Adductor Canal Block Versus Femoral Nerve Block in Total Knee Arthroplasty Network Meta-Analysis

被引:3
作者
Berikashvili, Levan B. [1 ,2 ]
Yadgarov, Mikhail Ya. [1 ]
Kuzovlev, Artem N. [1 ]
Smirnova, Anastasia V. [1 ,3 ]
Kadantseva, Kristina K. [1 ,4 ]
Kuznetsov, Ivan V. [1 ]
Polyakov, Petr A. [1 ]
Likhvantsev, Valery V. [1 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Fed Res & Clin Ctr Intens Care Med & Rehabilitol, Moscow, Russia
[2] Vladimirsky Moscow Reg Res Clin Inst, Moscow, Russia
[3] City Clin Oncol Hosp 1, Moscow, Russia
[4] A Loginov Moscow Clin Sci Ctr, Moscow, Russia
[5] First Moscow State Med Univ, Moscow, Russia
[6] Fed Res & Clin Ctr Intens Care Med & Rehabilitol, Dept Clin Trials, 25 Petrovka str, Moscow 107031, Russia
关键词
total knee arthroplasty; adductor canal block; femoral nerve block; pain; opioids; EARLY FUNCTIONAL RECOVERY; POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA; SINGLE-INJECTION; AMBULATION ABILITY; PAIN MANAGEMENT; REPLACEMENT; CATHETER; SURGERY; ANESTHESIA; STATEMENT;
D O I
10.1097/AJP.0000000000001214
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objectives:The quality of postoperative analgesia in total knee arthroplasty is crucial for patient recovery, rehabilitation, and hospital stay duration. In line with the above, a single-shot adductor canal block has been considered as an improved method over continuous femoral nerve block. However, continuous adductor canal block and single-shot femoral nerve block have been not adequately addressed in the discussion. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of various types of adductor and femoral nerve blocks on clinically relevant outcomes in patients following total knee arthroplasty. Methods:A systematic review and network meta-analysis were conducted following "PRISMA-NMA" and Cochrane Handbook guidelines. The eligibility criteria included randomized trials and, where these were lacking for a comparison, nonrandomized studies involving adults undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty, comparing single-shot adductor canal block, continuous adductor canal block, single-shot femoral nerve block, and continuous femoral nerve block. Results:A total of 36 studies involving 3308 patients were included. Single-shot adductor canal block showed higher pain scores and opioid consumption but better functional recovery at 24 h compared with continuous femoral nerve block. However, this trend vanishes by the 48 h assessment postsurgery. Continuous adductor canal block required higher opioid consumption but better functional recovery and shorter hospital stay compared with continuous femoral nerve block. Single-shot adductor canal block showed higher pain scores but comparable opioid consumption and functional recovery to continuous adductor canal block. Discussion:The shift from continuous femoral nerve block to single-shot adductor canal block as the preferred method for pain relief after total knee arthroplasty may be premature. While the latter improves mobility, it falls short in pain control and does not shorten hospital stays. Continuous adductor canal block shows promise but is currently underappreciated, and single-shot femoral nerve block is often overshadowed by other techniques in regional anesthesia. Further high-quality, multicenter randomized controlled trials are needed to validate these findings.
引用
收藏
页码:447 / 457
页数:11
相关论文
共 74 条
[31]   The analgesic efficacy of the continuous adductor canal block compared to continuous intravenous fentanyl infusion with a single-shot adductor canal block in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial [J].
Kim, Min Kyoung ;
Moon, Hyoung Yong ;
Ryu, Choon Gun ;
Kang, Hyun ;
Lee, Han Jun ;
Shin, Hwa Yong .
KOREAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2019, 32 (01) :30-38
[32]   Does Patient Perception Differ Following Adductor Canal Block and Femoral Nerve Block in Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Simultaneous Bilateral Randomized Study [J].
Koh, Hyun J. ;
Koh, In J. ;
Kim, Man S. ;
Choi, Keun Y. ;
Jo, Hyeon U. ;
In, Yong .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2017, 32 (06) :1856-1861
[33]   Adductor canal block versus continuous femoral nerve block in primary total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis [J].
Kuang, Ming-jie ;
Xu, Li-yan ;
Ma, Jian-xiong ;
Wang, Ying ;
Zhao, Jie ;
Lu, Bin ;
Ma, Xin-long .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 31 :17-24
[34]   Comparison of Adductor Canal Block and Femoral Nerve Block for Early Ambulation After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Kukreja, Promil ;
Bevinetto, Cara ;
Brooks, Brandon ;
McKissack, Haley ;
Montgomery, Tyler P. ;
Alexander, Bradley ;
Shah, Ashish .
CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 11 (12)
[35]   Similar early functional recovery after total knee replacement comparing single shot versus continuous saphenous nerve block: A randomised, double-blind trial [J].
Lam, Ho Yee Joyce ;
Tang, Yan Ho Bruce ;
Wong, Hok Leung ;
Yang, Isaac Bruce .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2020, 28 (02)
[36]   Pain management after total knee arthroplasty PROcedure SPEcific Postoperative Pain ManagemenT recommendations [J].
Lavand'homme, Patricia M. ;
Kehlet, Henrik ;
Rawal, Narinder ;
Joshi, Girish P. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2022, 39 (09) :743-757
[37]   A Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial of Adductor Canal Block for Analgesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Single Injection Versus Catheter Technique [J].
Lee, Steven ;
Rooban, Nirooshan ;
Vaghadia, Himat ;
Sawka, Andrew N. ;
Tang, Raymond .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2018, 33 (04) :1045-1051
[38]  
Li Canfeng, 2017, Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi, V31, P1049, DOI 10.7507/1002-1892.201704056
[39]   Effects of multi-site infiltration analgesia on pain management and early rehabilitation compared with femoral nerve or adductor canal block for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial [J].
Li, Donghai ;
Tan, Zhen ;
Kang, Pengde ;
Shen, Bin ;
Pei, Fuxing .
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2017, 41 (01) :75-83
[40]   A randomised controlled trial comparing adductor canal block and femoral nerve block for knee arthroplasty [J].
Lim, Yean Chin ;
Quek, How Yow Kelvin ;
Phoo, Wai Heng Jimmy ;
Mah, Chou Liang ;
Tang, Shumei .
SINGAPORE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 60 (03) :145-149