Circular bioeconomy: A review of empirical practices across implementation scales

被引:1
作者
Bianchi, Marco [1 ]
Cascavilla, Alessandro [2 ]
Diaz, Janire Clavell [1 ]
Ladu, Luana [3 ,4 ]
Blazquez, Barbara Palacino [5 ]
Pierre, Menger [1 ]
Staffieri, Eleonora [2 ]
Yilan, Guelsah [2 ]
机构
[1] Basque Res & Technol Alliance BRTA, TECNALIA, Astondo Bidea,Edificio700, E-48160 Derio, Bizkaia, Spain
[2] UnitelmaSapienza Univ Rome, Bioecon Transit Res Grp, I-00161 Rome, Italy
[3] Bundesanstalt Materialforsch & Prufung BAM, Unter Eichen 87, D-12205 Berlin, Germany
[4] Tech Univ Berlin TUB, Str 17 Juni 135, D-10623 Berlin, Germany
[5] CIRCE Fdn, Parque Empresarial Dinamiza, Avda Ranillas,Edificio 3D,1 Planta, Zaragoza 50018, Spain
关键词
Bioeconomy; Circular economy; Sustainable transition; Bioeconomy monitoring framework; Bioeconomy indicators; Life cycle management; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; EUROPEAN-UNION; SUSTAINABILITY; INDICATORS; ECONOMY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143816
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The European Commission has endorsed the transition to a circular bioeconomy as a crucial initiative to achieve a sustainable and climate-neutral European Union. However, this transition is inherently complex, as it involves environmental and social risks, physical limitations, and trade-offs between different dimensions of sustainability. In this context, effective monitoring and modelling of the bioeconomy are essential tools to inform decision-making at various implementation scales. This article reviews empirical research on the monitoring and modelling of the bioeconomy and their implications for decision-making across three main implementation scales: macro (national-global level); meso (regional-city level); and micro (single product, company level). The contribution of this research is twofold: First, it explores existing gaps in the field through the lens of policy implementation levels. Research gaps include the uneven distribution of indicators among sustainability pillars, the lack of standardised monitoring frameworks at the meso and micro levels, and attribution issues in bioeconomy modelling. Second, the article outlines a comprehensive research agenda, indicating specific research lines and their relevance to different implementation scales. Key research avenues, significant at all implementation scales, include enhancing the life cycle perspective, visualising trade-offs and synergies between Sustainable Development Goals, monetising externalities, and further delving into social aspects.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Circular economy, bioeconomy, and sustainable development goals: a systematic literature review
    Ferraz, Diogo
    Pyka, Andreas
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (47)
  • [32] Implementing Circular-Bioeconomy Principles across Two Value Chains of the Wood-Based Sector: A Conceptual Approach
    Aggestam, Filip
    Giurca, Alexandru
    LAND, 2022, 11 (11)
  • [33] Studying the Transition towards a Circular Bioeconomy-A Systematic Literature Review on Transition Studies and Existing Barriers
    Gottinger, Alexandra
    Ladu, Luana
    Quitzow, Rainer
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (21) : 1 - 27
  • [34] A review of natural astaxanthin production in a circular bioeconomy context using Paracoccus carotinifaciens
    Mussagy, Cassamo U.
    Dufosse, Laurent
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 369
  • [35] Organic waste recycling for carbon smart circular bioeconomy and sustainable development: A review
    Awasthi, Mukesh Kumar
    Yan, Binghua
    Sar, Taner
    Gomez-Garcia, Ricardo
    Ren, Liheng
    Sharma, Pooja
    Binod, Parameswaran
    Sindhu, Raveendran
    Kumar, Vinod
    Kumar, Deepak
    Mohamed, Badr A.
    Zhang, Zengqiang
    Taherzadeh, Mohammad J.
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 360
  • [36] Residual Biomass: A Comprehensive Review on the Importance, Uses and Potential in a Circular Bioeconomy Approach
    Casau, Margarida
    Dias, Marta Ferreira
    Matias, Joao C. O.
    Nunes, Leonel J. R.
    RESOURCES-BASEL, 2022, 11 (04):
  • [37] Insights of microalgae-based aquaculture feed: A review on circular bioeconomy and perspectives
    Tham, Pei En
    Lim, Hooi Ren
    Khoo, Kuan Shiong
    Chew, Kit Wayne
    Yap, Yee Jiun
    Munawaroh, Heli Siti Halimatul
    Ma, Zengling
    Rajendran, Saravanan
    Gnanasekaran, Lalitha
    Show, Pau Loke
    ALGAL RESEARCH-BIOMASS BIOFUELS AND BIOPRODUCTS, 2023, 74
  • [38] Innovative circular bioeconomy and decarbonization approaches in palm oil waste management: A review
    Goh, Kai Chen
    Kurniawan, Tonni Agustiono
    Alsultan, G. Abdulkareem
    Othman, Mohd Hafiz Dzarfan
    Anouzla, Abdelkader
    Aziz, Faissal
    Ali, Imran
    Casila, Joan Cecilia C.
    Khan, Muhammad Imran
    Zhang, Dongdong
    Onn, Choo Wou
    Seow, Ta Wee
    Shafii, Haryati
    PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2025, 195
  • [39] Exploring the challenges for circular business implementation in manufacturing companies: An empirical investigation of a pay-per-use service provider
    Sousa-Zomer, Thayla T.
    Magalhaes, Lucas
    Zancul, Eduardo
    Cauchick-Miguel, Paulo A.
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2018, 135 : 3 - 13
  • [40] The role of interorganizational collaboration and digital technologies in the implementation of circular economy practices-Empirical evidence from manufacturing firms
    Schoeggl, Josef-Peter
    Stumpf, Lukas
    Baumgartner, Rupert J.
    BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 33 (03) : 2225 - 2249