Risk Assessment of Test Cycle Change of Important Equipment in Nuclear Power Plant

被引:0
|
作者
Yu, Xipeng [1 ,2 ]
Dai, Hongwei [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Suzhou Nucl Power Res Inst Co Ltd, Nucl Safety & Operat Technol Ctr, Suzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Engn Res Ctr ChinaNucl Power Plant Safety &, Suzhou, Peoples R China
来源
2024 6TH ASIA ENERGY AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING SYMPOSIUM, AEEES 2024 | 2024年
关键词
probabilistic safety analysis; hydro test pump diesel generator system; incremental risk; nuclear power plant; test cycle;
D O I
10.1109/AEEES61147.2024.10544950
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Probabilistic safety analysis (PSA) has become the main method in the world to quantitatively calculate the reactor risk increment when the nuclear power plant equipment is not available and to support the nuclear power plant in making risk decisions. When analyzing the periodic test data of the hydro test pump diesel generator system (LLS001AP) in a domestic nuclear power plant, it is found that the number of start-up failures of the hydro test pump diesel generator set is significantly increased compared with the previous one. To cooperate with the maintenance profession to find out the cause of the fault, the nuclear power plant needs to increase the frequency of the periodic test of the hydro test pump diesel generator system. In this paper, probability safety analysis technology is used to analyze and judge whether the frequency of periodic tests of the hydro test pump diesel generator system can be increased. Ensure safe and stable operation of the nuclear reactor after changing the frequency of periodic tests.
引用
收藏
页码:378 / 382
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Qualification Test Standards Research of Electrical Equipment Important to Safety of Nuclear Power Plants
    Guo, Yin-Hui
    Wang, Zhong-Qiu
    Zhang, Yun-Bo
    Feng, Yan
    Qiao, Ning
    Liu, Jing-bin
    NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS: INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES FOR INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL SYSTEMS, 2017, 400 : 153 - 161
  • [2] Formal Probabilistic Risk Assessment of a Nuclear Power Plant
    Abdelghany, Mohamed
    Tahar, Sofiene
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH ACM SIGPLAN INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON FORMAL TECHNIQUES FOR SAFETY-CRITICAL SYSTEMS, FTSCS 2022, 2022, : 80 - 87
  • [3] Research on Life Cycle Management of Nuclear Power Plant equipment based on Economic Analysis
    Gu, Kai-kai
    Guo, Jiang
    Fan, Ming-shu
    Zhang, Ke-fei
    Shi, Lei
    2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (IEEM), 2012, : 418 - 422
  • [4] Results of an Analysis of Field Studies of the Intrinsic Dynamic Characteristics Important for the Safety of Nuclear Power Plant Equipment
    Kaznovsky A.P.
    Kasiyanov K.G.
    Ryasnyj S.I.
    Power Technology and Engineering, 2015, 48 (5) : 375 - 379
  • [5] DETERMINATION OF PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE CYCLE FOR AGEING EQUIPMENT IN NUCLEAR POWER PLANT BASED ON ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
    Shi Jie
    Deng Fan
    Lu Yong-fang
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 21ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUCLEAR ENGINEERING - 2013, VOL 1, 2014,
  • [6] Ensembles of climate change models for risk assessment of nuclear power plants
    Vagnoli, Matteo
    Di Maio, Francesco
    Zio, Enrico
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART O-JOURNAL OF RISK AND RELIABILITY, 2018, 232 (02) : 185 - 200
  • [7] Life Cycle Assessment of the New Generation GT-MHR Nuclear Power Plant
    Koltun, Paul
    Tsykalo, Alfred
    Novozhilov, Vasily
    ENERGIES, 2018, 11 (12)
  • [8] Risk assessment for radioactive contamination of the environment during operation of a nuclear power plant
    I. I. Kryshev
    E. P. Ryazantsev
    Atomic Energy, 1998, 85 : 583 - 588
  • [9] Risk assessment for radioactive contamination of the environment during operation of a nuclear power plant
    Kryshev, II
    Ryazantsev, EP
    ATOMIC ENERGY, 1998, 85 (02) : 583 - 588
  • [10] Risk assessment of nuclear power plants
    R. T. Islamov
    A. A. Derevyankin
    I. V. Zhukov
    M. A. Berberova
    I. V. Glukhov
    D. R. Islamov
    Atomic Energy, 2011, 109 : 375 - 379