Design, global energy integration, and sustainability analyses of a process coupling renewable energy water electrolysis for hydrogen production with ammonia synthesis

被引:3
作者
Zhou, Huairong [1 ]
Chen, Zhenwei [1 ]
Meng, Wenliang [1 ]
Yang, Siyu [2 ]
机构
[1] Lanzhou Univ Technol, Sch Petrochem Engn, Lanzhou 730050, Gansu, Peoples R China
[2] South China Univ Technol, Sch Chem Engn, Guangzhou 510640, Guangdong, Peoples R China
来源
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING | 2024年 / 12卷 / 03期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Green hydrogen; Green ammonia; Energy integration; Pollution reduction; Sustainability analyses; COMPARATIVE TECHNOECONOMIC ANALYSIS; COKE-OVEN GAS; HEAT INTEGRATION; NATURAL-GAS; CO2; CAPTURE; POWER; COAL; PERFORMANCE; INDUSTRIAL; METHANOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jece.2024.112892
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The conventional ammonia synthesis process typically depends on fossil energy and faces challenges such as low utilization of elements and high CO2 emissions, leading to unsatisfactory economic performance. In order to achieve green synthesis and sustainable development of ammonia, this study constructed a process for renewable energy water electrolysis hydrogen production coupled with ammonia synthesis. The process includes: PEM electrolysis water hydrogen production coupling synthesis ammonia (PEM-GHtA) and SOEC electrolysis water hydrogen production coupling synthesis ammonia (SOEC-GHtA). Compared to traditional ammonia synthesis, the new process eliminates the use of carbon conversion for hydrogen production. Instead, it utilizes green electrolysis to split water into hydrogen and oxygen, leading to enhanced energy efficiency and decreased carbon emissions. By employing modeling, simulation, global energy integration, and conducting technical and economic analysis of the new process, this study elucidates the technical advantages and economic competitiveness of the new process over the traditional ammonia synthesis process. According to the analysis results, the utilization rates of hydrogen element in the PEM-GHtA and SOEC-GHtA processes are 92.64% and 92.59%, and the utilization rate of nitrogen element is 90.56% and 90.50%, respectively, much higher than the traditional ammonia synthesis process. In addition, the SOEC-GHtA demonstrated improved energy efficiency, achieving a range of 72.19-75.08%. The CO2 emissions of the two green ammonia synthesis processes are 0.17-0.81 t CO2/t NH3, much lower than the 1.6-3.6 t CO2/t NH3 of the traditional ammonia synthesis process. Based on the current market price, the production cost of green ammonia is relatively high, which has no economic advantage over the traditional ammonia synthesis process. Considering the future implementation of carbon taxes and the decreasing prices of renewable energy electricity to 0.014 $/kWh, the production costs of PEM-GHtA and SOECGHtA will be reduced to 359.7 $/t NH3 and 343.5 $/t NH3 respectively. In comparison to the traditional process (403.1-514.7 $/t NH3), the new process offers substantial economic benefits and shows promising prospects for further development.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 65 条
[21]   Hydrogen production from renewable and sustainable energy resources: Promising green energy carrier for clean development [J].
Hosseini, Seyed Ehsan ;
Wahid, Mazlan Abdul .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 57 :850-866
[22]   Energy consumption and carbon emissions forecasting for industrial processes: Status, challenges and perspectives [J].
Hu, Yusha ;
Man, Yi .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2023, 182
[23]   Ammonia synthesis from nitrogen and water at intermediate temperatures and elevated pressures by using an electrochemical hydrogen-membrane reactor with supported Ru catalysts and phosphate electrolytes [J].
Imamura, Kanako ;
Kubota, Jun .
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY & FUELS, 2019, 3 (06) :1406-1417
[24]   An Ammonia-Hydrogen Energy Roadmap for Carbon Neutrality: Opportunity and Challenges in China [J].
Jiang, Lilong ;
Fu, Xianzhi .
ENGINEERING, 2021, 7 (12) :1688-1691
[25]   Energy-cost-aware flow shop scheduling considering intermittent renewables, energy storage, and real-time electricity pricing [J].
Khalaf, Alireza Fazli ;
Wang, Yong .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2018, 42 (12) :3928-3942
[26]   Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of renewable gas technologies: A comparative review [J].
Kolb, Sebastian ;
Plankenbuehler, Thomas ;
Hofmann, Katharina ;
Bergerson, Joule ;
Karl, Juergen .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2021, 146
[27]   Hydrogen production by PEM water electrolysis – A review [J].
Shiva Kumar S. ;
Himabindu V. .
Materials Science for Energy Technologies, 2019, 2 (03) :442-454
[28]   Total Site Heat Integration planning and design for industrial, urban and renewable systems [J].
Liew, Peng Yen ;
Theo, Wai Lip ;
Alwi, Sharifah Rafidah Wan ;
Lim, Jeng Shiun ;
Manan, Zainuddin Abdul ;
Klemes, Jiri Jaromir ;
Varbanov, Petar Sabev .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 68 :964-985
[29]   Integrating district cooling systems in Locally Integrated Energy Sectors through Total Site Heat Integration [J].
Liew, Peng Yen ;
Walmsley, Timothy Gordon ;
Alwi, Sharifah Rafidah Wan ;
Manan, Zainuddin Abdul ;
Klemes, Jiri Jaromir ;
Varbanov, Petar Sabev .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 184 :1350-1363
[30]   Towards a sustainable distributed energy system in China: decision-making for strategies and policy implications [J].
Lin, Ruojue ;
Liu, Yue ;
Man, Yi ;
Ren, Jingzheng .
ENERGY SUSTAINABILITY AND SOCIETY, 2019, 9 (01)