Chinese public's perceptions and understanding of the potential roles of solar climate engineering for reducing climate change risks

被引:1
作者
Zhang, Zhihua [1 ,3 ]
Huisingh, Donald [2 ]
Crabbe, M. James C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ, Sch Math, Climate Modeling Lab, Jinan, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Tennessee, Inst Secure & Sustainable Environm, Knoxville, TN USA
[3] Univ Oxford, Wolfson Coll, Oxford, England
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Climate change; Public perception; Solar climate engineering; China; TECHNOLOGIES;
D O I
10.1007/s10668-024-05054-x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Limiting global temperature increases appear to be an exceedingly challenging task due to great difficulty in advancing carbon reduction emission negotiation. Solar climate engineering is emerging as an emergency shield for climate risks. Except for its technical feasibility and reasonable costs, public understanding is essential for future implementation. Compared with wide studies in Europe and North America, our study was the first large-scale survey to comprehensively investigate the Chinese public's attitude toward solar climate engineering. Moreover, our study was the first to focus on combined solar climate engineering schemes and investigate Public attitude toward international governance and regulatory structures. Our survey revealed that: The surveyed Chinese participants perceived a high level of its deployment costs and a middle level of its effectiveness, technical readiness and side effects. A majority of surveyed participants supported China's active role in international governance and regulatory structures for solar climate engineering. About a half of the surveyed participants were willing to pay taxes to support related research and possible future deployment. However, when solar climate engineering was compared with seven mainstream climate change mitigation schemes, Chinese participants favored less priority and less funding for solar climate engineering. This means that Chinese participants viewed it as only a backup option in climate strategies.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 27 条
[11]  
Edelman Trust, 2020, Edelman Trust Barometer
[12]   Geoengineering, moral hazard, and trust in climate science: evidence from a survey experiment in Britain [J].
Fairbrother, Malcolm .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2016, 139 (3-4) :477-489
[13]   Psychological factors influencing sustainable energy technology acceptance: A review-based comprehensive framework [J].
Huijts, N. M. A. ;
Molin, E. J. E. ;
Steg, L. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2012, 16 (01) :525-531
[14]   Recent advances in carbon emissions reduction: policies, technologies, monitoring, assessment and modeling [J].
Huisingh, Donald ;
Zhang, Zhihua ;
Moore, John C. ;
Qiao, Qi ;
Li, Qi .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 103 :1-12
[15]   Up-to-date life cycle assessment and comparison study of clean coal power generation technologies in China [J].
Liang, Xiaoye ;
Wang, Zhihua ;
Zhou, Zhijun ;
Huang, Zhenyu ;
Zhou, Junhu ;
Cen, Kefa .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2013, 39 :24-31
[16]   Carbon pricing for low carbon technology diffusion: A survey analysis of China's cement industry [J].
Liu, Xianbing ;
Fan, Yongbin ;
Li, Chen .
ENERGY, 2016, 106 :73-86
[17]   The relationship between climate change concern and national wealth [J].
Lo, Alex Y. ;
Chow, Alex T. .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2015, 131 (02) :335-348
[18]   Public understanding of solar radiation management [J].
Mercer, A. M. ;
Keith, D. W. ;
Sharp, J. D. .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2011, 6 (04)
[19]  
Ouyang Y., 2022, Large countries development path: Experience and theory, DOI [10.1007/978-981-16-5695-8, DOI 10.1007/978-981-16-5695-8]
[20]   Deliberating stratospheric aerosols for climate geoengineering and the SPICE project [J].
Pidgeon, Nick ;
Parkhill, Karen ;
Corner, Adam ;
Vaughan, Naomi .
NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2013, 3 (05) :451-457