The effect of moral framing on attitudes towards offshore wind farms in Turkey

被引:1
作者
Goral, Elif [1 ,3 ]
Hannum, Christopher M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Marmara Univ, Fac Econ, Dept Publ Finance, TR-34722 Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Univ Cent Asia, Dept Global Econ, Khorog 736000, Gbao, Tajikistan
[3] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Econ, Dept Appl Econ, NL-3062 PA Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Renewable energy; Moral framing; Public discourse; Public acceptance; Political ideology; Offshore wind farms; RENEWABLE ENERGY; COLLEGE-STUDENTS; POLITICAL-IDEOLOGY; PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS; CLIMATE; ACCEPTANCE; RESPONSES; INSIGHTS; POWER;
D O I
10.1016/j.socec.2024.102189
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Public support of renewable energy has become more important as the share of renewable energy increases recently. To avoid public opposition framing strategies can be used. In this study, we aim to reveal the effect of moral framing on support for an intended offshore wind farm (OWF) project in Turkey. We designed a survey with two framing conditions in line with the assertions of Moral Foundations Theory, individualizing and binding, and one control condition. The individualizing condition appeals to the values associated with fairness and well-being. The binding condition appeals to values associated with patriotism, purity and respect for authority, and a control condition lacking any such targeting. We found, prioritizing economic growth, positive expectations from OWFs and willingness to bear personal cost to solve environmental problems positively affect support for OWF, while visual concerns and concerns regarding environment and limited natural resources negatively affect support for OWF. Regarding the framing effect, we found that congruency between political ideology and framing conditions is only significant for individualizing condition. Left-leaning individuals who were exposed to individualizing condition are more likely to support OWFs compared to those of who were exposed to binding and control condition.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   Guilt and Shame: Environmental Message Framing Effects [J].
Baek, Tae Hyun ;
Yoon, Sukki .
JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING, 2017, 46 (03) :440-453
[2]   Are college students really liberal? An exploration of student political ideology and attitudes toward policies impacting minorities [J].
Bailey, Mandi ;
Williams, Lee R. .
SOCIAL SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2016, 53 (03) :309-317
[3]   Green Priorities: How economic frames affect perceptions of renewable energy in the United States [J].
Bayulgen, Oksan ;
Benegal, Salil .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2019, 47 :28-36
[4]   Public acceptance and preferences related to renewable energy and grid expansion policy: Empirical insights for Germany [J].
Bertsch, Valentin ;
Hall, Margeret ;
Weinhardt, Christof ;
Fichtner, Wolf .
ENERGY, 2016, 114 :465-477
[5]   Anglers? support for an offshore wind farm: Fishing effects or clean energy symbolism [J].
Bidwell, David ;
Smythe, Tiffany ;
Tyler, Grant .
MARINE POLICY, 2023, 151
[6]  
Bora T., 2021, Turk saginin Uc hali: Milliyetcilik, muhafazakarlik, V3rd
[7]   Public perceptions of and responses to new energy technologies [J].
Boudet, Hilary S. .
NATURE ENERGY, 2019, 4 (06) :446-455
[8]  
DeVellis R.F., 2003, Scale development: theory and applications, V2nd
[9]  
Dunlap RileyE., 1975, Environment and Behavior, V7, P428, DOI DOI 10.1177/001391657500700402
[10]  
Egilmez M., Sag, Sol,Kapitalizm, sosyalizm, demokrasi ve egitim