Portable Air Cleaner Usage and Particulate Matter Exposure Reduction in an Environmental Justice Community: A Pilot Study

被引:2
作者
McIntyre, Alina M. [1 ]
Scammell, Madeleine K. [1 ]
Kinney, Patrick L. [1 ]
Khosla, Kiran [1 ]
Benton, Layne [2 ]
Bongiovanni, Roseann [2 ]
McCannon, Jessica [3 ]
Milando, Chad W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Hlth, 715 Albany St 4th Fl Off 442, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[2] Greenroots Inc, Chelsea, MA USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Mass Gen Brigham, Boston, MA USA
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH INSIGHTS | 2024年 / 18卷
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Indoor air quality; particulate matter; portable air cleaner; HEPA filter; asthma; community-engaged research; academic-community partnership; intervention; environmental justice; VENTILATION;
D O I
10.1177/11786302241258587
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Particulate matter (PM) exposure is associated with adverse health outcomes, including respiratory illness. A large fraction of exposure to airborne contaminants occurs in the home. This study, conducted over 5 months in a community with high asthma rates (Chelsea, MA, USA), investigated the use of portable air cleaners (PACs) to reduce indoor PM. Seven asthma-affected households participated, receiving a PAC (Austin Air Health Mate HEPA filter), a QuantAQ sensor to measure PM1, PM2.5, PM10 (mu g/m3), and a HOBO plug-load data logger to track PAC usage. Results describe hourly and daily PM concentrations and PAC usage for each household. Hourly average PM concentrations decreased when PACs were turned on (vs. when they were turned off) across households during the study period: PM1 decreased by 0.46 mu g/m3, PM2.5 decreased by 0.69 mu g/m3, and PM10 decreased by 3.22 mu g/m3. PAC usage varied for each household, including constant usage in one household and only usage at certain times of day in others. Higher filtration settings led to lower PM, with significant reductions in some, but not all, homes. Our findings highlight some difficulties in implementing household PAC interventions, yet also provide evidence to support household-level interventions to reduce PM and other indoor sources of air pollution. We also highlight academic-community partnerships as contributing to evidence-based solutions.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
American Thoracic Society, 2024, Asthma Control Test (ACT)
[2]  
[Anonymous], Owner's Manual
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Air quality guidelines global update 2005
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2023, Particulate matter (PM) basics
[5]  
ASHRAE and American National Standards Institute, 2020, Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy
[6]   Reducing burden of disease from residential indoor air exposures in Europe (HEALTHVENT project) [J].
Asikainen, Arja ;
Carrer, Paolo ;
Kephalopoulos, Stylianos ;
Fernandes, Eduardo de Oliveira ;
Wargocki, Pawel ;
Hanninen, Otto .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 2016, 15
[7]  
Asthma Overview, 2020, Massachusetts environmental public health tracking
[8]  
Azevedo A., 2022, PLoS One, V17
[9]   Infiltration of forest fire and residential wood smoke: an evaluation of air cleaner effectiveness [J].
Barn, Prabjit ;
Larson, Timothy ;
Noullett, Melanie ;
Kennedy, Susan ;
Copes, Ray ;
Brauer, Michael .
JOURNAL OF EXPOSURE SCIENCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2008, 18 (05) :503-511
[10]   Long duration tests of room air filters in cigarette smokers' homes [J].
Batterman, S ;
Godwin, C ;
Jia, CR .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 39 (18) :7260-7268