Second-order citations in altmetrics: A case study analyzing the audiences of COVID-19 research in the news and on social media

被引:1
作者
Alperin, Juan Pablo [1 ,2 ]
Fleerackers, Alice [2 ,3 ]
Riedlinger, Michelle [2 ,4 ]
Haustein, Stefanie [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Simon Fraser Univ, Sch Publishing, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[2] Simon Fraser Univ, Scholarly Commun Lab, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[3] Univ British Columbia, Sch Journalism Writing & Media, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[4] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Commun, Brisbane, Australia
[5] Univ Ottawa, Sch Informat Studies, Ottawa, ON, Canada
来源
QUANTITATIVE SCIENCE STUDIES | 2024年 / 5卷 / 02期
关键词
altmetrics; COVID-19; journalism; news; social media; societal impact; SCIENCE; IMPACT; JOURNALISM; SELECTION; ARTICLES; METRICS; TWEETS;
D O I
10.1162/qss_a_00298
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
The potential to capture the societal impact of research has been a driving motivation for the use and development of altmetrics. Yet, to date, altmetrics have largely failed to deliver on this potential because the primary audience that cites research on social media has been shown to be academics themselves. In response, our study investigates an extension of traditional altmetric approaches that goes beyond capturing direct mentions of research on social media. Using research articles from the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic as a case study, we demonstrate the value of measuring "second-order citations," or social media mentions of news coverage of research. We find that a sample of these citations, published by just five media outlets, were shared and engaged with on social media twice as much as the research articles themselves. Moreover, first-order and second-order citations circulated among Twitter accounts and Facebook accounts that were largely distinct from each other. The differences in audiences and engagement patterns found in this case study provide strong evidence that investigating these second-order citations can be an effective way of observing overlooked audiences who engage with research content on social media.
引用
收藏
页码:366 / 382
页数:17
相关论文
共 72 条
  • [1] Alperin Juan Pablo, 2023, Zenodo, DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.7803153
  • [2] Alperin Juan Pablo, 2023, HarvardDataverse, V1, DOI 10.7910/DVN/OEKB01
  • [3] Identifying diffusion patterns of research articles on Twitter: A case study of online engagement with open access articles
    Alperin, Juan Pablo
    Gomez, Charles J.
    Haustein, Stefanie
    [J]. PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2019, 28 (01) : 2 - 18
  • [4] Altmetric, 2023, Text mining
  • [5] Badenschier F, 2012, SOCIOL SCI YEARB, V28, P59, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-2085-5_4
  • [6] Bornmann L, 2016, THEORIES OF INFORMETRICS AND SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION: A FESTSCHRIFT IN HONOR OF BLAISE CRONIN, P347
  • [7] Bruns, 2018, GATEWATCHING NEWS CU, DOI DOI 10.3726/B13293
  • [8] 'Corona? 5G? or both?': the dynamics of COVID-19/5G conspiracy theories on Facebook
    Bruns, Axel
    Harrington, Stephen
    Hurcombe, Edward
    [J]. MEDIA INTERNATIONAL AUSTRALIA, 2020, 177 (01) : 12 - 29
  • [9] Burgess J, 2022, Twitter: A Biography
  • [10] Quantifying and contextualizing the impact of bioRxiv preprints through automated social media audience segmentation
    Carlson, Jedidiah
    Harris, Kelley
    [J]. PLOS BIOLOGY, 2020, 18 (09)