Why Is the Lack of Support for Women's Rights Appealing? Considering the Roles of Dispositional System-Justifying Motives and Ambivalent Sexism

被引:2
作者
Ozdemir, Fatih
Tayyar, Merve
Topuz, Omer
机构
[1] Department of Psychology, Bursa Uludag University, Bursa
[2] Department of Psychology, Adana Alparslan Turkes Science and Technology University
[3] Department of Psychology, Abdullah Gul University
关键词
women's rights; the Istanbul Convention; dispositional system-justifying motives; ambivalent sexism; AFFIRMATIVE-ACTION; GENDER DIFFERENCES; BENEVOLENT SEXISM; FIT INDEXES; JUSTIFICATION; ATTITUDES; NEED; BELIEFS; COGNITION; CONSERVATISM;
D O I
10.1037/pac0000736
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Although the women's rights movement has made various gains in recent years, there are many negative attitudes toward women and their rights in Turkey. This study aimed to examine the relationship between dispositional system-justifying motives and tendency to support women's rights and to test the mediating role of sexist attitudes in this relationship. A total of 530 Turkish adults participated in the online study, with a mean age of 26.20 years (SD = 5.56). The results show that people with high system justification motivation (including dispositional system-justifying motives, high death anxiety, low need for cognition, and high need for recognition) indicated stronger ambivalent sexism toward women (including hostile and benevolent sexist attitudes). In turn, people with ambivalent sexist attitudes had less willingness to support women's rights (considering attitudes toward women's disadvantaged position in society and awareness and support for the Istanbul Convention).
引用
收藏
页码:507 / 517
页数:11
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]  
Aktan S., 2020, EURONEWS
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2021, LEGAL GAZETTE
[3]  
Aslan Y., 2016, TRKIYEDE FEMINIZM DN
[4]  
Ayhan T, 2017, Marmara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilimler Dergisi, V5, P137, DOI 10.14782/sbd.2017.52
[5]  
Bal IB, 2016, Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, V19, P126
[6]   Environmental attitudes mediate the link between need for cognition and pro-environmental goal choice [J].
Barbaro, Nicole ;
Pickett, Scott M. ;
Parkhill, Michele R. .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2015, 75 :220-223
[7]  
BENTLER PM, 1990, PSYCHOL BULL, V107, P238, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
[8]  
Browne M W., 1993, Testing Structural Equation Models, P136, DOI DOI 10.1177/0049124192021002005
[9]   THE NEED FOR COGNITION [J].
CACIOPPO, JT ;
PETTY, RE .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1982, 42 (01) :116-131
[10]   Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition [J].
Cacioppo, JT ;
Petty, RE ;
Feinstein, JA ;
Blair, W ;
Jarvis, G .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1996, 119 (02) :197-253