Mainstream partisans' affective response to (non) cooperation with populist radical right parties

被引:3
作者
Russo, Luana [1 ]
Brock, Paula Schulze [2 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Polit Dept, Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
Negative affect; populist radical right-wing parties; cordon sanitaire; inter-party cooperation; ANTI-IMMIGRATION PARTIES; SOCIAL IDENTITY; ELECTORAL SUCCESS; POLARIZATION; PERCEPTIONS; EXCLUSION; SUPPORT; CHOICE; IDENTIFICATION; DIMENSIONS;
D O I
10.1080/01402382.2024.2336436
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
What is the role of elite-level inter-party strategies in promoting or reducing negative affective evaluations of citizens? This article explores this puzzle by focusing on the decision of mainstream parties to exclude or cooperate with populist radical right-wing parties (PRRPs) in Western European countries. The analysis is based on CSES cross-national data and the LISS Dutch panel data merged with the record on whether PRRPs are subject to a cordon sanitaire or (in)formally cooperate with mainstream parties in a government coalition. The findings suggest that political exclusion fuels loathing for PRRPs among mainstream party supporters, while cooperation reduces dislike of PRRPs both among supporters of PRRP coalition partners and left-wing voters. Distinguishing between informal and formal coalitions, the cross-national data shows that only formal cooperation has a significant effect. However, the longitudinal Dutch data shows a temporary decrease of dislike also during informal cooperation.
引用
收藏
页码:1389 / 1427
页数:39
相关论文
共 114 条
[1]   The Company You Keep: How Voters Infer Party Positions on European Integration from Governing Coalition Arrangements [J].
Adams, James ;
Ezrow, Lawrence ;
Wlezien, Christopher .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2016, 60 (04) :811-823
[2]   Pariahs or Partners? Inclusion and Exclusion of Radical Right Parties and the Effects on Their Policy Positions [J].
Akkerman, Tjitske ;
Rooduijn, Matthijs .
POLITICAL STUDIES, 2015, 63 (05) :1140-1157
[3]   Reacting to the radical right - Lessons from Germany and Austria [J].
Art, David .
PARTY POLITICS, 2007, 13 (03) :331-349
[4]   If You Can't Beat Them, Join Them? Explaining Social Democratic Responses to the Challenge from the Populist Radical Right in Western Europe [J].
Bale, Tim ;
Green-Pedersen, Christoffer ;
Krouwel, Andre ;
Luther, Kurt Richard ;
Sitter, Nick .
POLITICAL STUDIES, 2010, 58 (03) :410-426
[5]   Elite polarization, party extremity, and affective polarization [J].
Banda, Kevin K. ;
Cluverius, John .
ELECTORAL STUDIES, 2018, 56 :90-101
[6]   Negative and Positive Partisanship in the 2016 US Presidential Elections [J].
Bankert, Alexa .
POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, 2021, 43 (04) :1467-1485
[7]   Party Competition and Cooperation Shape Affective Polarization: Evidence from Natural and Survey Experiments in Israel [J].
Bassan-Nygate, Lotem ;
Weiss, Chagai M. .
COMPARATIVE POLITICAL STUDIES, 2022, 55 (02) :287-318
[8]   The Better Angels of Our Nature: How the Antiprejudice Norm Affects Policy and Party Preferences in Great Britain and Germany [J].
Blinder, Scott ;
Ford, Robert ;
Ivarsflaten, Elisabeth .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2013, 57 (04) :841-857
[9]  
Bowler S., 2018, The Oxford Handbook of Public Choice, V1, P381
[10]   The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love or outgroup hate? [J].
Brewer, MB .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 1999, 55 (03) :429-444