Centrifuge model tests on performance of MSE walls with different facing types

被引:1
作者
Li, Ting [1 ]
Zhong, Yi [2 ]
Xu, Peng [3 ]
Yang, Guangqing [2 ]
Jiang, Guanlu [4 ]
机构
[1] Shijiazhuang Tiedao Univ, Key Lab Rd & Railway Engn Safety Control, Minist Educ, Shijiazhuang 050043, Peoples R China
[2] Shijiazhuang Tiedao Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Shijiazhuang 050043, Peoples R China
[3] Shijiazhuang Tiedao Univ, State Key Lab Mech Behav & Syst Safety Traff Engn, Shijiazhuang 050043, Peoples R China
[4] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Chengdu 610031, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Geosynthetics; MSE walls; Centrifuge model test; Full -height facing panel; Modular block facing; REINFORCED SOIL WALLS; TOE RESISTANCE; STIFFNESS; BEHAVIOR; COMPACTION; STABILITY; BACKFILLS;
D O I
10.1016/j.geotexmem.2024.06.005
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
The role of wall facing is crucial in the design of MSE walls. This study employed two centrifuge model tests specifically designed to analyze walls with two distinct facing types: full-height panel facing and modular block facing. Additionally, surcharge loads were applied to these MSE walls to simulate real-world conditions. The findings from these tests revealed that MSE walls with full-height panel facing exhibited superior performance under the combined effects of self-weight and surcharge loads. The measured maximum horizontal displacements in walls with full-height panel facing and modular block facing were about 55% and 85% of those predicted from current design guidelines at EOS3, respectively. The influence of the surcharge loads on the reinforcement loads was found to be substantial for both wall types, especially for the case of model wall with modular block facing, where the reinforcement loads in the upper half of the wall increased by about 30% from EOS2 to EOS3. The insights garnered from this study contribute to a deeper and more nuanced understanding of the impact of facing types on the practical construction and design of MSE walls, offering valuable guidance for future engineering applications.
引用
收藏
页码:1045 / 1053
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[11]  
CREEG, 2019, Code for design of retaining structures of railway earthworks
[12]  
CRFSDIG, 2023, Specifications for soil test of railway engineering
[13]   Evaluation of the effects of facing stiffness and toe resistance on the behavior of GRS walls [J].
Ehrlich, M. ;
Mirmoradi, S. H. .
GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2013, 40 :28-36
[14]   Evaluation of the effect of compaction on the behavior of geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls [J].
Ehrlich, M. ;
Mirmoradi, S. H. ;
Saramago, R. P. .
GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2012, 34 :108-115
[15]   WORKING STRESS DESIGN METHOD FOR REINFORCED SOIL WALLS [J].
EHRLICH, M ;
MITCHELL, JK .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1994, 120 (04) :625-647
[16]   Facing contribution to seismic response of reduced-scale reinforced soil walls [J].
El-Emam, M. M. ;
Bathurst, R. J. .
GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 12 (05) :215-238
[17]   Design of reinforced cohesive soil walls accounting for wall facing contribution to stability [J].
Franco, Yara Barbosa ;
Utili, Stefano ;
Da Silva, Jefferson Lins .
GEOTECHNIQUE, 2022, 73 (08) :667-688
[18]   Numerical analysis of reinforced soil-retaining wall structures with cohesive and granular backfills [J].
Guler, E. ;
Hamderi, M. ;
Demirkan, M. M. .
GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 14 (06) :330-345
[19]   Development and verification of a numerical model for the analysis of geosynthetic-reinforced soil segmental walls under working stress conditions [J].
Hatami, K ;
Bathurst, RJ .
CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 42 (04) :1066-1085
[20]   Influence of toe restraint on reinforced soil segmental walls [J].
Huang, Bingquan ;
Bathurst, Richard J. ;
Hatami, Kianoosh ;
Allen, Tony M. .
CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 47 (08) :885-904