Circular bioeconomy: A review of empirical practices across implementation scales

被引:1
作者
Bianchi, Marco [1 ]
Cascavilla, Alessandro [2 ]
Diaz, Janire Clavell [1 ]
Ladu, Luana [3 ,4 ]
Blazquez, Barbara Palacino [5 ]
Pierre, Menger [1 ]
Staffieri, Eleonora [2 ]
Yilan, Guelsah [2 ]
机构
[1] Basque Res & Technol Alliance BRTA, TECNALIA, Astondo Bidea,Edificio700, E-48160 Derio, Bizkaia, Spain
[2] UnitelmaSapienza Univ Rome, Bioecon Transit Res Grp, I-00161 Rome, Italy
[3] Bundesanstalt Materialforsch & Prufung BAM, Unter Eichen 87, D-12205 Berlin, Germany
[4] Tech Univ Berlin TUB, Str 17 Juni 135, D-10623 Berlin, Germany
[5] CIRCE Fdn, Parque Empresarial Dinamiza, Avda Ranillas,Edificio 3D,1 Planta, Zaragoza 50018, Spain
关键词
Bioeconomy; Circular economy; Sustainable transition; Bioeconomy monitoring framework; Bioeconomy indicators; Life cycle management; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; EUROPEAN-UNION; SUSTAINABILITY; INDICATORS; ECONOMY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143816
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The European Commission has endorsed the transition to a circular bioeconomy as a crucial initiative to achieve a sustainable and climate-neutral European Union. However, this transition is inherently complex, as it involves environmental and social risks, physical limitations, and trade-offs between different dimensions of sustainability. In this context, effective monitoring and modelling of the bioeconomy are essential tools to inform decision-making at various implementation scales. This article reviews empirical research on the monitoring and modelling of the bioeconomy and their implications for decision-making across three main implementation scales: macro (national-global level); meso (regional-city level); and micro (single product, company level). The contribution of this research is twofold: First, it explores existing gaps in the field through the lens of policy implementation levels. Research gaps include the uneven distribution of indicators among sustainability pillars, the lack of standardised monitoring frameworks at the meso and micro levels, and attribution issues in bioeconomy modelling. Second, the article outlines a comprehensive research agenda, indicating specific research lines and their relevance to different implementation scales. Key research avenues, significant at all implementation scales, include enhancing the life cycle perspective, visualising trade-offs and synergies between Sustainable Development Goals, monetising externalities, and further delving into social aspects.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Antecedents for circular bioeconomy practices towards sustainability of supply chain
    Moktadir, Md Abdul
    Dwivedi, Ashish
    Rahman, Towfique
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 348
  • [2] Circular Bioeconomy: A Review on the Current State and Future Opportunities
    Gkountani, Vasiliki A.
    Tsoulfas, Giannis T.
    DIGITAL ECONOMY AND THE GREEN REVOLUTION, ICBE 2022, 2023, : 277 - 286
  • [3] Advancing circular bioeconomy: A critical review and assessment of indicators
    Mesa, Jaime A.
    Sierra-Fontalvo, Lesly
    Ortegon, Katherine
    Gonzalez-Quiroga, Arturo
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2024, 46 : 324 - 342
  • [4] Sustainability, circular economy and bioeconomy: A conceptual review and integration into the notion of sustainable circular bioeconomy
    Rojas-Serrano, Fatima
    Garcia-Garcia, Guillermo
    Parra-Lopez, Carlos
    Sayadi-Gmada, Samir
    NEW MEDIT, 2024, 23 (02): : 3 - 22
  • [5] Biorefineries in circular bioeconomy: A comprehensive review
    Ubando, Aristotle T.
    Felix, Charles B.
    Chen, Wei-Hsin
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 299
  • [6] Redesigning a bioenergy sector in EU in the transition to circular waste-based Bioeconomy-A multidisciplinary review
    Zabaniotou, A.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 177 : 197 - 206
  • [7] Food Plastic Packaging Transition towards Circular Bioeconomy: A Systematic Review of Literature
    Beltran, Macarena
    Tjahjono, Benny
    Bogush, Anna
    Juliao, Jorge
    Teixeira, Evandro L. S.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (07)
  • [8] Biohydrogen in a circular bioeconomy: A critical review
    Ubando, Aristotle T.
    Chen, Wei-Hsin
    Hurt, Dennis A.
    Conversion, Ariel
    Rajendran, Saravanan
    Lin, Sheng-Lun
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 366
  • [9] Unlocking potential for a circular bioeconomy transition through digital innovation, lean manufacturing and green practices: a review
    Halim-Lim, Sarina Abdul
    Jamaludin, Adi Ainurzaman
    Islam, A. S. M. Touhidul
    Weerabahu, Samanthi
    Priyono, Anjar
    MANAGEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2025, 36 (01) : 130 - 154
  • [10] Towards a sustainable and circular blue bioeconomy: A scoping review
    Pakseresht, Ashkan
    Kermani, Alireza
    Decker-Lange, Carolin
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2025, 216