Efficacy and safety of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in ovarian cancer: a systematic review of current evidence

被引:4
作者
Pavone, Matteo [1 ,2 ]
Jochum, Floriane [3 ]
Lecointre, Lise [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Bizzarri, Nicolo [2 ]
Taliento, Cristina [5 ,6 ]
Restaino, Stefano [7 ]
Vizzielli, Giuseppe [7 ,8 ]
Fagotti, Anna [2 ]
Scambia, Giovanni [2 ]
Querleu, Denis [1 ,2 ]
Akladios, Cherif [3 ]
机构
[1] IHU Strasbourg, Inst Image Guided Surg, 1 Pl Hop, F-67091 Strasbourg, France
[2] Fdn Policlin Univ A Gemelli, Dipartimento Sci Salute Donna & Bambino & Sanita P, UOC Ginecol Oncol, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Hosp Strasbourg, Dept Gynecol Surg, Strasbourg, France
[4] Univ Strasbourg, UMR 7357, Lab Sci Ingenieur Informat & Imagerie, ICube, F-67000 Strasbourg, France
[5] Univ Hosp Ferrara, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Ferrara, Italy
[6] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[7] Azienda Sanit Univ Friuli Cent, Santa Maria Della Misericordia Univ Hosp, Clin Obstet & Gynecol, Udine, Italy
[8] Univ Udine, Dept Med, Udine, Italy
关键词
Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy; PIPAC; Ovarian cancer; Peritoneal carcinomatosis; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PERITONEAL METASTASIS; NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; THERAPY; MANAGEMENT; SURVIVAL; DOXORUBICIN; SURGERY; TRIALS; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1007/s00404-024-07586-z
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background PIPAC is a recent approach for intraperitoneal chemotherapy with promising results for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. A systematic review was conducted to assess current evidence on the efficacy and outcomes of PIPAC in patients affected by ovarian cancer.Methods The study adhered to the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Google Scholar and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched up to December 2023. Studies reporting data on patients with OC treated with PIPAC were included in the qualitative analysis.Results Twenty-one studies and six clinical trials with 932 patients who underwent PIPAC treatment were identified. The reported first access failure was 4.9%. 89.8% of patients underwent one, 60.7% two and 40% received three or more PIPAC cycles. Pathological tumour response was objectivated in 13 studies. Intra-operative complications were reported in 11% of women and post-operative events in 11.5% with a 0.82% of procedure-related mortality. Quality of life scores have been consistently stable or improved during the treatment time. The percentage of OC patients who became amenable for cytoreductive surgery due to the good response after PIPAC treatment for palliative purposes is reported to be 2.3%.Conclusion The results showed that PIPAC is safe and effective for palliative purposes, with a good pathological tumour response and quality of life. Future prospective studies would be needed to explore the role of this treatment in different stages of the disease, investigating a paradigm shift towards the use of PIPAC with curative intent for women who are not eligible for primary cytoreductive surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:1845 / 1856
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Oncological Outcomes After Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) in the Treatment of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis [J].
Tidadini, Fatah ;
Abba, Julio ;
Quesada, Jean-Louis ;
Trilling, Bertrand ;
Bonne, Aline ;
Foote, Alison ;
Faucheron, Jean-Luc ;
Arvieux, Catherine .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL CANCER, 2023, 54 (02) :632-641
[42]   Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) as a neoadjuvant therapy before cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy [J].
Girshally, Ramy ;
Demtroeder, Cedric ;
Albayrak, Nurettin ;
Zieren, Juergen ;
Tempfer, Clemens ;
Reymond, Marc A. .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 14
[43]   Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) with Low-Dose Cisplatin and Doxorubicin in Gastric Peritoneal Metastasis [J].
Nadiradze, Giorgi ;
Giger-Pabst, Urs ;
Zieren, Juergen ;
Strumberg, Dirk ;
Solass, Wiebke ;
Reymond, Marc-Andre .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2016, 20 (02) :367-373
[44]   First Indian Study on Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) Procedure for Advanced Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Secondary to Epithelial Ovarian Cancer [J].
Somashekhar S.P. ;
Rajagopal A.K. ;
Zaveri S.S. ;
Chandrashekhar R.K. ;
Rauthan A. ;
Rakshit S.H. .
Indian Journal of Gynecologic Oncology, 2018, 16 (2)
[45]   Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy, reasons for interrupting treatment: a systematic review of the literature [J].
Ezanno, Anne-Cecile ;
Malgras, Brice ;
Pocard, Marc .
PLEURA AND PERITONEUM, 2023, 8 (02) :45-53
[46]   Establishment of a rat ovarian peritoneal metastasis model to study pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) [J].
Leen Van de Sande ;
Wouter Willaert ;
Sarah Cosyns ;
Kaat De Clercq ;
Molood Shariati ;
Katrien Remaut ;
Wim Ceelen .
BMC Cancer, 19
[47]   Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in association with systemic chemotherapy and bevacizumab, evaluation of safety and feasibility. A single center comparative study [J].
Siebert, Matthieu ;
Alyami, Mohammad ;
Mercier, Frederic ;
Gallice, Colin ;
Villeneuve, Laurent ;
Laplace, Nathalie ;
Passot, Guillaume ;
Bakrin, Naoual ;
Glehen, Olivier ;
Kepenekian, Vahan .
EJSO, 2021, 47 (01) :139-142
[48]   Radiologist Checklist for Selecting Patients to Undergo PIPAC (Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy) [J].
Rodolfino, Elena ;
Di Marco, Margo' ;
Ilot, Alessia ;
Iezzi, Roberto ;
Gui, Benedetta ;
Avesani, Giacomo ;
Panico, Camilla ;
Strippoli, Antonia ;
Di Giorgio, Andrea ;
Pacelli, Fabio ;
Manfredi, Riccardo .
LIFE-BASEL, 2021, 11 (09)
[49]   Comparison between microcatheter and nebulizer for generating Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) [J].
Laura Toussaint ;
Yaroslav Sautkin ;
Barbara Illing ;
Frank-Jürgen Weinreich ;
Giorgi Nadiradze ;
Alfred Königsrainer ;
Dörte Wichmann .
Surgical Endoscopy, 2021, 35 :1636-1643
[50]   Initial experience of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in a French hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) expert center [J].
C. Ceribelli ;
T. Debs ;
A. Chevallier ;
M. A. Piche ;
J. M. Bereder .
Surgical Endoscopy, 2020, 34 :2803-2806