Data fusion for predicting long-term program impacts

被引:1
作者
Robbins, Michael W. [1 ]
Bauhoff, Sebastian [2 ]
Burgette, Lane [1 ]
机构
[1] RAND, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Cambridge, MA USA
关键词
data fusion; health insurance; multiple imputation; Oregon Health Insurance Experiment; surrogate outcomes; MULTIPLE IMPUTATION; MORTALITY; MEDICAID;
D O I
10.1002/sim.10147
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Policymakers often require information on programs' long-term impacts that is not available when decisions are made. For example, while rigorous evidence from the Oregon Health Insurance Experiment (OHIE) shows that having health insurance influences short-term health and financial measures, the impact on long-term outcomes, such as mortality, will not be known for many years following the program's implementation. We demonstrate how data fusion methods may be used address the problem of missing final outcomes and predict long-run impacts of interventions before the requisite data are available. We implement this method by concatenating data on an intervention (such as the OHIE) with auxiliary long-term data and then imputing missing long-term outcomes using short-term surrogate outcomes while approximating uncertainty with replication methods. We use simulations to examine the performance of the methodology and apply the method in a case study. Specifically, we fuse data on the OHIE with data from the National Longitudinal Mortality Study and estimate that being eligible to apply for subsidized health insurance will lead to a statistically significant improvement in long-term mortality.
引用
收藏
页码:3702 / 3722
页数:21
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, NATL LONGITUDINAL MO
[2]  
Athey S., 2020, COMBINING EXPT OBSER
[3]  
Athey S., 2019, The Surrogate Index: Combining Short-Term Proxies to Estimate Long-Term Treatment Effects More Rapidly and Precisely
[4]   The Oregon Experiment - Effects of Medicaid on Clinical Outcomes [J].
Baicker, Katherine ;
Taubman, Sarah L. ;
Allen, Heidi L. ;
Bernstein, Mira ;
Gruber, Jonathan H. ;
Newhouse, Joseph P. ;
Schneider, Eric C. ;
Wright, Bill J. ;
Zaslavsky, Alan M. ;
Finkelstein, Amy N. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2013, 368 (18) :1713-1722
[5]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[6]   Does the Prentice criterion validate surrogate endpoints? [J].
Berger, VW .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2004, 23 (10) :1571-1578
[7]   Nonparametric Bayesian Multiple Imputation for Missing Data Due to Mid-Study Switching of Measurement Methods [J].
Burgette, Lane F. ;
Reiter, Jerome P. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2012, 107 (498) :439-449
[8]   Illustration of 2 Fusion Designs and Estimators [J].
Cole, Stephen R. ;
Edwards, Jessie K. ;
Breskin, Alexander ;
Rosin, Samuel ;
Zivich, Paul N. ;
Shook-Sa, Bonnie E. ;
Hudgens, Michael G. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2023, 192 (03) :467-474
[9]   THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF COUNSELING SMOKERS TO QUIT [J].
CUMMINGS, SR ;
RUBIN, SM ;
OSTER, G .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1989, 261 (01) :75-79
[10]  
Efron B., 1994, An Introduction to the Bootstrap