Transaction Costs in Public-Private Partnerships: The Weight of Institutional Quality in Developing Countries Revisited

被引:22
作者
Baker, Nicole Ballouz [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ St Joseph Beyrouth, Campus Sci Sociales,BP 17-5208, Beirut 11042020, Lebanon
关键词
judicial independence; public-private partnerships; regulatory quality; transaction costs; uncertainty; PERFORMANCE; ECONOMICS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1080/15309576.2016.1244092
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
Unlike the case of private hybrid organizational structures, the institutional dimension in a public-private partnership (PPP) is no longer exogenous to the decisions of the partners in a transaction. The public partner, in this type of contract, acts also as regulator and arbitrator when the regulatory bodies and the courts are subject to government influence. This article explores the impact of institutional quality on the expansion of PPP markets in developing countries. The analysis expands on Crocker and Masten's construct for choosing an appropriate organizational structure for the provision of public services. Institutional quality becomes a source of transaction costs on a par with asset specificity and uncertainty, on one hand, and, on the other, it affects the magnitude of the impact of an exogenous unforeseen event. Panel regressions, on a sample of 83 developing countries for the period 1999-2011, provide evidence on the positive impact of judicial independence and regulatory quality in attracting private investors to PPP markets regardless of the degree of uncertainty in the exchange environment.
引用
收藏
页码:431 / 455
页数:25
相关论文
共 49 条
[11]  
Burger P., 2011, OECD Journal on Budgeting, V2011, P1
[12]   The impact of empirical tests of transaction cost economics on the debate on the nature of the firm [J].
Carter, R ;
Hodgson, GM .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2006, 27 (05) :461-476
[13]   Regulation and administered contracts revisited: Lessons from transaction-cost economics for public utility regulation [J].
Crocker, KJ ;
Masten, SE .
JOURNAL OF REGULATORY ECONOMICS, 1996, 9 (01) :5-39
[14]   A systematic assessment of the empirical support for transaction cost economics [J].
David, RJ ;
Han, SK .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2004, 25 (01) :39-58
[15]  
Delmon J., 2010, Understanding options for public-private partnerships in infrastructure-Sorting out the forest from the trees: BOT, DBFO, DCMF, concession, lease, DOI DOI 10.1596/1813-9450-5173
[16]  
Diamond M. J., 2005, 550 IMF
[17]  
DUMEZ H, 2003, POLITIQUES MANAGEMEN, V21, P1, DOI DOI 10.3406/POMAP.2003.2819
[18]  
Engel Eduardo, 2011, PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTN
[19]  
Estache A., 2010, 82010 EIB EC DEP
[20]   PPI partnerships vs. PPI divorces in LDCs [J].
Estache, Antonio .
REVIEW OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2006, 29 (1-2) :3-26