Multi-objective optimization application for a coupled light water small modular reactor-combined heat and power cycle (cogeneration) systems

被引:0
作者
Kang, Seong Woo [1 ]
Yim, Man-Sung [2 ]
机构
[1] Korea Atom Energy Res Inst KAERI, Risk Assessment Res Div, Daejeon, South Korea
[2] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol KAIST, Dept Nucl & Quantum Engn, Daejeon, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Combined heat and power; Cogeneration; SMR; Multi-objective optimization; Design optimization; LCOE; ENERGY; INVESTMENT; HYDROGEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.net.2023.12.019
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
The goal of this research is to propose a way to maximize small modular reactor (SMR) utilization to gain better market feasibility in support of carbon neutrality. For that purpose, a comprehensive tool was developed, combining off-design thermohydraulic models, economic objective models (levelized cost of electricity, annual profit), non-economic models (saved CO2), a parameter input sampling method (Latin hypercube sampling, LHS), and a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (Non-dominated Sorting Algorithm-2, NSGA2 method) for optimizing a SMR-combined heat and power cycle (CHP) system design. Considering multiple objectives, it was shown that NSGA2+LHS method can find better optimal solution sets with similar computational costs compared to a conventional weighted sum (WS) method. Out of multiple multi-objective optimal design configurations for a 105 MWe design generation rating, a chosen reference SMR-CHP system resulted in its levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) below $60/MWh for various heat prices, showing economic competitiveness for energy market conditions similar to South Korea. Examined economic feasibility may vary significantly based on CHP heat prices, and extensive consideration of the regional heat market may be required for SMR-CHP regional optimization. Nonetheless, with reasonable heat market prices (e.g. district heating prices comparable to those in Europe and Korea), SMR can still become highly competitive in the energy market if coupled with a CHP system.
引用
收藏
页码:1654 / 1666
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Techno-economic assessment and optimization of a hybrid renewable co-supply of electricity, heat and hydrogen system to enhance performance by recovering excess electricity for a large energy consumer [J].
Akhtari, Mohammad Reza ;
Baneshi, Mehdi .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 188 :131-141
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Combined Heat and Power
[3]  
evaluating the benefits of a global greater investment
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Projected Costs of Generating Electricity (tech. rep. January)
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2017, IAEA NUCL ENERGY SER
[6]  
Blank L., 2005, ENG ECON, V6th
[7]   Reimagining future energy systems: Overview of the US program to maximize energy utilization via integrated nuclear-renewable energy systems [J].
Bragg-Sitton, Shannon M. ;
Boardman, Richard ;
Rabiti, Cristian ;
O'Brien, James .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2020, 44 (10) :8156-8169
[8]  
Breeze P., 2018, Combined heat and power
[9]  
Caramia M., 2008, MULTIOBJECTIVE MANAG, P11, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-84800-382-8
[10]  
Cherif H., 2018, Sustainable Desalination Handbook, P527, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-12-809240-8.00015-0, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-809240-8.00015-0]