Safety and Immunogenicity of Trivalent Oral Polio Vaccine in Vaccinated Children and Vaccine-Naïve Infants: A Phase 4 Study

被引:0
作者
Mejia, Luis Rivera [1 ]
Mendez, Lourdes Pena [2 ]
Ruttimann, Ricardo W. [3 ]
Gast, Chris [4 ]
Bandyopadhyay, Ananda Sankar [4 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Maternidad Nuestra Senora Altagracia, Fdn Dominicana Perinatol PROBEBE, Calle Pedro Henriquez Urena 49, Santo Domingo 10205, Dominican Rep
[2] Clin Cruz Jiminian, Av Ortega y Gasset 90, Santo Domingo 10501, Dominican Rep
[3] Fighting Infect Dis Emerging Countries FIDEC, 2050 Coral Way, Suite 407, Miami, FL 33145 USA
[4] Bill & Melinda Gates Fdn, Seattle, WA 98109 USA
基金
比尔及梅琳达.盖茨基金会;
关键词
poliomyelitis; eradication; trivalent oral polio vaccine; IMMUNIZATION; WORLDWIDE; POLIOMYELITIS; WITHDRAWAL; SCHEDULES; OUTBREAKS;
D O I
10.3390/vaccines12090953
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
In the context of polio eradication, novel oral polio vaccines for type 2 (nOPV2) were developed, and types 1 and 3 polioviruses are being developed. We aimed to generate trivalent oral poliovirus vaccine (tOPV) safety and immunogenicity data as a reference for comparing with novel OPV formulations. This was a single-center, open-label, phase 4 study in March 2016 in the Dominican Republic with healthy children previously vaccinated with >= 3 doses of tOPV receiving one dose of tOPV and vaccine-na & iuml;ve infants receiving 3 doses of tOPV. Safety and immunogenicity were assessed. No serious adverse reactions or important medical reactions were reported. Seroconversion (SC) rates at Day 28 in children were 32.7%, 36.7%, and 46.9% for types 1, 2, and 3, respectively, and seroprotection (SP) rates 28 days after one dose increased from 89.8% at baseline to 93.9%, 98.0% to 100%, and 83.7% to 98.0% for types 1, 2, and 3, respectively. In infants, SC rates were 88.5%, 98.1%, and 96.2% for types 1, 2, and 3, respectively. SP rates at Day 84 were 93.3%, 100%, and 96.2% for types 1, 2, and 3, respectively. This information can be used as a reference to compare with novel monovalent or trivalent OPVs under development.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Wkly Epidemiol Rec, V91, P145
[2]  
[Anonymous], GLOBAL POLIO ERADICA
[3]  
Bahl S, 2014, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V63, pCOVER1
[4]   Immunogenicity of New Primary Immunization Schedules With Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine and Bivalent Oral Polio Vaccine for the Polio Endgame: A Review [J].
Bandyopadhyay, Ananda S. ;
Modlin, John F. ;
Wenger, Jay ;
Gast, Chris .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2018, 67 :S35-S41
[5]  
Bigouette JP, 2023, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V72, P366, DOI 10.15585/mmwr.mm7214a3
[6]   Type 2 Poliovirus Detection after Global Withdrawal of Trivalent Oral Vaccine [J].
Blake, Isobel M. ;
Pons-Salort, Margarita ;
Molodecky, Natalie A. ;
Diop, Ousmane M. ;
Chenoweth, Paul ;
Bandyopadhyay, Ananda S. ;
Zaffran, Michel ;
Sutter, Roland W. ;
Grassly, Nicholas C. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2018, 379 (09) :834-845
[7]   The role of a genetically stable, novel oral type 2 poliovirus vaccine in the poliomyelitis endgame [J].
Clemens, Sue Ann Costa ;
Santos, Gustavo Mendes Lima ;
Gonzalez, Isabela ;
Clemens, Ralf .
REVISTA PANAMERICANA DE SALUD PUBLICA-PAN AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 47
[8]  
Containment Advisory Group, 2018, Report of CAG TC3 on NOPV2 Candidate Vaccines and S19- Poliovirus Type 2 Strains
[9]  
Global Polio Eradication Initiative, 2023, Key Points about Poliovirus Containment
[10]   Global oral poliovirus vaccine stockpile management as an essential preparedness and response mechanism for type 2 poliovirus outbreaks following global oral poliovirus vaccine type 2 withdrawal q [J].
Harutyunyan, Vachagan ;
Quddus, Arshad ;
Pallansch, Mark ;
Zipursky, Simona ;
Woods, David ;
Ottosen, Ann ;
Vertefeuille, John ;
Lewis, Ian .
VACCINE, 2023, 41 :A70-A78