Health professionals implicit bias of patients with low socioeconomic status (SES) and its effects on clinical decision-making: a scoping review

被引:3
|
作者
Job, Claire [1 ]
Adenipekun, Bami [1 ]
Cleves, Anne [1 ]
Gill, Paul [2 ]
Samuriwo, Ray [3 ]
机构
[1] Cardiff Univ, Cardiff, Wales
[2] Northumbria Univ, Dept Nursing Midwifery & Hlth, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England
[3] Edinburgh Napier Univ, Sch Hlth & Social Care, Edinburgh, Scotland
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2024年 / 14卷 / 07期
关键词
Clinical Decision-Making; Health Equity; Stereotyping; Systematic Review; SOCIAL-CLASS BIAS; UNCONSCIOUS RACE; NONMEDICAL INFLUENCES; CARE DISPARITIES; CANCER-TREATMENT; WEAK CRITICISMS; ASSOCIATION; MANAGEMENT; PAIN; CONTRIBUTE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081723
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives Research indicates that people with lower socioeconomic status (SES) receive inferior healthcare and experience poorer health outcomes compared with those with higher SES, in part due to health professional (HP) bias. We conducted a scoping review of the impact of HP bias about SES on clinical decision-making and its effect on the care of adults with lower SES.Design JBI scoping review methods were used to perform a systematic comprehensive search for literature. The scoping review protocol has been published in BMJ Open.Data sources Medline, Embase, ASSIA, Scopus and CINAHL were searched, from the first available start date of the individual database to March 2023. Two independent reviewers filtered and screened papers.Eligibility criteria Studies of all designs were included in this review to provide a comprehensive map of the existing evidence of the impact of HP bias of SES on clinical decision-making and its effect on the care for people with lower SES.Data extraction and synthesis Data were gathered using an adapted JBI data extraction tool for systematic scoping reviews.Results Sixty-seven papers were included from 1975 to 2023. 35 (73%) of the included primary research studies reported an association between HP SES bias and decision-making. Thirteen (27%) of the included primary research studies did not find an association between HP SES bias and decision-making. Stereotyping and bias can adversely affect decision-making when the HP is fatigued or has a high cognitive load. There is evidence of intersectionality which can have a powerful cumulative effect on HP assessment and subsequent decision-making. HP implicit bias may be mitigated through the assertiveness of the patient with low SES.Conclusion HP decision-making is at times influenced by non-medical factors for people of low SES, and assumptions are made based on implicit bias and stereotyping, which compound or exacerbate health inequalities. Research that focuses on decision-making when the HP has a high cognitive load, would help the health community to better understand this potential influence.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Clinical decision-making and the nursing process in digital health systems: An integrated systematic review
    Hants, Laura
    Bail, Kasia
    Paterson, Catherine
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2023, 32 (19-20) : 7010 - 7035
  • [32] The Mapping of Influencing Factors in the Decision-Making of End-of-Life Care Patients: A Systematic Scoping Review
    da Silva, Mauricio de Almeida Pereira
    Corradi-Perini, Carla
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE CARE, 2023, 29 (03) : 234 - 242
  • [33] The role of collaborative decision-making in discharge planning: Perspectives from patients, family members and health professionals
    Gledhill, Kate
    Bucknall, Tracey K.
    Lannin, Natasha A.
    Hanna, Lisa
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2023, 32 (19-20) : 7519 - 7529
  • [34] The Use of Computer-Assisted Case-Based Reasoning to Support Clinical Decision-Making - A Scoping Review
    Noll, Richard
    Schaaf, Jannik
    Storf, Holger
    CASE-BASED REASONING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, ICCBR 2022, 2022, 13405 : 395 - 409
  • [35] Engaging women in decision-making about their heart health: a literature review with patients' perspective
    Bastiany, Alexandra
    Towns, Cindy
    Kimmaliardjuk, Donna May
    Kalenga, Cindy Z.
    Burgess, Sonya N.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2024,
  • [36] Engaging women in decision-making about their heart health: a literature review with patients' perspective
    Bastiany, Alexandra
    Towns, Cindy
    Kimmaliardjuk, Donna May
    Kalenga, Cindy Z.
    Burgess, Sonya N.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 102 (08) : 431 - 441
  • [37] Exploring Health Care Professionals' Perceptions Regarding Shared Clinical Decision-Making in Both Acute and Palliative Cancer Care
    Ullgren, Helena
    Sharp, Lena
    Fransson, Per
    Bergkvist, Karin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (23)
  • [38] The role of shared decision-making in improving adherence to pharmacological treatments in patients with schizophrenia: a clinical review
    Fiorillo, Andrea
    Barlati, Stefano
    Bellomo, Antonello
    Corrivetti, Giulio
    Nicolo, Giuseppe
    Sampogna, Gaia
    Stanga, Valentina
    Veltro, Franco
    Maina, Giuseppe
    Vita, Antonio
    ANNALS OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 19 (01)
  • [39] How are allied health notes used for inpatient care and clinical decision-making? A qualitative exploration of the views of doctors, nurses and allied health professionals
    Pain, Tilley
    Kingston, Gail
    Askern, Janet
    Smith, Rebecca
    Phillips, Sandra
    Bell, Leanne
    HEALTH INFORMATION MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2017, 46 (01) : 23 - 31
  • [40] The experiences of adult patients, families, and healthcare professionals of CPR decision-making conversations in the United Kingdom: A qualitative systematic review
    Hartanto, Michelle
    Moore, Gavin
    Robbins, Timothy
    Suthantirakumar, Risheka
    Slowther, Anne -Marie
    RESUSCITATION PLUS, 2023, 13