Risk-Based Decision-Making Framework for Implementation of Collaboration and Integration Strategies

被引:1
|
作者
Kim, Suryeon [1 ]
Ghimire, Prashnna [2 ]
Barutha, Philip [3 ]
Jeong, H. David [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Construct Sci, College Stn, TX 77840 USA
[2] Univ Nebraska, Durham Sch Architectural Engn & Construct, Lincoln, NE 68583 USA
[3] Univ Notre Dame, Civil & Environm Engn, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
关键词
Collaboration and integration strategies; Risk-based decision-making; Elimination and choice translating reality III (ELECTRE III); ELECTRE III METHOD; PROJECT DELIVERY; SUPPLIER SELECTION; PERFORMANCE; DESIGN; SYSTEM; MANAGEMENT; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5719
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
As construction projects have become larger and more complex, collaboration between project participants and the integration of work processes have become essential elements in delivering a successful project. Collaboration and integration strategies serve as vehicles to enhance these aspects and are known to significantly improve project outcomes. However, limited organizational resources may make it challenging to employ all these strategies on a single project. A project team needs proper guidance in selecting the most appropriate strategies to maximize its return on investment. Previous research has primarily focused on measuring and estimating the effectiveness and efficiency of these strategies rather than on providing a systematic approach for selecting them before a project begins. Given that these strategies often involve significant behavioral changes and financial investments, the implementation of a systematic decision-making framework is imperative. In this study, we developed a decision-making framework that enables project participants to systematically identify the most suitable collaboration and integration strategies based on the specific risks associated with a construction project. A multicriteria decision-making technique based on the elimination and choice translating reality III (ELECTRE III) algorithm was applied in this research, and industry-wide questionnaire survey responses provided input to the model. In this study, we used three hypothetical scenarios to demonstrate the decision-making process and validated the framework with two case study projects. The proposed risk-based decision-making framework aligned with actual practices and turned out to be reliable and effective. The findings of this study are expected to aid project stakeholders and participants in selecting optimal combinations of collaboration and integration strategies that can provide maximum value to projects. The proposed framework will enhance project participants' decision-making capabilities by providing a systematic approach that takes multiple project risks into account simultaneously and maximizes decision flexibility. Collaboration among project participants and the integration of work processes are essential for improving project outcomes in the construction industry. A range of strategies is available for promoting collaboration and integration, enhancing project value and performance. The selection of the most suitable strategies is crucial, considering limited organizational resources that must be allocated wisely in order to maintain competitiveness. In this study, we identified 22 collaboration and integration strategies and proposed a risk-based decision-making framework for the selection of the optimal strategies. Project participants can systematically prioritize these strategies based on a project's risk profile, which is established in the early stages of a project. This framework offers flexibility in decision-making and allows for hierarchical prioritization. It serves as a valuable tool for project participants who may lack experience with or knowledge of collaboration and integration strategies, facilitating well-informed decisions that take project-specific risks into account. Furthermore, the framework provides insights into bundling strategies, which can reduce redundancy and minimize organizational investment. These benefits contribute to a more streamlined decision-making process.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk-based decision-making framework for the selection of sediment dredging option
    Manap, Norpadzlihatun
    Voulvoulis, Nikolaos
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 496 : 607 - 623
  • [2] The RMP as a tool for risk-based decision-making
    Mattheissen, C
    Helsing, L
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE AND WORKSHOP ON RISK ANALYSIS IN PROCESS SAFETY, 1997, : 341 - 347
  • [3] A novel risk-based decision-making paradigm
    Morgado, Pedro
    Marques, Fernanda
    Silva, Miguel B.
    Sousa, Nuno
    Cerqueira, Joao J.
    FRONTIERS IN BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 8
  • [4] An applied complex systems framework for risk-based decision-making in infrastructure engineering
    Gomez, C.
    Sanchez-Silva, M.
    Duenas-Osorio, L.
    STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2014, 50 : 66 - 77
  • [5] More Regulators Rely on Risk-Based Decision-Making
    Prabhakaran, Vidhya
    POWER, 2016, 160 (11) : 20 - 20
  • [6] RISK-BASED DECISION-MAKING BY MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE TEACHERS
    Pratt, Dave
    Levinson, Ralph
    Kent, Phillip
    Yogui, Cristina
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SEVENTH CONGRESS OF THE EUROPEAN SOCIETY FOR RESEARCH IN MATHEMATICS EDUCATION (CERME 7), 2011, : 875 - 884
  • [7] GROUP OFFERS RISK-BASED DECISION-MAKING REFORMS
    EMBER, L
    CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 1993, 71 (29) : 30 - 31
  • [8] Money laundering regulation and risk-based decision-making
    Ross, Stuart
    Hannan, Michelle
    JOURNAL OF MONEY LAUNDERING CONTROL, 2007, 10 (01): : 106 - +
  • [9] Framework Methodology for Risk-Based Decision Making for Transportation Agencies
    Lin, Yolanda C.
    Paul, Abhishek
    Corotis, Ross B.
    Liel, Abbie B.
    ASCE-ASME JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY IN ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PART A-CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2015, 1 (03):
  • [10] Incorporating weather forecasts into risk-based irrigation decision-making
    Muller, C. F.
    Neal, M. B.
    Carey-Smith, T. K.
    Luttrell, J.
    Srinivasan, M. S.
    AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES, 2021, 25 (02): : 159 - 172