Partisan Poll Watchers and Americans' Perceptions of Electoral Fairness

被引:0
作者
Cohen, Mollie J. [1 ]
Sheagley, Geoffrey [2 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Dept Polit Sci, 100 N Univ St, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Dept Polit Sci, Athens, GA USA
关键词
VOTER CONFIDENCE; DEMOCRACY; FRAUD; SATISFACTION; POLARIZATION; OBSERVERS; US;
D O I
10.1093/poq/nfae024
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Poll watchers play an increasingly visible role in American elections, yet there is little research into how their presence shapes beliefs about electoral integrity. On the one hand, poll watchers-like other election observers-may lead voters to be more trusting in elections. On the other hand, poll watchers who expressly represent political parties may contribute to polarized views of electoral integrity. We address this gap with two conjoint experiments and one vignette experiment administered on large national samples. The conjoint experiments vary several features of election polling locations, including the presence of poll watchers, voter identification requirements, and other election regulations. We find that regulations around poll watchers shape views of election fairness, but that the nature of this influence depends on the type and partisanship of poll watchers who are present. The vignette experiment shows that perceptions of poll watchers decline when these individuals act in bad faith; effects are especially large for Republican respondents. These findings help identify the potential that poll watchers have to shape Americans' beliefs about election fairness and integrity.
引用
收藏
页码:536 / 560
页数:25
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   What Do We Learn about Voter Preferences from Conjoint Experiments? [J].
Abramson, Scott F. ;
Kocak, Korhan ;
Magazinnik, Asya .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 66 (04) :1008-1020
[2]  
Alexa Corse, 2022, WALL STREET J
[3]   Fraud, convenience, and e-voting: how voting experience shapes opinions about voting technology [J].
Alvarez, R. Michael ;
Levin, Ines ;
Li, Yimeng .
JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & POLITICS, 2018, 15 (02) :94-105
[4]  
Anderson ChristopherJ., 2005, Losers' Consent: Elections and Democratic Legitimacy
[5]   The perils of cherry picking low frequency events in large sample surveys [J].
Ansolabehere, Stephen ;
Luks, Samantha ;
Schaffner, Brian F. .
ELECTORAL STUDIES, 2015, 40 :409-410
[6]   Partisan Poll Watchers and Electoral Manipulation [J].
Ascencio, Sergio J. ;
Rueda, Miguel R. .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2019, 113 (03) :727-742
[7]   The effect of election administration on voter confidence: A local matter? [J].
Atkeson, Lonna Rae ;
Saunders, Kyle L. .
PS-POLITICAL SCIENCE & POLITICS, 2007, 40 (04) :655-660
[8]   Negative and Positive Partisanship in the 2016 US Presidential Elections [J].
Bankert, Alexa .
POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, 2021, 43 (04) :1467-1485
[9]   From voter ID to party ID: How political parties affect perceptions of election fraud in the U.S. [J].
Beaulieu, Emily .
ELECTORAL STUDIES, 2014, 35 :24-32
[10]   The Influence of Partisan Motivated Reasoning on Public Opinion [J].
Bolsen, Toby ;
Druckman, James N. ;
Cook, Fay Lomax .
POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, 2014, 36 (02) :235-262