Health professionals implicit bias of patients with low socioeconomic status (SES) and its effects on clinical decision-making: a scoping review

被引:3
|
作者
Job, Claire [1 ]
Adenipekun, Bami [1 ]
Cleves, Anne [1 ]
Gill, Paul [2 ]
Samuriwo, Ray [3 ]
机构
[1] Cardiff Univ, Cardiff, Wales
[2] Northumbria Univ, Dept Nursing Midwifery & Hlth, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England
[3] Edinburgh Napier Univ, Sch Hlth & Social Care, Edinburgh, Scotland
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2024年 / 14卷 / 07期
关键词
Clinical Decision-Making; Health Equity; Stereotyping; Systematic Review; SOCIAL-CLASS BIAS; UNCONSCIOUS RACE; NONMEDICAL INFLUENCES; CARE DISPARITIES; CANCER-TREATMENT; WEAK CRITICISMS; ASSOCIATION; MANAGEMENT; PAIN; CONTRIBUTE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081723
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives Research indicates that people with lower socioeconomic status (SES) receive inferior healthcare and experience poorer health outcomes compared with those with higher SES, in part due to health professional (HP) bias. We conducted a scoping review of the impact of HP bias about SES on clinical decision-making and its effect on the care of adults with lower SES.Design JBI scoping review methods were used to perform a systematic comprehensive search for literature. The scoping review protocol has been published in BMJ Open.Data sources Medline, Embase, ASSIA, Scopus and CINAHL were searched, from the first available start date of the individual database to March 2023. Two independent reviewers filtered and screened papers.Eligibility criteria Studies of all designs were included in this review to provide a comprehensive map of the existing evidence of the impact of HP bias of SES on clinical decision-making and its effect on the care for people with lower SES.Data extraction and synthesis Data were gathered using an adapted JBI data extraction tool for systematic scoping reviews.Results Sixty-seven papers were included from 1975 to 2023. 35 (73%) of the included primary research studies reported an association between HP SES bias and decision-making. Thirteen (27%) of the included primary research studies did not find an association between HP SES bias and decision-making. Stereotyping and bias can adversely affect decision-making when the HP is fatigued or has a high cognitive load. There is evidence of intersectionality which can have a powerful cumulative effect on HP assessment and subsequent decision-making. HP implicit bias may be mitigated through the assertiveness of the patient with low SES.Conclusion HP decision-making is at times influenced by non-medical factors for people of low SES, and assumptions are made based on implicit bias and stereotyping, which compound or exacerbate health inequalities. Research that focuses on decision-making when the HP has a high cognitive load, would help the health community to better understand this potential influence.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Physician gender as a source of implicit bias affecting clinical decision-making processes: a scoping review
    Champagne-Langabeer, Tiffany
    Hedges, Andrew L.
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [2] Cognitive bias during clinical decision-making and its influence on patient outcomes in the emergency department: A scoping review
    Jala, Sheila
    Fry, Margaret
    Elliott, Rosalind
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2023, 32 (19-20) : 7076 - 7085
  • [3] Interprofessional clinical decision-making process in health: A scoping review
    Bouchez, Tiphanie
    Cagnon, Clemence
    Hamouche, Gouraya
    Majdoub, Marouan
    Charlet, Jean
    Schuers, Matthieu
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2024, 80 (03) : 884 - 907
  • [4] Educational strategies in the health professions to mitigate cognitive and implicit bias impact on decision making: a scoping review
    Thompson, John
    Bujalka, Helena
    McKeever, Stephen
    Lipscomb, Adrienne
    Moore, Sonya
    Hill, Nicole
    Kinney, Sharon
    Cham, Kwang Meng
    Martin, Joanne
    Bowers, Patrick
    Gerdtz, Marie
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2023, 23 (01) : 455
  • [5] Educational strategies in the health professions to mitigate cognitive and implicit bias impact on decision making: a scoping review
    John Thompson
    Helena Bujalka
    Stephen McKeever
    Adrienne Lipscomb
    Sonya Moore
    Nicole Hill
    Sharon Kinney
    Kwang Meng Cham
    Joanne Martin
    Patrick Bowers
    Marie Gerdtz
    BMC Medical Education, 23
  • [6] Cognitive and implicit biases in nurses' judgment and decision-making: A scoping review
    Thirsk, M. Lorraine
    Panchuk, T. Julia
    Stahlke, Sarah
    Hagtvedt, Reidar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2022, 133
  • [7] Context factors in clinical decision-making: a scoping review
    Schuler, Katharina
    Jung, Ian-C.
    Zerlik, Maria
    Hahn, Waldemar
    Sedlmayr, Martin
    Sedlmayr, Brita
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [8] A scoping review of distributed cognition in acute care clinical decision-making
    Wilson, Eric
    Daniel, Michelle
    Rao, Aditi
    Torre, Dario
    Durning, Steven
    Anderson, Clare
    Goldhaber, Nicole H.
    Townsend, Whitney
    Seifert, Colleen M.
    DIAGNOSIS, 2023, 10 (02) : 68 - 88
  • [9] A Systematic Review of the Impact of Physician Implicit Racial Bias on Clinical Decision Making
    Dehon, Erin
    Weiss, Nicole
    Jones, Jonathan
    Faulconer, Whitney
    Hinton, Elizabeth
    Sterling, Sarah
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2017, 24 (08) : 895 - 904
  • [10] Digital Twins for Clinical and Operational Decision-Making: Scoping Review
    Riahi, Vahid
    Diouf, Ibrahima
    Khanna, Sankalp
    Boyle, Justin
    Hassanzadeh, Hamed
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2025, 27