How do global commodities react to increasing geopolitical risks? New insights into the Russia-Ukraine and Palestine-Israel conflicts

被引:4
作者
Khan, Nasir [1 ]
Mejri, Sami [2 ]
Hammoudeh, Shawkat [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cent Punjab, UCP Business Sch, Lahore, Pakistan
[2] Manar Univ, Fac Management & Econ, Tunis, Tunisia
[3] Drexel Univ, Lebow Coll Business, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
Russia-Ukraine war; Palestine-Israel conflict; Global commodities; Quantile VAR; Quantile on quantile regression; Causality approach; CRUDE-OIL; VOLATILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107812
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The present study examines the impact of geopolitical risk on global commodities returns by including both major conflicts spanning from January 3, 2023 to December 18, 2023 to cover both the Russia-Ukraine and Palestine-Israel wars. Our study utilizes the QVAR model, the Quantile-on-Quantile regression (QQR) and the frequency causality test. Surprisingly, during the pre-conflict period, our findings reveal a weak positive influence of GPR on commodities, indicating their resilience to extreme negative shocks. Variance decompositions further highlight the limited role of GPR in explaining the commodity price variance. The spillover analysis highlights a low interconnectedness between GPR and commodities, demonstrating a high hedging effectiveness against expected negative GPR shocks. The heterogeneous reaction of commodities to extremely positive GPR shocks suggests diverse responses, emphasizing the need for nuanced investment strategies. Conversely, during the crisis periods, commodities exhibit a resilience to both negative and positive shocks from geopolitical tensions, therefore, presenting diversification opportunities for investors. The causality frequency analysis emphasizes the complex dynamics between GPR and commodities in both the time and frequency domains. Our study also offers significant implications for investors, portfolio managers, and policymakers, advocating for recognition of the weak pre-conflict link between GPR and commodities.
引用
收藏
页数:29
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Geopolitical risk on energy, agriculture, livestock, precious and industrial metals: New from a Markov model [J].
Abid, Ilyes ;
Dhaoui, Abderrazak ;
Kaabia, Olfa ;
Tarchella, Salma .
RESOURCES POLICY, 2023, 85
[2]   Geopolitical risk and commodity future returns: Fresh insights from dynamic copula conditional value-at-risk approach [J].
Aloui, Riadh ;
Ben Jabeur, Sami ;
Rezgui, Hichem ;
Ben Arfi, Wissal .
RESOURCES POLICY, 2023, 85
[3]   The unprecedented reaction of equity and commodity markets to COVID-19 [J].
Amar, Amine Ben ;
Belaid, Fateh ;
Youssef, Adel Ben ;
Chiao, Benjamin ;
Guesmi, Khaled .
FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 38
[4]   Quantile Connectedness: Modeling Tail Behavior in the Topology of Financial Networks [J].
Ando, Tomohiro ;
Greenwood-Nimmo, Matthew ;
Shin, Yongcheol .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2022, 68 (04) :2401-2431
[5]   Forecasting volatility and co-volatility of crude oil and gold futures: Effects of leverage, jumps, spillovers, and geopolitical risks [J].
Asai, Manabu ;
Gupta, Rangan ;
McAleer, Michael .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 2020, 36 (03) :933-948
[6]   Crude Oil futures contracts and commodity markets: New evidence from a TVP-VAR extended joint connectedness approach [J].
Balcilar, Mehmet ;
Gabauer, David ;
Umar, Zaghum .
RESOURCES POLICY, 2021, 73
[7]   Second-order moment risk connectedness across climate and geopolitical risk and global commodity markets [J].
Banerjee, Ameet Kumar .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2024, 235
[8]   Hedging geopolitical risk with precious metals [J].
Baur, Dirk G. ;
Smales, Lee A. .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2020, 117
[9]   Hedging Geopolitical Risks with Different Asset Classes: A Focus on the Russian Invasion of Ukraine [J].
Bedowska-Sojka, Barbara ;
Demir, Ender ;
Zaremba, Adam .
FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 50
[10]   Testing for short- and long-run causality: A frequency-domain approach [J].
Breitung, Jorg ;
Candelon, Bertrand .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2006, 132 (02) :363-378