Life cycle assessment of the production of an extruded dog food in Brazil

被引:3
作者
Costa, Jessyka L. G. [1 ]
Bankuti, Ferenc I. [1 ]
Oiko, Olivia T. [2 ]
Monti, Mariana [3 ]
Loureiro, Bruna A. [4 ]
Henriquez, Lucas B. F. [1 ]
Florindo, Thiago Jose [5 ]
Vasconcellos, Ricardo S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Maringa, Ctr Agr Sci, Dept Anim Sci, BR-87020900 Maringa, PR, Brazil
[2] Univ Estadual Maringa, Dept Prod Engn, BR-87020900 Maringa, PR, Brazil
[3] Special Dog Co, BR-18900000 Santa Cruz Do Rio Pardo, SP, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Paraiba, Ctr Agr Sci, Dept Anim Sci, BR-58397000 Areia, PB, Brazil
[5] Univ Fed Mato Grosso do Sul, BR-79750000 Nova Andradina, MS, Brazil
关键词
Attributional LCA; Dogs; Dry pet foods; Environmental impacts; LAND-USE CHANGE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; COMPANION DOGS; PET FOOD; SUSTAINABILITY; CONSUMPTION; EMISSIONS; TRENDS; CATS; MEAT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142505
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Sustainability is the current focus of the scientific community, governments, and companies in various market segments, such as pet food. Pet food production has increased rapidly in recent years, with a trend toward the development of environmentally friendly products and processes. The first step in creating strategies for mitigating environmental impacts is to assess key points in manufacturing processes. Given this, this study aimed to perform a life cycle assessment (LCA) to estimate the environmental impacts associated with the formulation, production, and distribution phases of an extruded dog food produced in Brazil. System boundaries were from cradle-to-gate, encompassing extraction of raw materials, transportation, processing, production, packaging, and distribution. Estimates were based on the amount of food required to meet the energy requirements for maintenance of a 10 kg dog (functional unit = 2.59 MJ day- 1, reference flow = 177.3 g day- 1). Environmental impacts were calculated by the environmental footprint method (EF 3.0 v. 1.00) using SimaPro software (v. 9.1.1.1). Product ingredients and packaging materials were modeled under Brazilian conditions using ecoinvent 3.7.1 and Agri-footprint 5.0 databases. Data regarding transportation, processing, distribution, electric and thermal power generation, water usage, and waste generation were obtained from the company's records (2019-2020). In this study, as expected, formulation was the most relevant factor, accounting for 70%-90% of the total environmental impacts. The main impact categories were terrestrial and marine eutrophication, acidification, particulate matter, and climate change (80% of total impacts). Production of the evaluated dog food was associated with the emission of 88.73 kg CO2 eq year- 1 or 1.37 kg CO2 eq kg- 1 distributed food. The use of animal meals (poultry by-product meal and meat and bone meal) and vegetable by-products (wheat bran and rice bran) contributed to reducing environmental impacts. Therefore, in this study, ingredient selection was considered the most important factor in mitigating the environmental impacts of pet foods. As the overall impact of the formulation depends on data on the use stage, such as nutrient excretion after consumption, future studies should adopt a cradle-to-grave approach for a better comprehension of the feasibility of applying animal and vegetable by-products in the eco-design of pet food products.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 60 条
[11]  
Beck T., 2010, LANCA Land Use Indicator Value Calculation in Life Cycle Assessment
[12]   Air pollution epidemiology: A simplified Generalized Linear Model approach optimized by bio-inspired metaheuristics [J].
Belotti, Jonatas T. ;
Castanho, Diego S. ;
Araujo, Lilian N. ;
da Silva, Lucas, V ;
Alves, Thiago Antonini ;
Tadano, Yara S. ;
Stevan Jr, Sergio L. ;
Correa, Fernanda C. ;
Siqueira, Hugo, V .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2020, 191
[13]  
Brito T., 2021, BIOL LIFE SCI FORUM, V3, P11, DOI [10.3390/IECAG2021-10072, DOI 10.3390/IECAG2021-10072, 10.3390/IECAG2021, DOI 10.3390/IECAG2021]
[14]   Life-cycle assessment of animal feed ingredients: Poultry fat, poultry by-product meal and hydrolyzed feather meal [J].
Campos, Ines ;
Pinheiro Valente, Luisa Maria ;
Matos, Elisabete ;
Marques, Pedro ;
Freire, Fausto .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 252
[15]   Environmental life cycle assessment of cow milk in a conventional semi-intensive Brazilian production system [J].
Carvalho, Laurine Santos ;
Willers, Camila Daniele ;
Soares, Bruna Borges ;
Nogueira, Alex Rodrigues ;
de Almeida Neto, Jose Adolfo ;
Rodrigues, Luciano Brito .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (15) :21259-21274
[16]   Greenhouse gas assessment of soybean production: implications of land use change and different cultivation systems [J].
Castanheira, Erica Geraldes ;
Freire, Fausto .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2013, 54 :49-60
[17]   Environmental impact of rabbit meat: The effect of production efficiency [J].
Cesari, V ;
Zucali, M. ;
Bava, L. ;
Gislon, G. ;
Tamburini, A. ;
Toschi, I .
MEAT SCIENCE, 2018, 145 :447-454
[18]   Environmental impact assessment of an Italian vertically integrated broiler system through a Life Cycle approach [J].
Cesari, V. ;
Zucali, M. ;
Sandrucci, A. ;
Tamburini, A. ;
Bava, L. ;
Toschi, I. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 143 :904-911
[19]  
Cohen AJ, 2017, LANCET, V389, P1907, DOI [10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30505-6, 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)30505-6]
[20]   Global environmental impacts: data sources and methodological choices for calculating normalization factors for LCA [J].
Crenna, Eleonora ;
Secchi, Michela ;
Benini, Lorenzo ;
Sala, Serenella .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2019, 24 (10) :1851-1877