Not All Frailty Assessments Are Created Equal: Comparability of Electronic Health Data-Based Frailty Assessments in Assessing Older People in Residential Care

被引:0
作者
Kong, Jonathan [1 ,2 ]
Trinh, Kelly [3 ]
Hammill, Kathrine [4 ]
Chen, Carla Chia-Ming [1 ]
机构
[1] James Cook Univ, 1 James Cook Dr, Douglas, Qld 4811, Australia
[2] Helping Hand Aged Care, Tranmere, SA, Australia
[3] CSIRO, Data61, Res Way, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[4] Enable Me Occupat Therapy, Moorebank, NSW, Australia
关键词
frailty; aged care; assessment; electronic health records; NH SCALE; INDEX; RELIABILITY; ADULTS; PREVALENCE; VALIDATION; INDICATOR;
D O I
10.1177/10998004241254459
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Objectives: To evaluate the comparability of frailty assessment tools - the electronic frailty index (eFI), retrospective electronic frailty index (reFI), and clinical frailty scale (CFS) - in older residents of care facilities. Methods: Data from 813 individuals aged 65 or older, with frailty and co-morbidities, collected between 2022 and 2023, were analysed using various statistical methods. Results: The results showed significant differences in frailty classification among the tools: 78.3% were identified as moderately to severely frail by eFI, 59.6% by reFI, and 92.1% by CFS. Statistical tests confirmed significant differences (p < .05) in their assessments, indicating variability in measurement methods. Discussion: This study advances the understanding of frailty assessment within aged-care settings, highlighting the differences in the efficacy of these assessment tools. It underscores the challenges in frailty assessments and emphasizes the need for continuous refinement of assessment methods to address the diverse facets of frailty in aged care.
引用
收藏
页码:526 / 536
页数:11
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] A cross-sectional study examining convergent validity of a frailty index based on electronic medical records in a Canadian primary care program
    Abbasi, Marjan
    Khera, Sheny
    Dabravolskaj, Julia
    Vandermeer, Ben
    Theou, Olga
    Rolfson, Darryl
    Clegg, Andrew
    [J]. BMC GERIATRICS, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [2] Multidimensional structure of the Groningen Frailty Indicator in community-dwelling older people
    Bielderman, Annemiek
    van der Schans, Cees P.
    van Lieshout, Marie-Rose J.
    de Greef, Mathieu H. G.
    Boersma, Froukje
    Krijnen, Wim P.
    Steverink, Nardi
    [J]. BMC GERIATRICS, 2013, 13
  • [3] Fried frailty phenotype assessment components as applied to geriatric inpatients
    Bieniek, Joanna
    Wilczynski, Krzysztof
    Szewieczek, Jan
    [J]. CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS IN AGING, 2016, 11 : 453 - 459
  • [4] The Convergent Validity of the electronic Frailty Index (eFI) with the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS)
    Broad, Antoinette
    Carter, Ben
    Mckelvie, Sara
    Hewitt, Jonathan
    [J]. GERIATRICS, 2020, 5 (04) : 1 - 6
  • [5] Convergent validity of the electronic frailty index
    Brundle, Caroline
    Heaven, Anne
    Brown, Lesley
    Teale, Elizabeth
    Young, John
    West, Robert
    Clegg, Andrew
    [J]. AGE AND AGEING, 2019, 48 (01) : 152 - 156
  • [6] Buckinx F, 2017, J FRALITY AGING, V6, P122, DOI 10.14283/jfa.2017.20
  • [7] Frailty syndrome: an overview
    Chen, Xujiao
    Mao, Genxiang
    Leng, Sean X.
    [J]. CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS IN AGING, 2014, 9 : 433 - 441
  • [8] Development and validation of an electronic frailty index using routine primary care electronic health record data
    Clegg, Andrew
    Bates, Chris
    Young, John
    Ryan, Ronan
    Nichols, Linda
    Teale, Elizabeth Ann
    Mohammed, Mohammed A.
    Parry, John
    Marshall, Tom
    [J]. AGE AND AGEING, 2016, 45 (03) : 353 - 360
  • [9] Identifying frailty: do the Frailty Index and Groningen Frailty Indicator cover different clinical perspectives? a cross-sectional study
    Drubbel, Irene
    Bleijenberg, Nienke
    Kranenburg, Guido
    Eijkemans, Rene J. C.
    Schuurmans, Marieke J.
    de Wit, Niek J.
    Numans, Mattijs E.
    [J]. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2013, 14
  • [10] Eagar K, 2019, AUSTR NATL AGED CARE