The effect of moral framing on attitudes towards offshore wind farms in Turkey

被引:1
作者
Goral, Elif [1 ,3 ]
Hannum, Christopher M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Marmara Univ, Fac Econ, Dept Publ Finance, TR-34722 Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Univ Cent Asia, Dept Global Econ, Khorog 736000, Gbao, Tajikistan
[3] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Econ, Dept Appl Econ, NL-3062 PA Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Renewable energy; Moral framing; Public discourse; Public acceptance; Political ideology; Offshore wind farms; RENEWABLE ENERGY; COLLEGE-STUDENTS; POLITICAL-IDEOLOGY; PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS; CLIMATE; ACCEPTANCE; RESPONSES; INSIGHTS; POWER;
D O I
10.1016/j.socec.2024.102189
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Public support of renewable energy has become more important as the share of renewable energy increases recently. To avoid public opposition framing strategies can be used. In this study, we aim to reveal the effect of moral framing on support for an intended offshore wind farm (OWF) project in Turkey. We designed a survey with two framing conditions in line with the assertions of Moral Foundations Theory, individualizing and binding, and one control condition. The individualizing condition appeals to the values associated with fairness and well-being. The binding condition appeals to values associated with patriotism, purity and respect for authority, and a control condition lacking any such targeting. We found, prioritizing economic growth, positive expectations from OWFs and willingness to bear personal cost to solve environmental problems positively affect support for OWF, while visual concerns and concerns regarding environment and limited natural resources negatively affect support for OWF. Regarding the framing effect, we found that congruency between political ideology and framing conditions is only significant for individualizing condition. Left-leaning individuals who were exposed to individualizing condition are more likely to support OWFs compared to those of who were exposed to binding and control condition.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 68 条
[11]   The Moral Roots of Environmental Attitudes [J].
Feinberg, Matthew ;
Willer, Robb .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2013, 24 (01) :56-62
[12]   Uncharted waters: Exploring coastal recreation impacts, coping behaviors, and attitudes towards offshore wind energy development in the United States [J].
Ferguson, Michael D. ;
Evensen, Darrick ;
Ferguson, Lauren A. ;
Bidwell, David ;
Firestone, Jeremy ;
Dooley, Tasha L. ;
Mitchell, Clayton R. .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2021, 75
[13]   System Justification, the Denial of Global Warming, and the Possibility of "System-Sanctioned Change" [J].
Feygina, Irina ;
Jost, John T. ;
Goldsmith, Rachel E. .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2010, 36 (03) :326-338
[14]   Public opinion about large offshore wind power: Underlying factors [J].
Firestone, Jeremy ;
Kempton, Willett .
ENERGY POLICY, 2007, 35 (03) :1584-1598
[15]   Mapping the Moral Domain [J].
Graham, Jesse ;
Nosek, Brian A. ;
Haidt, Jonathan ;
Iyer, Ravi ;
Koleva, Spassena ;
Ditto, Peter H. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 101 (02) :366-385
[16]   Liberals and Conservatives Rely on Different Sets of Moral Foundations [J].
Graham, Jesse ;
Haidt, Jonathan ;
Nosek, Brian A. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 96 (05) :1029-1046
[17]   Public perceptions of wind energy developments: Case studies from New Zealand [J].
Graham, Jessica B. ;
Stephenson, Janet R. ;
Smith, Inga J. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (09) :3348-3357
[18]   Political ideology affects energy-efficiency attitudes and choices [J].
Gromet, Dena M. ;
Kunreuther, Howard ;
Larrick, Richard P. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2013, 110 (23) :9314-9319
[19]   Understanding public responses to offshore wind power [J].
Haggett, Claire .
ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (02) :503-510
[20]   Ideology as Filter: Motivated Information Processing and Decision-Making in the Energy Domain [J].
Hahnel, Ulf J. J. ;
Mumenthaler, Christian ;
Spampatti, Tobia ;
Brosch, Tobias .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (20) :1-19