Design and Evaluation of Trustworthy Knowledge Tracing Model for Intelligent Tutoring System

被引:0
作者
Lu, Yu [1 ]
Wang, Deliang [2 ]
Chen, Penghe [1 ]
Zhang, Zhi [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, Fac Educ, Adv Innovat Ctr Future Educ, Sch Educ Technol, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Hong Kong, Fac Educ, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES | 2024年 / 17卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Education; Predictive models; Data models; Analytical models; Mathematical models; Deep learning; Explainable artificial intelligence (xAI); intelligent tutoring system (ITS); knowledge tracing (KT) model; trustworthy artificial intelligence (AI);
D O I
10.1109/TLT.2024.3403135
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Amid the rapid evolution of artificial intelligence (AI), the intricate model structures and opaque decision-making processes of AI-based systems have raised the trustworthy issues in education. We, therefore, first propose a novel three-layer knowledge tracing model designed to address trustworthiness for an intelligent tutoring system. Each layer is crafted to tackle a specific challenge: transparency, explainability, and accountability. We have introduced an explainable AI (xAI) approach to offer technical interpreting information, validated by the established educational theories and principles. The validated interpreting information is subsequently transitioned from its technical context into educational insights, which are then incorporated into the newly designed user interface. Our evaluations indicate that an intelligent tutoring system, when equipped with the designed trustworthy knowledge tracing model, significantly enhances user trust and knowledge from the perspectives of both teachers and students. This study, thus, contributes a tangible solution that utilizes the xAI approach as the enabling technology to construct trustworthy systems or tools in education.
引用
收藏
页码:1701 / 1716
页数:16
相关论文
共 83 条
  • [1] Knowledge Tracing with Sequential Key-Value Memory Networks
    Abdelrahman, Ghodai
    Wang, Qing
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 42ND INTERNATIONAL ACM SIGIR CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN INFORMATION RETRIEVAL (SIGIR '19), 2019, : 175 - 184
  • [2] Alvarez-Melis D, 2018, ADV NEUR IN, V31
  • [3] Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education
    Andy Nguyen
    Ngo, Ha Ngan
    Hong, Yvonne
    Dang, Belle
    Bich-Phuong Thi Nguyen
    [J]. EDUCATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2023, 28 (04) : 4221 - 4241
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2017, Asilomar AI principles
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2010, Learning Spaces: InterdisciplinaryApplied Mathematics
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2020, ISO 24028:2020
  • [7] LEARNING-CURVES IN MANUFACTURING
    ARGOTE, L
    EPPLE, D
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1990, 247 (4945) : 920 - 924
  • [8] Advancing the Design and Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Education through Continuous Improvement
    Bhimdiwala, Ayesha
    Neri, Rebecca Colina
    Gomez, Louis M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN EDUCATION, 2022, 32 (03) : 756 - 782
  • [9] Binder Alexander, 2016, International Conference on Information Science and Applications (ICISA) 2016. LNEE 376, P913, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-0557-2_87
  • [10] One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?
    Braun, Virginia
    Clarke, Victoria
    [J]. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 18 (03) : 328 - 352