A unified framework for evaluating the resilience of critical infrastructure: Delphi survey approach

被引:4
作者
Rathnayaka, Bawantha [1 ]
Robert, Dilan [1 ]
Adikariwattage, Varuna [2 ]
Siriwardana, Chandana [3 ]
Meegahapola, Lasantha [4 ]
Setunge, Sujeeva [1 ]
Amaratunga, Dilanthi [5 ]
机构
[1] Royal Melbourne Inst Technol RMIT Univ, Sch Engn, Civil Engn Dept, Melbourne, Vic 3001, Australia
[2] Univ Moratuwa, Dept Civil Engn, Moratuwa 10400, Sri Lanka
[3] Massey Univ, Sch Built Environm, Auckland 0632, New Zealand
[4] Royal Melbourne Inst Technol RMIT Univ, Sch Engn, Elect Engn Dept, Melbourne, Vic 3001, Australia
[5] Univ Huddersfield, Global Disaster Resilience Ctr, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, England
关键词
Critical infrastructure; Resilience; Capacity; Resilience attributes; Resilience assessment; Delphi survey; DISASTER RESILIENCE; NATURAL DISASTERS; URBAN RESILIENCE; SYSTEM; INDICATORS; SIMULATION; METRICS; TOOLS; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104598
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
This study advocates establishing an indicator system for Critical Infrastructure (CI) resilience assessment to ensure consistency and comparability in future endeavors. Resilience has emerged as a fundamental framework for effectively managing the performance of CIs in response to the challenges posed by disaster events. However, it is evident that a lack of uniformity exists in the choice and standardization of resilience assessment across the identified frameworks. This paper proposes key attributes for facilitating resilience assessment of CIs using an in-depth literature survey for identification and two rounds of Delphi survey in the Sri Lankan context for their verification. The literature survey has analyzed the resilience assessment attributes under four types of capacities: planning (anticipative), absorptive, restorative, and adaptive. Twenty-seven resilience attributes (Planning: 6; Absorptive: 12; Restorative: 6; Adaptive: 3) under different capacities were identified, including sub-indicators for evaluating each resilience attribute. Outcomes of the Delphi survey were analyzed through descriptive statistics. The proposed attributes received high levels of agreement from the experts, indicating their suitability and applicability for assessing the resilience of the CIs. The mean ratings of the attributes varied from 4.0 to 5.0, with the majority exceeding 4.5 out of 5. The evaluation of these attributes will be useful for assessing the resilience capacity of the CIs and thereby to model the overall resilience of the CIs. The results of this study will provide a solid basis for formulating hypotheses in future research aimed at assessing CI resilience.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 136 条
  • [1] Al-Dahidi S., 2015, 25 EUR SAF REL C ESR, P2703, DOI [10.1201/b19094, DOI 10.1201/B19094]
  • [2] Self-determination mini-theories in second language learning: A systematic review of three decades of research
    Al-Hoorie, Ali H.
    Oga-Baldwin, W. L. Quint
    Hiver, Phil
    Vitta, Joseph P.
    [J]. LANGUAGE TEACHING RESEARCH, 2022,
  • [4] Assessing Resilience of Urban Critical Infrastructure Networks: A Case Study of Ahvaz, Iran
    Alizadeh, Hadi
    Sharifi, Ayyoob
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (09)
  • [5] Risk-Based Criticality Assessment for Smart Critical Infrastructures
    Almaleh, Abdulaziz
    Tipper, David
    [J]. INFRASTRUCTURES, 2022, 7 (01)
  • [6] Developing a Holistic Resilience Framework for Critical Infrastructure Networks of Buildings and Communities in Saudi Arabia
    Alyami, Saleh H. H.
    Abd El Aal, Ahmed K. K.
    Alqahtany, Ali
    Aldossary, Naief A. A.
    Jamil, Rehan
    Almohassen, Abdulaziz
    Alzenifeer, Badran M.
    Kamh, Hussien M. M.
    Fenais, Amr S. S.
    Alsalem, Ali H. H.
    [J]. BUILDINGS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [7] The human role in tools for improving robustness and resilience of critical infrastructures
    Amantini, Aladino
    Choras, Michal
    D'Antonio, Salvatore
    Egozcue, Elyoenai
    Germanus, Daniel
    Hutter, Reinhard
    [J]. COGNITION TECHNOLOGY & WORK, 2012, 14 (02) : 143 - 155
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2014, Cities and Climate Change
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2019, GLOB ASS REP DIS RIS
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2015, Sendai Framework for disaster risk reduction 2015 -2030