A unified framework for evaluating the resilience of critical infrastructure: Delphi survey approach

被引:9
作者
Rathnayaka, Bawantha [1 ]
Robert, Dilan [1 ]
Adikariwattage, Varuna [2 ]
Siriwardana, Chandana [3 ]
Meegahapola, Lasantha [4 ]
Setunge, Sujeeva [1 ]
Amaratunga, Dilanthi [5 ]
机构
[1] Royal Melbourne Inst Technol RMIT Univ, Sch Engn, Civil Engn Dept, Melbourne, Vic 3001, Australia
[2] Univ Moratuwa, Dept Civil Engn, Moratuwa 10400, Sri Lanka
[3] Massey Univ, Sch Built Environm, Auckland 0632, New Zealand
[4] Royal Melbourne Inst Technol RMIT Univ, Sch Engn, Elect Engn Dept, Melbourne, Vic 3001, Australia
[5] Univ Huddersfield, Global Disaster Resilience Ctr, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, England
关键词
Critical infrastructure; Resilience; Capacity; Resilience attributes; Resilience assessment; Delphi survey; DISASTER RESILIENCE; NATURAL DISASTERS; URBAN RESILIENCE; SYSTEM; INDICATORS; SIMULATION; METRICS; TOOLS; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104598
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
This study advocates establishing an indicator system for Critical Infrastructure (CI) resilience assessment to ensure consistency and comparability in future endeavors. Resilience has emerged as a fundamental framework for effectively managing the performance of CIs in response to the challenges posed by disaster events. However, it is evident that a lack of uniformity exists in the choice and standardization of resilience assessment across the identified frameworks. This paper proposes key attributes for facilitating resilience assessment of CIs using an in-depth literature survey for identification and two rounds of Delphi survey in the Sri Lankan context for their verification. The literature survey has analyzed the resilience assessment attributes under four types of capacities: planning (anticipative), absorptive, restorative, and adaptive. Twenty-seven resilience attributes (Planning: 6; Absorptive: 12; Restorative: 6; Adaptive: 3) under different capacities were identified, including sub-indicators for evaluating each resilience attribute. Outcomes of the Delphi survey were analyzed through descriptive statistics. The proposed attributes received high levels of agreement from the experts, indicating their suitability and applicability for assessing the resilience of the CIs. The mean ratings of the attributes varied from 4.0 to 5.0, with the majority exceeding 4.5 out of 5. The evaluation of these attributes will be useful for assessing the resilience capacity of the CIs and thereby to model the overall resilience of the CIs. The results of this study will provide a solid basis for formulating hypotheses in future research aimed at assessing CI resilience.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 136 条
[11]  
[Anonymous], Critical infrastructure
[12]   Resilience assessment framework for critical infrastructure in a multi-hazard environment: Case study on transport assets [J].
Argyroudis, Sotirios A. ;
Mitoulis, Stergios A. ;
Hofer, Lorenzo ;
Zanini, Mariano Angelo ;
Tubaldi, Enrico ;
Frangopol, Dan M. .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 714
[13]   Operationalizing a concept: The systematic review of composite indicator building for measuring community disaster resilience [J].
Asadzadeh, A. ;
Koetter, T. ;
Salehi, P. ;
Birkmann, J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2017, 25 :147-162
[14]  
Ashrafi B., 2022, 16 INT C PROB SAF AS
[15]   Developing a social sustainability assessment framework [J].
Atanda, Jubril Olakitan .
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2019, 44 :237-252
[16]  
B. R. To and F. Uncertainties, CLIMATE AND DISASTER RESILIENT INFRASTRUCTURE: BUILDING RESILIENCE TO FUTURE UNCERTAINTIES
[17]   Resilience and Sustainability of Civil Infrastructure: Toward a Unified Approach [J].
Bocchini, Paolo ;
Frangopol, Dan M. ;
Ummenhofer, Thomas ;
Zinke, Tim .
JOURNAL OF INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS, 2014, 20 (02)
[18]   Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples [J].
Campbell, Steve ;
Greenwood, Melanie ;
Prior, Sarah ;
Shearer, Toniele ;
Walkem, Kerrie ;
Young, Sarah ;
Bywaters, Danielle ;
Walker, Kim .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN NURSING, 2020, 25 (08) :652-661
[19]   Urban resilience assessment from the multidimensional perspective using dynamic Bayesian network: A case study of Fujian Province, China [J].
Chen, Xing-lin ;
Yu, Long-xing ;
Lin, Wei-dong ;
Yang, Fu-qiang ;
Li, Yi-ping ;
Tao, Jing ;
Cheng, Shuo .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2023, 238
[20]   On a Modeling Approach to Analyze Resilience of a Smart Grid Infrastructure [J].
Chiaradonna, Silvano ;
Di Giandomenico, Felicita ;
Murru, Nadir .
2014 TENTH EUROPEAN DEPENDABLE COMPUTING CONFERENCE (EDCC), 2014, :166-177