Prevalence of Proximal Contact Loss between Implant-Supported Prostheses and Adjacent Natural Teeth: An Umbrella Review

被引:5
|
作者
Fathi, Amirhossein [1 ]
Mosharraf, Ramin [1 ]
Ebadian, Behnaz [2 ]
Javan, Mehdi
Isler, Sabire [3 ]
Dezaki, Sara Nasrollahi [4 ]
机构
[1] Isfahan Univ Med Sci, Sch Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Dent Mat Res Ctr, Esfahan, Iran
[2] Isfahan Univ Med Sci, Sch Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Dent Implants Res Ctr, Esfahan, Iran
[3] Istanbul Univ, Dept Prosthodont, Istanbul, Turkiye
[4] Isfahan Univ Med Sci, Sch Dent, Dent Students Res Comm, Esfahan, Iran
关键词
proximal contact loss; implant-supported prostheses; adjacent natural teeth; FIXED DENTAL PROSTHESES; INTERPROXIMAL CONTACT; POSTERIOR REGION; RESTORATIONS;
D O I
10.1055/s-0042-1745771
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Contact loss between the implant prosthesis and adjacent natural teeth is a clinical complication whose overall prevalence is uncertain. Therefore, the main purpose of this umbrella study was to evaluate the extent of contact loss between implant prostheses and adjacent natural teeth. Electronic database of MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar was searched until August 2021 without considering language restrictions and according to Preferred Report Items for Systematic and Meta-Analysis guidelines (preferential reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis). Inclusion criteria were systematic/meta-analysis review articles related to contact loss between implant prostheses and adjacent natural teeth. Inclusion criteria and risk of bias for the selected systematic/meta-analysis review studies were assessed by two or three qualified researchers, and the fourth researcher was used to resolve the ambiguities. From 43 eligible articles, five systematic/meta-analysis review studies were selected for this study. Important information such as the range of contact points, the prevalence, and the location of the contact loss was extracted. Three research studies had a low risk of bias and were considered clinical evidence. Analysis of low-risk studies showed that the superiority of open contact loss was excessive. Prevalence of proximal contact loss was more in mesial contact, especially in the mandibular arch. No significant differences were reported in sex or between the posterior and anterior regions.
引用
收藏
页码:742 / 748
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Chairside management of an open proximal contact on an implant-supported ceramic crown using direct composite resin
    Sfondouris, Tassos
    Prestipino, Vincent
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2019, 122 (01) : 1 - 4
  • [32] Frequency of infraposition and missing contact points in implant-supported restorations within natural dentitions over time: A systematic review with meta-analysis
    Papageorgiou, Spyridon N.
    Eliades, Theodore
    Hammerle, Christoph H. F.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2018, 29 : 309 - 325
  • [33] Full-arch implant-supported monolithic zirconia fixed dental prostheses: An updated systematic review
    AlTarawneh, Sandra
    Thalji, Ghadeer
    Cooper, Lyndon
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2021, 14 (01) : 13 - 22
  • [34] Techniques for locating the screw access hole in cement-retained implant-supported prostheses: A systematic review
    Ortega, Nuria Martin
    Banos, Miguel Angel
    Martinez, Juan
    Revilla-Leon, Marta
    Gomez-Polo, Miguel
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2023, 130 (01) : 48 - 58
  • [35] Shear bond strength between gingival composite resin and glazed gingival porcelain for implant-supported prostheses
    Komine, Futoshi
    Kubochi, Kei
    Kimura, Fumiaki
    Kusaba, Kosuke
    Takano, Ryoki
    Matsumura, Hideo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES, 2021, 129 (02)
  • [36] Influence of CAD-CAM manufacturing methods on the accuracy and mechanical properties of implant-supported prostheses: A systematic review
    Ellakany, Passent
    Madi, Marwa
    Elwan, Amira H.
    Alshehri, Turki
    Aljubran, Hussain
    Aly, Nourhan M.
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2024,
  • [37] Evaluation of adjacent tooth displacement in the posterior implant restoration with proximal contact loss by superimposition of digital models
    Jo, Deuk-Won
    Kwon, Min-Jung
    Kim, Jong-Hee
    Kim, Young-Kyun
    Yi, Yang-Jin
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PROSTHODONTICS, 2019, 11 (02) : 88 - 94
  • [38] Evaluating the clinical behavior of veneered zirconia in comparison with monolithic zirconia complete arch implant-supported prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Martakoush-Saleh, Sara
    Salgado-Peralvo, Angel-Orion
    Pena-Cardelles, Juan-Francisco
    Kewalramani, Naresh
    Gallucci, German O.
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2024, 132 (05) : 899 - 912
  • [39] Techniques for retrievability and for registering screw access holes in cement-retained implant-supported prostheses: A scoping review of the literature
    Malpartida-Carrillo, Violeta
    Tinedo-Lopez, Pedro Luis
    Ortiz-Culca, Fernando
    Eugenia Guerrero, Maria
    Amaya-Pajares, Silvia P.
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2020, 123 (03) : 427 - 433
  • [40] Influence of Prosthesis Type and Retention Mechanism on Complications with Fixed Implant-Supported Prostheses: A Systematic Review Applying Multivariate Analyses
    Millen, Christopher
    Braegger, Urs
    Wittneben, Julia-Gabriela
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2015, 30 (01) : 110 - 124