Automated segmentation in pelvic radiotherapy: A comprehensive evaluation of ATLAS-, machine learning-, and deep learning-based models

被引:0
作者
Bordigoni, B. [1 ]
Trivellato, S. [1 ]
Pellegrini, R. [2 ]
Meregalli, S. [4 ]
Bonetto, E. [4 ]
Belmonte, M. [3 ,4 ]
Castellano, M. [3 ,4 ]
Panizza, D. [1 ,3 ]
Arcangeli, S. [3 ,4 ]
De Ponti, E. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Fdn IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Med Phys, Monza, Italy
[2] Elekta AB, Med Affairs, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Univ Milano Bicocca, Sch Med & Surg, Milan, Italy
[4] Fdn IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Radiat Oncol, Monza, Italy
来源
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2024年 / 125卷
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Deep learning; Automated contouring; CLINICAL TARGET VOLUME; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; AUTO-SEGMENTATION; RADIATION-THERAPY; RISK SEGMENTATION; AT-RISK; CANCER; ORGANS; DELINEATION; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104486
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Artificial intelligence can standardize and automatize highly demanding procedures, such as manual segmentation, especially in an anatomical site as common as the pelvis. This study investigated four automated segmentation tools on computed tomography (CT) images in female and male pelvic radiotherapy (RT) starting from simpler and well-known atlas-based methods to the most recent neural networks-based algorithms. The evaluation included quantitative, qualitative and time efficiency assessments. A mono-institutional consecutive series of 40 cervical cancer and 40 prostate cancer structure sets were retrospectively selected. After a preparatory phase, the remaining 20 testing sets per each site were auto-segmented by the atlas-based model STAPLE, a Random Forest-based model, and two Deep Learning-based tools (DL), MVision and LimbusAI. Setting manual segmentation as the Ground Truth, 200 structure sets were compared in terms of Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff Distance (HD), and Distance-to-Agreement Portion (DAP). Automated segmentation and manual correction durations were recorded. Expert clinicians performed a qualitative evaluation. In cervical cancer CTs, DL outperformed the other tools with higher quantitative metrics, qualitative scores, and shorter correction times. On the other hand, in prostate cancer CTs, the performance across all the analyzed tools was comparable in terms of both quantitative and qualitative metrics. Such discrepancy in performance outcome could be explained by the wide range of anatomical variability in cervical cancer with respect to the strict bladder and rectum filling preparation in prostate Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT). Decreasing segmentation times can reduce the burden of pelvic radiation therapy routine in an automated workflow.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Fully automated organ segmentation in male pelvic CT images [J].
Balagopal, Anjali ;
Kazemifar, Samaneh ;
Dan Nguyen ;
Lin, Mu-Han ;
Hannan, Raquibul ;
Owrangi, Amir ;
Jiang, Steve .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2018, 63 (24)
[2]   Evaluation of deep learning-based autosegmentation in breast cancer radiotherapy [J].
Byun, Hwa Kyung ;
Chang, Jee Suk ;
Choi, Min Seo ;
Chun, Jaehee ;
Jung, Jinhong ;
Jeong, Chiyoung ;
Kim, Jin Sung ;
Chang, Yongjin ;
Chung, Seung Yeun ;
Lee, Seungryul ;
Kim, Yong Bae .
RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2021, 16 (01)
[3]   Clinical validation of an automatic atlas-based segmentation tool for male pelvis CT images [J].
Casati, Marta ;
Piffer, Stefano ;
Calusi, Silvia ;
Marrazzo, Livia ;
Simontacchi, Gabriele ;
Di Cataldo, Vanessa ;
Greto, Daniela ;
Desideri, Isacco ;
Vernaleone, Marco ;
Francolini, Giulio ;
Livi, Lorenzo ;
Pallotta, Stefania .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 23 (03)
[4]   Methodological approach to create an atlas using a commercial auto-contouring software [J].
Casati, Marta ;
Piffer, Stefano ;
Calusi, Silvia ;
Marrazzo, Livia ;
Simontacchi, Gabriele ;
Di Cataldo, Vanessa ;
Greto, Daniela ;
Desideri, Isacco ;
Vernaleone, Marco ;
Francolini, Giulio ;
Livi, Lorenzo ;
Pallotta, Stefania .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 21 (12) :219-230
[5]   Role of artificial intelligence in brain tumour imaging [J].
Chukwujindu, Ezekiel ;
Faiz, Hafsa ;
AI-Douri, Sara ;
Faiz, Khunsa ;
De Sequeira, Alexandra .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 176
[6]   Comprehensive clinical evaluation of deep learning-based auto-segmentation for radiotherapy in patients with cervical cancer [J].
Chung, Seung Yeun ;
Chang, Jee Suk ;
Kim, Yong Bae .
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
[7]   A survey of medical dosimetrists? perceptions of efficiency and consistency of auto-contouring software [J].
Coffey, Amber ;
Moreno, Jose ;
Lenards, Nishele ;
Hunzeker, Ashley ;
Tobler, Matt .
MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2022, 47 (04) :312-317
[8]   Impact of deviations in target volume delineation - Time for a new RTQA approach? [J].
Cox, Samantha ;
Cleves, Anne ;
Clementel, Enrico ;
Miles, Elizabeth ;
Staffurth, John ;
Gwynne, Sarah .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 137 :1-8
[9]   Artificial Intelligence in magnetic Resonance guided Radiotherapy: Medical and physical considerations on state of art and future perspectives [J].
Cusumano, Davide ;
Boldrini, Luca ;
Dhont, Jennifer ;
Fiorino, Claudio ;
Green, Olga ;
Gungor, Gorkem ;
Jornet, Nuria ;
Klueter, Sebastian ;
Landry, Guillaume ;
Mattiucci, Gian Carlo ;
Placidi, Lorenzo ;
Reynaert, Nick ;
Ruggieri, Ruggero ;
Tanadini-Lang, Stephanie ;
Thorwarth, Daniela ;
Yadav, Poonam ;
Yang, Yingli ;
Valentini, Vincenzo ;
Verellen, Dirk ;
Indovina, Luca .
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 85 :175-191
[10]   A geometry and dose-volume based performance monitoring of artificial intelligence models in radiotherapy treatment planning for prostate cancer [J].
De Kerf, Geert ;
Claessens, Michael ;
Raouassi, Fadoua ;
Mercier, Carole ;
Stas, Daan ;
Ost, Piet ;
Dirix, Piet ;
Verellen, Dirk .
PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2023, 28