Neural network approach to portfolio optimization with leverage constraints: a case study on high inflation investment

被引:1
作者
Ni, Chendi [1 ,2 ]
Li, Yuying [1 ]
Forsyth, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L3G1, Canada
[2] Flap Technol, 307 38th St,Floor 16,PMB 468, New York, NY 10018 USA
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Cumulative tracking difference; Leveraged portfolio; Benchmark outperformance; Asset allocation; Machine learning; G11; G22; 91G; OPTIMAL ASSET ALLOCATION; JUMP-DIFFUSION; SELECTION; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; STRATEGIES; DECISIONS; TRACKING; MODELS; MARKET;
D O I
10.1080/14697688.2024.2357733
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Motivated by the current global high inflation scenario, we aim to discover a dynamic multi-period allocation strategy to optimally outperform a passive benchmark while adhering to a bounded leverage limit. We formulate an optimal control problem to outperform a benchmark portfolio throughout the investment horizon. To obtain strategies under the bounded leverage constraint among other realistic constraints, we propose a novel leverage-feasible neural network (LFNN) to represent the control, which converts the original constrained optimization problem into an unconstrained optimization problem that is computationally feasible with gradient descent, without dynamic programming. We establish mathematically that the LFNN approximation can yield a solution that is arbitrarily close to the solution of the original optimal control problem with bounded leverage. We further validate the performance of the LFNN empirically by deriving a closed-form solution under jump-diffusion asset price models and show that a shallow LFNN model achieves comparable results on synthetic data. In the case study, we apply the LFNN approach to a four-asset investment scenario with bootstrap-resampled asset returns from the filtered high inflation regimes. The LFNN strategy is shown to consistently outperform the passive benchmark strategy by about 200 bps (median annualized return), with a greater than 90% probability of outperforming the benchmark at the end of the investment horizon.
引用
收藏
页码:753 / 777
页数:25
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]  
Al-Aradi A., 2018, Applied Mathematical Finance, V25, P268, DOI DOI 10.1080/1350486X.2018.1507751
[2]   Extensions of the deep Galerkin method [J].
Al-Aradi, Ali ;
Correia, Adolfo ;
Jardim, Gabriel ;
Naiff, Danilo de Freitas ;
Saporito, Yuri .
APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTATION, 2022, 430
[3]   Benchmark-based evaluation of portfolio performance: a characterization [J].
Alekseev, Aleksandr G. ;
Sokolov, Mikhail V. .
ANNALS OF FINANCE, 2016, 12 (3-4) :409-440
[4]   Investment timing and trading strategies in the sale and purchase market for ships [J].
Alizadeh, Amir H. ;
Nomikos, Nikos K. .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2007, 41 (01) :126-143
[5]   Stocks for the long run? Evidence from a broad sample of developed markets [J].
Anarkulova, Aizhan ;
Cederburg, Scott ;
O'Doherty, Michael S. .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 143 (01) :409-433
[6]   Portfolio Choice with Illiquid Assets [J].
Ang, Andrew ;
Papanikolaou, Dimitris ;
Westerfield, Mark M. .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2014, 60 (11) :2737-2761
[7]  
Ba J, 2014, ACS SYM SER
[8]  
Ball L., 2022, Understanding us inflation during the covid era
[9]   Risk management with benchmarking [J].
Basak, S ;
Shapiro, A ;
Teplá, L .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2006, 52 (04) :542-557
[10]  
Black F., 1993, FINANC ANAL J, V49, P36, DOI [10.2469/faj.v49.n5.36, DOI 10.2469/FAJ.V49.N5.36]