STENOTIC CERVICAL SPINAL CORD AND COLUMN RESPONSES UNDER WHIPLASH USING A FINITE ELEMENT MODEL

被引:0
作者
Yoganandan, Narayan [1 ,2 ]
Harinathan, Balaji [1 ,3 ]
Vedantam, Aditya [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Med Coll Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[2] Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Milwaukee, WI 53295 USA
[3] Vellore Inst Technol, Sch Mech Engn, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2023 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION, IMECE2023, VOL 5 | 2023年
关键词
Cervical Spine; Finite Element Model; Impact Loading; Spinal Cord; Stenosis; MRI GRADING SYSTEM; IN-VIVO; CLASSIFICATION; DEGENERATION; BIOMECHANICS; VALIDATION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Numerous finite element models of the cervical spine have been developed to study the biomechanics of the osteoligamentous column such as range of motion and vertebral stress; however, the spinal cord is often ignored. Spine degeneration is often attributed to the ageing process. It may lead to stenotic spines that concern clinicians and patients because of the decreased space in the canal and potential for elevated risk of cord and/or column injuries. Using a validated model of the subaxial spinal column, spinal cord was included, and different degrees of stenosis (mild, moderate, and severe) identified in the civilian populations were parametrized. Stenosis was simulated at the most common, C5-C6 level, seen in patients. The column-cord model was subjected to postero-anterior acceleration at the base of the T1 vertebra. Range of motion, disc pressure, and stress and strain within the spinal cord were obtained at the index and superior and inferior adjacent levels of the column and cord. The external metric representing the segmental range of motion were found to be insensitive while intrinsic disc and cord variables were more sensitive, and index level was more affected by stenosis. These findings may influence surgical planning and patient education in personalized medicine.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Cervical arthroplasty: a critical review of the literature [J].
Alvin, Matthew D. ;
Abbott, E. Emily ;
Lubelski, Daniel ;
Kuhns, Benjamin ;
Nowacki, Amy S. ;
Steinmetz, Michael P. ;
Benzel, Edward C. ;
Mroz, Thomas E. .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2014, 14 (09) :2231-2245
[2]   Relevance of using a compressive preload in the cervical spine: an experimental and numerical simulating investigation [J].
Barrey C. ;
Rousseau M.-A. ;
Persohn S. ;
Campana S. ;
Perrin G. ;
Skalli W. .
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2015, 25 (Suppl 1) :155-165
[3]   Influence of follower load application on moment-rotation parameters and intradiscal pressure in the cervical spine [J].
Bell, Kevin M. ;
Yan, Yiguo ;
Hartman, Robert A. ;
Lee, Joon Y. .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2018, 76 :167-172
[4]  
Bilston LE, 1996, ANN BIOMED ENG, V24, P67, DOI 10.1007/BF02770996
[5]   SPINE UPDATE - AGING AND DEGENERATION OF THE HUMAN INTERVERTEBRAL DISC [J].
BUCKWALTER, JA .
SPINE, 1995, 20 (11) :1307-1314
[6]   Unique biomechanical signatures of Bryan, Prodisc C, and Prestige LP cervical disc replacements: a finite element modelling study [J].
Choi, Hoon ;
Purushothaman, Yuvaraj ;
Baisden, Jamie ;
Yoganandan, Narayan .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2020, 29 (11) :2631-2639
[7]   A Comparative in vivo Study of Semi-constrained and Unconstrained Cervical Artificial Disc Prostheses [J].
Choi, Hoon ;
Baisden, Jamie L. ;
Yoganandan, Narayan .
MILITARY MEDICINE, 2019, 184 (3-4) :637-643
[8]   Biomechanics of the cervical spine 4: major injuries [J].
Cusick, JF ;
Yoganandan, N .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2002, 17 (01) :1-20
[10]   INVIVO FLEXION EXTENSION OF THE NORMAL CERVICAL-SPINE [J].
DVORAK, J ;
PANJABI, MM ;
NOVOTNY, JE ;
ANTINNES, JA .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 1991, 9 (06) :828-834