding, especially when they encode the biological mechanisms and processes that give rise to emergent patterns (population, community, ecosystem properties and dynamics). Here, a distinction between 'mechanistic' and 'process-based' ecological models is established to review existing approaches. Mechanistic and process-based ecological models have made key advances to understanding the structure, function and dynamics of animal biodiversity, but are typically designed to account for specific levels of biological organisation and spatiotemporal scales. Cross-scale ecological models, which predict emergent co-occurring biodiversity patterns at interacting scales of space, time and biological organisation, is a critical next step in predictive ecology. A way forward is to first capitalise on existing models to systematically evaluate the ability of scale-explicit mechanisms and processes to predict emergent patterns at alternative scales. Such model intercomparisons will reveal mechanism to process transitions across fine to broad scales, overcome approach-specific barriers to model realism or tractability and identify gaps which necessitate the development of new fundamental principles. Key challenges surrounding model complexity and uncertainty would need to be addressed, and while opportunities from big data can streamline the integration of multiple scale-explicit biodiversity patterns, ambitious cross-scale field studies are also needed. Crucially, overcoming cross-scale ecological modelling challenges would unite disparate fields of ecology with the common goal of improving the evidence-base to safeguard biodiversity and ecosystems under novel environmental change. Tackling the ongoing planetary crisis requires environmental solutions that restore biodiversity and ecosystems. The real-world implementation of such solutions would ideally be evidence-based, allowing decision makers to evaluate their ecological consequences before implementation. Mechanistic and process-based ecological models enable predictions of emergent biodiversity responses to novel environments, but current approaches are designed for specific scales. Cross-scale ecological models, that predict emergent co-occurring biodiversity patterns at interacting scales, are a critical next step. A way forward is to capitalise on existing scale-specific models to reveal mechanism to process transitions across scales, uniting disparate fields of ecology in the future.image
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Detecting patterns of vertebrate biodiversity across the multidimensional urban landscape
    Alberti, Marina
    Wang, Tianzhe
    ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2022, 25 (04) : 1027 - 1045
  • [22] Trophic Patterns of Freshwater Fish across the Balkan Biodiversity Hotspot
    Vagenas, Georgios
    Oikonomou, Anthi
    Karachle, Paraskevi K.
    Petriki, Olga
    Stoumboudi, Maria Th
    WATER, 2022, 14 (07)
  • [23] A national approach for mapping and quantifying habitat-based biodiversity metrics across multiple spatial scales
    Boykin, Kenneth G.
    Kepner, William G.
    Bradford, David F.
    Guy, Rachel K.
    Kopp, Darin A.
    Leimer, Allison K.
    Samson, Elizabeth A.
    East, N. Forrest
    Neale, Anne C.
    Gergely, Kevin J.
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2013, 33 : 139 - 147
  • [24] Predicting across scales: Theory development and testing
    Turner, Monica G.
    Dale, Virginia H.
    Gardner, Robert H.
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 1989, 3 (3-4) : 245 - 252
  • [25] Resource quantity and quality differentially control stream invertebrate biodiversity across spatial scales
    Tumolo, Benjamin B.
    Collins, Sarah M.
    Guan, Yawen
    Krist, Amy C.
    ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2023, 26 (12) : 2077 - 2086
  • [26] Regional ecological forecasting across scales: A manifesto for a biodiversity hotspot
    Slingsby, Jasper A.
    Wilson, Adam M.
    Maitner, Brian
    Moncrieff, Glenn R.
    METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2023, 14 (03): : 757 - 770
  • [27] Selection for Gaia across Multiple Scales
    Lenton, Timothy M.
    Daines, Stuart J.
    Dyke, James G.
    Nicholson, Arwen E.
    Wilkinson, David M.
    Williams, Hywel T. P.
    TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2018, 33 (08) : 633 - 645
  • [28] Atmospheric nitrogen deposition is related to plant biodiversity loss at multiple spatial scales
    van der Plas, Fons
    Hautier, Yann
    Ceulemans, Tobias
    Alard, Didier
    Bobbink, Roland
    Diekmann, Martin
    Dise, Nancy B.
    Dorland, Edu
    Dupre, Cecilia
    Gowing, David
    Stevens, Carly
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2024, 30 (08)
  • [29] Enhancing multiple scales of seafloor biodiversity with mussel restoration
    Sea, Mallory A.
    Hillman, Jenny R.
    Thrush, Simon F.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [30] Species turnover drives β-diversity patterns across multiple spatial and temporal scales in Great Lake Coastal Wetland Communities
    Langer, Thomas A.
    Murry, Brent A.
    Pangle, Kevin L.
    Uzarski, Donald G.
    HYDROBIOLOGIA, 2016, 777 (01) : 55 - 66