Prevalence of Proximal Contact Loss between Implant-Supported Prostheses and Adjacent Natural Teeth: An Umbrella Review

被引:5
|
作者
Fathi, Amirhossein [1 ]
Mosharraf, Ramin [1 ]
Ebadian, Behnaz [2 ]
Javan, Mehdi
Isler, Sabire [3 ]
Dezaki, Sara Nasrollahi [4 ]
机构
[1] Isfahan Univ Med Sci, Sch Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Dent Mat Res Ctr, Esfahan, Iran
[2] Isfahan Univ Med Sci, Sch Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Dent Implants Res Ctr, Esfahan, Iran
[3] Istanbul Univ, Dept Prosthodont, Istanbul, Turkiye
[4] Isfahan Univ Med Sci, Sch Dent, Dent Students Res Comm, Esfahan, Iran
关键词
proximal contact loss; implant-supported prostheses; adjacent natural teeth; FIXED DENTAL PROSTHESES; INTERPROXIMAL CONTACT; POSTERIOR REGION; RESTORATIONS;
D O I
10.1055/s-0042-1745771
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Contact loss between the implant prosthesis and adjacent natural teeth is a clinical complication whose overall prevalence is uncertain. Therefore, the main purpose of this umbrella study was to evaluate the extent of contact loss between implant prostheses and adjacent natural teeth. Electronic database of MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar was searched until August 2021 without considering language restrictions and according to Preferred Report Items for Systematic and Meta-Analysis guidelines (preferential reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis). Inclusion criteria were systematic/meta-analysis review articles related to contact loss between implant prostheses and adjacent natural teeth. Inclusion criteria and risk of bias for the selected systematic/meta-analysis review studies were assessed by two or three qualified researchers, and the fourth researcher was used to resolve the ambiguities. From 43 eligible articles, five systematic/meta-analysis review studies were selected for this study. Important information such as the range of contact points, the prevalence, and the location of the contact loss was extracted. Three research studies had a low risk of bias and were considered clinical evidence. Analysis of low-risk studies showed that the superiority of open contact loss was excessive. Prevalence of proximal contact loss was more in mesial contact, especially in the mandibular arch. No significant differences were reported in sex or between the posterior and anterior regions.
引用
收藏
页码:742 / 748
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Material and abutment selection for CAD/CAM implant-supported fixed dental prostheses in partially edentulous patients - A narrative review
    Strasding, Malin
    Marchand, Laurent
    Merino, Elizabeth
    Zarauz, Cristina
    Pitta, Joao
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2024, 35 (08) : 984 - 999
  • [42] Occurrence of Maxillary Central Diastema between Tooth-supported and Implant-supported Prostheses: a 5-year Clinical Follow-up
    Li, De Li
    Li, Shi Ying
    Tang, Zhi Hui
    Wu, Yu Wei
    Li, Liang Zhong
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2019, 22 (01) : 65 - 68
  • [43] Full-Arch, Implant-Supported Monolithic Zirconia Rehabilitations: Pilot Clinical Evaluation of Wear Against Natural or Composite Teeth
    Cardelli, Paolo
    Manobianco, Francesco Pio
    Serafini, Nicola
    Murmura, Giovanna
    Beuer, Florian
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2016, 25 (08): : 629 - 633
  • [44] Orthognathic correction and corticobasal implant-supported prostheses as a treatment modality for partial edentulism with mandibular prognathism: A case report and review of literature
    Ahmad, Abdelnasir G.
    Osman, Motaz
    Awadalkreem, Fadia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY CASE REPORTS, 2022, 95
  • [45] Assessment and aesthetic impact of a long-term vertical discrepancy between the single anterior maxillary implant-supported crown and adjacent teeth: A retrospective cross-sectional study
    Sauvin, Gregoire
    Nurdin, Nathalie
    Bischof, Mark
    Kiliaridis, Stavros
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DENTAL RESEARCH, 2022, 8 (05): : 1109 - 1116
  • [46] Marginal Bone Loss around Implant-Retaining Overdentures versus Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses 12-Month Follow-Up: A Retrospective Study
    Dorj, Odontuya
    Lin, Chin-Kai
    Salamanca, Eisner
    Pan, Yu-Hwa
    Wu, Yi-Fan
    Hsu, Yung-Szu
    Lin, Jerry C. -Y.
    Lin, Hsi-Kuei
    Chang, Wei-Jen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (03)
  • [47] Effects of modifying implant screw access channels on the amount of extruded excess cement and retention of cement-retained implant-supported dental prostheses: A systematic review
    Davoudi, Amin
    Rismanchian, Mansour
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2019, 121 (01) : 52 - 58
  • [48] Clinical outcomes of implant-supported and tooth-supported fixed prostheses fabricated from digital versus analogue impression: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mahat, Nur Safiani
    Shetty, Naresh Yedthare
    Kohli, Shivani
    Jamayet, Nafij Bin
    Patil, Pravinkumar
    EVIDENCE-BASED DENTISTRY, 2023, 24 (03) : 142 - 142
  • [49] Risk factors contributing to interproximal contact loss between an implant crown and a natural tooth
    Pappous, George C.
    Campbell, Stephen
    Goldstein, Gary
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2024,
  • [50] Comparison of technical, biological, and esthetic parameters of ceramic and metal-ceramic implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hu, Meng-Long
    Lin, Hong
    Zhang, You-Dong
    Han, Jian-Min
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2020, 124 (01) : 26 - +