Cost-effectiveness of Genetic Testing of Endocrine Tumor Patients Using a Comprehensive Hereditary Cancer Gene Panel

被引:2
作者
Patocs, Attila [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,7 ]
Nagy, Petra [3 ,4 ]
Papp, Janos [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Bozsik, Aniko [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Antal, Balint [5 ]
Grolmusz, Vince Kornel [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Pocza, Timea [3 ,4 ]
Butz, Henriett [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Hungarian Res Network, HUN REN Hereditary Tumors Res Grp, H-1089 Budapest, Hungary
[2] Semmelweis Univ, Dept Lab Med, H-1089 Budapest, Hungary
[3] Natl Inst Oncol, Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Mol Genet, H-1122 Budapest, Hungary
[4] Natl Inst Oncol, Comprehens Canc Ctr, Natl Tumor Biol Lab, H-1122 Budapest, Hungary
[5] Semmelweis Univ, Natl Acad Scientist Educ, H-1085 Budapest, Hungary
[6] Natl Inst Oncol, Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Oncol Biobank, H-1122 Budapest, Hungary
[7] Natl Inst Oncol, Comprehens Canc Ctr, 7-9 Rath Gyorgy Str, H-1122 Budapest, Hungary
关键词
multigene panel; NGS; hereditary endocrine tumor; germline; diagnostic; genetic testing; GUIDELINES; ASSOCIATION; STANDARDS;
D O I
10.1210/clinem/dgae300
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Heterogenous clinical manifestations, overlapping phenotypes, and complex genetic backgrounds are common in patients with endocrine tumors. There are no comprehensive recommendations for genetic testing and counseling of these patients compared to other hereditary cancer syndromes. The application of multigene panel testing is common in clinical genetic laboratories, but their performance for patients with endocrine tumors has not been assessed.Methods As a national reference center, we prospectively tested the diagnostic utility and cost-efficiency of a multigene panel covering 113 genes representing genetic susceptibility for solid tumors; 1279 patients (including 96 cases with endocrine tumors) were evaluated between October 2021 and December 2022 who were suspected to have hereditary tumor syndromes.Results The analytical performance of the hereditary cancer panel was suitable for diagnostic testing. Clinical diagnosis was confirmed in 24% (23/96); incidental findings in genes not associated with the patient's phenotype were identified in 5% (5/96). A further 7% of pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants were detected in genes with potential genetic susceptibility roles but currently no clear clinical consequence. Cost-benefit analysis showed that the application of a more comprehensive gene panel in a diagnostic laboratory yielded a shorter turnaround time and provided additional genetic results with the same cost and workload.Discussion Using comprehensive multigene panel results in faster turnaround time and cost-efficiently identifies genetic alterations in hereditary endocrine tumor syndromes. Incidentally identified variants in patients with poor prognoses may serve as a potential therapeutic target in tumors where therapeutic possibilities are limited.
引用
收藏
页码:3220 / 3233
页数:14
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] GENETIC TESTING ACMG guides on the interpretation of sequence variants
    Bahcall, Orli G.
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2015, 16 (05) : 257 - 257
  • [2] Challenges and opportunities in genetic counseling for hereditary endocrine neoplasia syndromes
    Brock, Pamela
    Geurts, Jennifer L.
    Van Galen, Paulien
    Blouch, Erica
    Welch, James
    Kunz, Amy
    Desrosiers, Lauren
    Gauerke, Jennifer
    Hyde, Samuel
    [J]. ENDOCRINE-RELATED CANCER, 2020, 27 (08) : T65 - T75
  • [3] Molecular genetic testing strategies used in diagnostic flow for hereditary endocrine tumour syndromes
    Butz, Henriett
    Blair, Jo
    Patocs, Attila
    [J]. ENDOCRINE, 2021, 71 (03) : 641 - 652
  • [4] Molecular genetic diagnostics of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism: from panel design towards result interpretation in clinical practice
    Butz, Henriett
    Nyiro, Gabor
    Kurucz, Petra Anna
    Liko, Istvan
    Patocs, Attila
    [J]. HUMAN GENETICS, 2021, 140 (01) : 113 - 134
  • [5] Differences in Cancer Phenotypes Among Frequent CHEK2 Variants and Implications for Clinical Care-Checking CHEK2
    Bychkovsky, Brittany L.
    Agaoglu, Nihat B.
    Horton, Carolyn
    Zhou, Jing
    Yussuf, Amal
    Hemyari, Parichehr
    Richardson, Marcy E.
    Young, Colin
    LaDuca, Holly
    McGuinness, Deborah L.
    Scheib, Rochelle
    Garber, Judy E.
    Rana, Huma Q.
    [J]. JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2022, 8 (11) : 1598 - 1606
  • [6] Hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell carcinoma: a case series and literature review
    Chayed, Zahraa
    Kristensen, Lone Kroldrup
    Ousager, Lilian Bomme
    Ronlund, Karina
    Bygum, Anette
    [J]. ORPHANET JOURNAL OF RARE DISEASES, 2021, 16 (01)
  • [7] Molecular genetic testing in the management of pituitary disease
    Coopmans, Eva C.
    Korbonits, Marta
    [J]. CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2022, 97 (04) : 424 - 435
  • [8] Recommendations for reporting results of diagnostic genomic testing
    Deans, Zandra C.
    Ahn, Joo Wook
    Carreira, Isabel M.
    Dequeker, Elisabeth
    Henderson, Mick
    Lovrecic, Luca
    Ounap, Katrin
    Tabiner, Melody
    Treacy, Rebecca
    van Asperen, Christi J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2022, 30 (09) : 1011 - 1016
  • [9] Association of adrenocortical carcinoma with familial cancer susceptibility syndromes
    Else, Tobias
    [J]. MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2012, 351 (01) : 66 - 70
  • [10] Beyond Li Fraumeni Syndrome: Clinical Characteristics of Families With p53 Germline Mutations
    Gonzalez, Kelly D.
    Noltner, Katie A.
    Buzin, Carolyn H.
    Gu, Dongqing
    Wen-Fong, Cindy Y.
    Nguyen, Vu Q.
    Han, Jennifer H.
    Lowstuter, Katrina
    Longmate, Jeffrey
    Sommer, Steve S.
    Weitzel, Jeffrey N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (08) : 1250 - 1256