The Transmission of Cumulative Cultural Knowledge - Towards a Social Epistemology of Non-Testimonial Cultural Learning

被引:0
作者
Mueller, Basil [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Inst Philosophy, Langgassstr 49a, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Transmission of knowledge; cumulative culture; social learning; testimony; HUMAN COOPERATION; EVOLUTION;
D O I
10.1080/02691728.2024.2356588
中图分类号
N09 [自然科学史]; B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ; 010108 ; 060207 ; 060305 ; 0712 ;
摘要
Cumulative cultural knowledge (CCK), the knowledge we acquire via social learning and has been refined by previous generations, is of central importance to our species' flourishing. Considering its importance, we should expect that our best epistemological theories can account for how this happens. Perhaps surprisingly, CCK and how we acquire it via cultural learning has only received little attention from social epistemologists. Here, I focus on how we should epistemically evaluate how agents acquire CCK. After sampling some reasons why extant theories cannot account for CCK, I suggest that things aren't as bleak as they might look. I explain how agents deserve epistemic credit for how CCK is transmitted in cultural learning by promoting a central need of their social group: the efficient and safe transmission of CCK. A good initial fit exists between this observation and Greco's knowledge-economy framework. Ultimately, however, Greco's account doesn't straightforwardly account for CCK because of its strict focus on testimony. I point out two issues in the framework due to this focus. The resulting view advocates giving epistemic credit to agents when they act to promote their communities' epistemic needs in the right way and highlights the various ways in which agents come to do this.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] Clarifying Misconceptions of the Zone of Latent Solutions Hypothesis: A Response to Haidle and Schlaudt Miriam Noel Haidle and Oliver Schlaudt: Where Does Cumulative Culture Begin? A Plea for a Sociologically Informed Perspective (Biological Theory 15: 161-174, 2020)
    Bandini, Elisa
    Reeves, Jonathan Scott
    Snyder, William Daniel
    Tennie, Claudio
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL THEORY, 2021, 16 (02) : 76 - 82
  • [2] Access denied: epistemic obstruction and the distribution of knowledge
    Battaly, Heather
    [J]. SYNTHESE, 2022, 201 (01)
  • [3] Epistemic blame
    Boult, Cameron
    [J]. PHILOSOPHY COMPASS, 2021, 16 (08)
  • [4] A taxonomy of types of epistemic dependence: introduction to the Synthese special issue on epistemic dependence
    Broncano-Berrocal, Fernando
    Vega-Encabo, Jesus
    [J]. SYNTHESE, 2020, 197 (07) : 2745 - 2763
  • [5] de Regt H. W., 2017, UNDERSTANDING SCI UN, DOI [DOI 10.1093/OSO/9780190652913.001.0001, 10.1093/oso/9780190652913.001.0001]
  • [6] Human cumulative culture: a comparative perspective
    Dean, Lewis G.
    Vale, Gill L.
    Laland, Kevin N.
    Flynn, Emma
    Kendal, Rachel L.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 2014, 89 (02) : 284 - 301
  • [7] Conceptualizing Epistemic Oppression
    Dotson, Kristie
    [J]. SOCIAL EPISTEMOLOGY, 2014, 28 (02) : 115 - 138
  • [8] Elgin Catherine., 1999, Considered Judgment
  • [9] Strong reciprocity, human cooperation, and the enforcement of social norms
    Fehr, E
    Fischbacher, U
    Gächter, S
    [J]. HUMAN NATURE-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY BIOSOCIAL PERSPECTIVE, 2002, 13 (01): : 1 - 25
  • [10] THE DIVISION OF EPISTEMIC LABOR
    Goldberg, Sandy
    [J]. EPISTEME-A JOURNAL OF INDIVIDUAL AND SOCIAL EPISTEMOLOGY, 2011, 8 (01): : 112 - 125