Employment Skills Revisited: A Qualitative Exploration of Multi-Stakeholder Perspective in China's "3+1" Higher Education Context

被引:2
作者
Wang, Wanyu [1 ,2 ]
Hussin, Muhammad [1 ]
Abd Majid, Mohamad Zuber [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kebangssan Malaysia, Bangi, Malaysia
[2] Baicheng Normal Univ, Baicheng, Peoples R China
关键词
Employment skills; higher education; 3+1" programs; stakeholders; China;
D O I
10.21659/rupkatha.v16n2.14g
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The issue of employment for university students is receiving significant attention in China, leading to educational reforms aimed at enhancing students' employment skills and prospects. One such initiative is the "3+1" higher education programs, characterized by work-based learning. However, the effectiveness of this initiative falls short of expectations due to insufficient understanding of the up-to-date employment skills required by the industry. As such, this qualitative study explored stakeholders' perceptions regarding the employment skills needed by students enrolled in "3+1" programs. Key challenges and strategies associated with developing students ' employment skills were identified through interviews with students, teachers, curriculum planners, industry leaders, and human resource professionals. Findings revealed a consensus among stakeholders on the importance of developing a holistic skill set, acquiring practical experience, increasing adaptability and resilience, embracing lifelong learning, and improving communication skills. Challenges included mismatches between academic learning and industry demands, limited industry exposure, soft skill deficiency, inadequate assessment, insufficient university-industry cooperation, and students' low motivation, for which corresponding strategies were proposed. This study provides valuable insights into enhancing the employability of "3+1" graduates, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive education aligned with industry needs.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Cai D., 2019, Modern Education Forum, V2, P46, DOI [10.32629/mef.v2i5.114, DOI 10.32629/MEF.V2I5.114]
[2]  
Cai Y., 2020, P 2020 C ED SCI ED S, P19, DOI [10.38007/Proceedings.0000552, DOI 10.38007/PROCEEDINGS.0000552]
[3]  
Cao Y., 2018, Advances in Social Sciences, V7, P81, DOI [10.12677/ass.2018.71014, DOI 10.12677/ASS.2018.71014]
[4]  
Chen K., 2022, Advances in Education, V12, P3124, DOI [10.12677/ae.2022.128478, DOI 10.12677/AE.2022.128478]
[5]  
Chen L., 2020, Education Research, P47, DOI [10.32629/er.v3i3.2565, DOI 10.32629/ER.V3I3.2565]
[6]  
Chen S., 2020, Scientific Development of Education, V2, DOI [10.36012/sde.v2i11.2419, DOI 10.36012/SDE.V2I11.2419]
[7]  
Crisp G., 2019, Education for employability, V1
[8]  
Dong D., 2021, Creative Education Studies, V9, P1580, DOI [10.12677/ces.2021.96262, DOI 10.12677/CES.2021.96262]
[9]  
Even A. M., 2024, Advancing student employability through higher education
[10]  
Hennink M., 2020, Qualitative research methods