Circular bioeconomy: A review of empirical practices across implementation scales

被引:1
作者
Bianchi, Marco [1 ]
Cascavilla, Alessandro [2 ]
Diaz, Janire Clavell [1 ]
Ladu, Luana [3 ,4 ]
Blazquez, Barbara Palacino [5 ]
Pierre, Menger [1 ]
Staffieri, Eleonora [2 ]
Yilan, Guelsah [2 ]
机构
[1] Basque Res & Technol Alliance BRTA, TECNALIA, Astondo Bidea,Edificio700, E-48160 Derio, Bizkaia, Spain
[2] UnitelmaSapienza Univ Rome, Bioecon Transit Res Grp, I-00161 Rome, Italy
[3] Bundesanstalt Materialforsch & Prufung BAM, Unter Eichen 87, D-12205 Berlin, Germany
[4] Tech Univ Berlin TUB, Str 17 Juni 135, D-10623 Berlin, Germany
[5] CIRCE Fdn, Parque Empresarial Dinamiza, Avda Ranillas,Edificio 3D,1 Planta, Zaragoza 50018, Spain
关键词
Bioeconomy; Circular economy; Sustainable transition; Bioeconomy monitoring framework; Bioeconomy indicators; Life cycle management; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; EUROPEAN-UNION; SUSTAINABILITY; INDICATORS; ECONOMY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143816
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The European Commission has endorsed the transition to a circular bioeconomy as a crucial initiative to achieve a sustainable and climate-neutral European Union. However, this transition is inherently complex, as it involves environmental and social risks, physical limitations, and trade-offs between different dimensions of sustainability. In this context, effective monitoring and modelling of the bioeconomy are essential tools to inform decision-making at various implementation scales. This article reviews empirical research on the monitoring and modelling of the bioeconomy and their implications for decision-making across three main implementation scales: macro (national-global level); meso (regional-city level); and micro (single product, company level). The contribution of this research is twofold: First, it explores existing gaps in the field through the lens of policy implementation levels. Research gaps include the uneven distribution of indicators among sustainability pillars, the lack of standardised monitoring frameworks at the meso and micro levels, and attribution issues in bioeconomy modelling. Second, the article outlines a comprehensive research agenda, indicating specific research lines and their relevance to different implementation scales. Key research avenues, significant at all implementation scales, include enhancing the life cycle perspective, visualising trade-offs and synergies between Sustainable Development Goals, monetising externalities, and further delving into social aspects.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Food waste valorization advocating Circular Bioeconomy - A critical review of potentialities and perspectives of spent coffee grounds biorefinery
    Zabaniotou, Anastasia
    Kamaterou, Paraskevi
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 211 : 1553 - 1566
  • [22] Complementarity of circular economy practices: an empirical analysis of Chinese manufacturers
    Yang, Yang
    Chen, Lujie
    Jia, Fu
    Xu, Zhiduan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2019, 57 (20) : 6369 - 6384
  • [23] Life cycle assessment and circular practices in the woodworking sector: a systematic review
    van den Auwelant, Ewald
    Nimmegeers, Philippe
    Van Passel, Steven
    CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2024, : 1673 - 1692
  • [24] Innovation Strategies and Implementation of Various Circular Economy Practices: Findings from an Empirical Study in France
    Arfaoui, Nabila
    Le Bas, Christian
    Vernier, Marie-France
    Vo, Linh-Chi
    JOURNAL OF INNOVATION ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT, 2023, (42): : 149 - 183
  • [25] What Makes Farmers Aware in Adopting Circular Bioeconomy Practices? Evidence from a Greek Rural Region
    Papadopoulou, Christina-Ioanna
    Loizou, Efstratios
    Chatzitheodoridis, Fotios
    Michailidis, Anastasios
    Karelakis, Christos
    Fallas, Yannis
    Paltaki, Aikaterini
    LAND, 2023, 12 (04)
  • [26] Incorporating biowaste into circular bioeconomy: A critical review of current trend and scaling up feasibility
    Cheng, Sze Yin
    Tan, Xuefei
    Show, Pau Loke
    Rambabu, K.
    Banat, Fawzi
    Veeramuthu, Ashokkumar
    Lau, Beng Fye
    Ng, Eng Poh
    Ling, Tau Chuan
    ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION, 2020, 19
  • [27] Industrial Symbiosis: A Mechanism to Guarantee the Implementation of Circular Economy Practices
    Castellet-Viciano, Lledo
    Hernandez-Chover, Vicent
    Bellver-Domingo, Agueda
    Hernandez-Sancho, Francesc
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (23)
  • [28] A comprehensive review on integrating sustainable practices and circular economy principles in concrete industry
    Barbhuiya, Salim
    Das, Bibhuti Bhusan
    Adak, Dibyendu
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 370
  • [29] Review of potential and prospective strategies for the valorization of coffee grounds within the framework of a sustainable and circular bioeconomy
    Arias, Ana
    Ioannidou, Sofia Maria
    Giannakis, Nikos
    Feijoo, Gumersindo
    Moreira, Maria Teresa
    Koutinas, Apostolis
    INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS, 2023, 205
  • [30] Towards a Territorial and Political Ecology of "circular bioeconomy": a 30-year review of metabolism studies
    Joxe, Simon
    Bahers, Jean-Baptiste
    CAMBRIDGE JOURNAL OF REGIONS ECONOMY AND SOCIETY, 2024, 17 (03) : 717 - 731