Health professionals implicit bias of patients with low socioeconomic status (SES) and its effects on clinical decision-making: a scoping review

被引:3
|
作者
Job, Claire [1 ]
Adenipekun, Bami [1 ]
Cleves, Anne [1 ]
Gill, Paul [2 ]
Samuriwo, Ray [3 ]
机构
[1] Cardiff Univ, Cardiff, Wales
[2] Northumbria Univ, Dept Nursing Midwifery & Hlth, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England
[3] Edinburgh Napier Univ, Sch Hlth & Social Care, Edinburgh, Scotland
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2024年 / 14卷 / 07期
关键词
Clinical Decision-Making; Health Equity; Stereotyping; Systematic Review; SOCIAL-CLASS BIAS; UNCONSCIOUS RACE; NONMEDICAL INFLUENCES; CARE DISPARITIES; CANCER-TREATMENT; WEAK CRITICISMS; ASSOCIATION; MANAGEMENT; PAIN; CONTRIBUTE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081723
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives Research indicates that people with lower socioeconomic status (SES) receive inferior healthcare and experience poorer health outcomes compared with those with higher SES, in part due to health professional (HP) bias. We conducted a scoping review of the impact of HP bias about SES on clinical decision-making and its effect on the care of adults with lower SES.Design JBI scoping review methods were used to perform a systematic comprehensive search for literature. The scoping review protocol has been published in BMJ Open.Data sources Medline, Embase, ASSIA, Scopus and CINAHL were searched, from the first available start date of the individual database to March 2023. Two independent reviewers filtered and screened papers.Eligibility criteria Studies of all designs were included in this review to provide a comprehensive map of the existing evidence of the impact of HP bias of SES on clinical decision-making and its effect on the care for people with lower SES.Data extraction and synthesis Data were gathered using an adapted JBI data extraction tool for systematic scoping reviews.Results Sixty-seven papers were included from 1975 to 2023. 35 (73%) of the included primary research studies reported an association between HP SES bias and decision-making. Thirteen (27%) of the included primary research studies did not find an association between HP SES bias and decision-making. Stereotyping and bias can adversely affect decision-making when the HP is fatigued or has a high cognitive load. There is evidence of intersectionality which can have a powerful cumulative effect on HP assessment and subsequent decision-making. HP implicit bias may be mitigated through the assertiveness of the patient with low SES.Conclusion HP decision-making is at times influenced by non-medical factors for people of low SES, and assumptions are made based on implicit bias and stereotyping, which compound or exacerbate health inequalities. Research that focuses on decision-making when the HP has a high cognitive load, would help the health community to better understand this potential influence.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Clinical decision support system for clinical nurses' decision-making on nurse-to-patient assignment: a scoping review protocol
    Kwon, Hyunjeong
    Lee, Dayeon
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [22] Interventions to improve oncofertility knowledge and decision-making in patients with low health literacy: A systematic review
    Ong, Cassandra
    Li, Anna D.
    Marino, Jennifer L.
    Peate, Michelle
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2024, 119
  • [23] Clinical decision support systems for multidisciplinary team decision-making in patients with solid cancer: Composition of an implementation model based on a scoping review
    Hendriks, Mathijs P.
    Jager, Agnes
    Ebben, Kees C. W. J.
    Til, Janine A. van
    Siesling, Sabine
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2024, 195
  • [24] Nurses' Clinical Decision-Making About Pressure Injury Prevention in Hospital Settings: A Scoping Review
    Cordina, Joanne
    Rolls, Kaye
    Sim, Jenny
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2025,
  • [25] Factors influencing treatment decision-making for cancer patients in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review
    Salek, Marta
    Silverstein, Allison
    Tilly, Alyssa
    Gassant, Pascale Yola
    Gunasekera, Sanjeeva
    Hordofa, Diriba Fufa
    Hesson, Donna
    Duffy, Caitlyn
    Malik, Nauman
    McNeil, Michael
    Force, Lisa M.
    Bhakta, Nickhill
    Rodin, Danielle
    Kaye, Erica C.
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (17): : 18133 - 18152
  • [26] Factors influencing clinical decision making used by mental health nurses to provide provisional diagnosis: A scoping review
    Campbell, Katrina
    Massey, Deb
    Broadbent, Marc
    Clarke, Karen-Ann
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2019, 28 (02) : 407 - 424
  • [27] Factors influencing family involvement in treatment decision-making for older patients with cancer: A scoping review
    Dijkman, Bea L.
    Luttik, Marie Louise
    Van der Wal-Huisman, Hanneke
    Paans, Wolter
    van Leeuwen, Barbara L.
    JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 2022, 13 (04) : 391 - 397
  • [28] Clinical decision-making and dispensing performance in pharmacy students and its relationship to executive function and implicit memory
    Scutt, Greg
    Williams, Sian
    Auyeung, Vivian
    Overall, Andrew
    EXPLORATORY RESEARCH IN CLINICAL AND SOCIAL PHARMACY, 2022, 5
  • [29] Clinical decision-making approaches by health caregivers of patients with COVID-19
    Taghadosi, Mohsen
    Ajorpaz, Neda Mirbagher
    Aghajani, Mohammad
    BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 2020, 7 (10): : 4056 - 4057
  • [30] The use of personal digital assistants in clinical decision making by health care professionals: A systematic review
    Divall, Pip
    Camosso-Stefinovic, Janette
    Baker, Richard
    HEALTH INFORMATICS JOURNAL, 2013, 19 (01) : 16 - 28