Ecosystem engineers shape ecological network structure and stability: A framework and literature review

被引:1
|
作者
Sanders, Dirk [1 ]
Frago, Enric [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Exeter, Coll Life & Environm Sci, Ctr Ecol & Conservat, Penryn, Cornwall, England
[2] CBGP Ctr Biol & Management Populat, CIRAD, Montpellier, France
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
ecological communities; ecosystem functions; habitat modification; physical environment; restoration; species interactions; SPECIES RICHNESS; PLANT; DIVERSITY; BEAVER; BIODIVERSITY; CONSEQUENCES; COMMUNITIES; INVASIONS; CONSERVATION; FACILITATION;
D O I
10.1111/1365-2435.14608
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Ecosystem engineering is a ubiquitous process where species influence the physical environment and thereby structure ecological communities. However, there has been little effort to synthesize or predict how ecosystem engineering may impact the structure and stability of interaction networks. To assess current scientific understanding of ecosystem engineering impacts via habitat forming, habitat modification and bioturbation on interaction networks/food webs, we reviewed the literature covering marine, freshwater and terrestrial food webs, plant-pollinator networks and theory. We provide a conceptual framework and identify three major pathways of engineering impact on networks through changes in resource availability and energy flow, habitat heterogeneity and environmental filtering. These three processes often work in concert and most studies report that engineering increases species richness. This is particularly marked for engineers that increase habitat heterogeneity and thereby the number of available niches. The response of network structure to ecosystem engineering varies, however some patterns emerge from this review. Engineered habitat heterogeneity leads to a higher number of links between species in the networks and increases link density. Connectance can be negatively or positively affected by ecosystem engineer impact, depending on the engineering pathway and the engineer impact of species richness. We discuss how ecosystem engineers can stabilize or destabilize communities through the changes in niche space, diversity, network structure and the dependency on the engineering impact. Theory and empirical evidence need to inform each other to better integrate ecosystem engineering and ecological networks. A mechanistic understanding how ecosystem engineering traits shape interactions networks and their stability will be important to predict species extinctions and can provide crucial information for conservation and ecosystem restoration.Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.image
引用
收藏
页码:1683 / 1696
页数:14
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Integrating ecological engineering and ecological intensification from management practices to ecosystem services into a generic framework: a review
    Rey, Freddy
    Cecillon, Lauric
    Cordonnier, Thomas
    Jaunatre, Renaud
    Loucougaray, Gregory
    AGRONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 35 (04) : 1335 - 1345
  • [2] Protozoa populations are ecosystem engineers that shape prokaryotic community structure and function of the rumen microbial ecosystem
    Solomon, Ronnie
    Wein, Tanita
    Levy, Bar
    Eshed, Shahar
    Dror, Rotem
    Reiss, Veronica
    Zehavi, Tamar
    Furman, Ori
    Mizrahi, Itzhak
    Jami, Elie
    ISME JOURNAL, 2022, 16 (04) : 1187 - 1197
  • [3] Ecosystem services and ecological compensation of world heritage: A literature review
    Fu, Yuanyuan
    Xiong, Kangning
    Zhang, Zhenzhen
    JOURNAL FOR NATURE CONSERVATION, 2021, 60
  • [4] Integrating ecological engineering and ecological intensification from management practices to ecosystem services into a generic framework: a review
    Freddy Rey
    Lauric Cécillon
    Thomas Cordonnier
    Renaud Jaunatre
    Grégory Loucougaray
    Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2015, 35 : 1335 - 1345
  • [5] Spatial Structure of a Potential Ecological Network in Nanping, China, Based on Ecosystem Service Functions
    Xiao, Ling
    Cui, Li
    Jiang, Qun'ou
    Wang, Meilin
    Xu, Lidan
    Yan, Haiming
    LAND, 2020, 9 (10) : 1 - 18
  • [6] Ecosystem Services for Planning: A Generic Recommendation or a Real Framework? Insights from a Literature Review
    Ronchi, Silvia
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (12)
  • [7] The valuation of marine ecosystem goods and services in the Caribbean: A literature review and framework for future valuation efforts
    Schuhmann, Peter W.
    Mahon, Robin
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2015, 11 : 56 - 66
  • [8] Trophic networks: How do theories link ecosystem structure and functioning to stability properties? A review
    Saint-Beat, Blanche
    Baird, Dan
    Asmus, Harald
    Asmus, Ragnhild
    Bacher, Cedric
    Pacella, Stephen R.
    Johnson, Galen A.
    David, Valerie
    Vezina, Alain F.
    Niquil, Nathalie
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2015, 52 : 458 - 471
  • [9] From Green Infrastructure to Blue and Green Infrastructure Network: institutionalization of ecological connectivity at the science-policy interface. A literature review
    Fustec, Klervi
    Levain, Alix
    DEVELOPPEMENT DURABLE & TERRITOIRES, 2023, 14 (02):
  • [10] Generalists are more specialized in low-resource habitats, increasing stability of ecological network structure
    Robinson, Moria L.
    Strauss, Sharon Y.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2020, 117 (04) : 2043 - 2048