Mapping the Memory Structure of High-Knowledge Students: A Longitudinal Semantic Network Analysis

被引:1
作者
Luchini, Simone A. [1 ]
Wang, Shuyao [1 ,2 ]
Kenett, Yoed N. [3 ]
Beaty, Roger E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Psychol, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Drexel Univ, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Fac Data & Decis Sci, IL-320003 Haifa, Israel
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
cognitive network science; educational assessment; expertise; knowledge; semantic memory; undergraduate education; CONCEPT MAPS; INTELLIGENCE; REPRESENTATION; BOOTSTRAP; MODEL;
D O I
10.3390/jintelligence12060056
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Standard learning assessments like multiple-choice questions measure what students know but not how their knowledge is organized. Recent advances in cognitive network science provide quantitative tools for modeling the structure of semantic memory, revealing key learning mechanisms. In two studies, we examined the semantic memory networks of undergraduate students enrolled in an introductory psychology course. In Study 1, we administered a cumulative multiple-choice test of psychology knowledge, the Intro Psych Test, at the end of the course. To estimate semantic memory networks, we administered two verbal fluency tasks: domain-specific fluency (naming psychology concepts) and domain-general fluency (naming animals). Based on their performance on the Intro Psych Test, we categorized students into a high-knowledge or low-knowledge group, and compared their semantic memory networks. Study 1 (N = 213) found that the high-knowledge group had semantic memory networks that were more clustered, with shorter distances between concepts-across both the domain-specific (psychology) and domain-general (animal) categories-compared to the low-knowledge group. In Study 2 (N = 145), we replicated and extended these findings in a longitudinal study, collecting data near the start and end of the semester. In addition to replicating Study 1, we found the semantic memory networks of high-knowledge students became more interconnected over time, across both domain-general and domain-specific categories. These findings suggest that successful learners show a distinct semantic memory organization-characterized by high connectivity and short path distances between concepts-highlighting the utility of cognitive network science for studying variation in student learning.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 69 条
  • [11] Networks in Learning Analytics: Where Theory, Methodology, and Practice Intersect
    Chen, Bodong
    Poquet, Oleksandra
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LEARNING ANALYTICS, 2022, 9 (01): : 1 - 12
  • [12] CATEGORIZATION AND REPRESENTATION OF PHYSICS PROBLEMS BY EXPERTS AND NOVICES
    CHI, MTH
    FELTOVICH, PJ
    GLASER, R
    [J]. COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 1981, 5 (02) : 121 - 152
  • [13] Semantic Network Analysis (SemNA): A Tutorial on Preprocessing, Estimating, and Analyzing Semantic Networks
    Christensen, Alexander P.
    Kenett, Yoed N.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2023, 28 (04) : 860 - 879
  • [14] SPREADING ACTIVATION THEORY OF SEMANTIC PROCESSING
    COLLINS, AM
    LOFTUS, EF
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1975, 82 (06) : 407 - 428
  • [15] Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user's guide
    Conway, ARA
    Kane, MJ
    Bunting, MF
    Hambrick, DZ
    Wilhelm, O
    Engle, RW
    [J]. PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2005, 12 (05) : 769 - 786
  • [16] Age Differences in Semantic Network Structure: Acquiring Knowledge Shapes Semantic Memory
    Cosgrove, Abigail L. L.
    Beaty, Roger E. E.
    Diaz, Michele T. T.
    Kenett, Yoed N. N.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 2023, 38 (02) : 87 - 102
  • [17] Intelligence and educational achievement
    Deary, Ian J.
    Strand, Steve
    Smith, Pauline
    Fernandes, Cres
    [J]. INTELLIGENCE, 2007, 35 (01) : 13 - 21
  • [18] Education shapes the structure of semantic memory and impacts creative thinking
    Denervaud, Solange
    Christensen, Alexander P.
    Kenett, Yoed. N.
    Beaty, Roger E.
    [J]. NPJ SCIENCE OF LEARNING, 2021, 6 (01)
  • [19] What changes in conceptual change?
    diSessa, AA
    Sherin, BL
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 1998, 20 (10) : 1155 - 1191
  • [20] 1977 RIETZ LECTURE - BOOTSTRAP METHODS - ANOTHER LOOK AT THE JACKKNIFE
    EFRON, B
    [J]. ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 1979, 7 (01) : 1 - 26