Applying the Participatory Evaluation Measurement Instrument in the Evaluation of a Public School Program for Teachers

被引:0
作者
Pho, Ha [1 ]
Dyer, Marian A. [1 ]
Vallejos, Jaime [1 ]
Lohmeier, Jill Hendrickson [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Sch Educ, Lowell, MA 01854 USA
关键词
participatory evaluation; participatory evaluation measurement instruments; PEMI; stakeholder participation; evaluation theory; evaluation practice; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1177/10982140241241048
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Although most evaluators are familiar with participatory evaluation (PE), the ability to measure stakeholder participation in an evaluation remains challenging. Based on Cousins and Whitmore's (1998) PE theoretical model, Daigneault and Jacob (2009, 2012, 2014) developed an instrument for measuring the degree to which an evaluation can be considered participatory. The present study used Daigneault and Jacob's Participatory Evaluation Measurement Instrument (PEMI) in the evaluation of a public school district's educator mentoring program. The evaluators examined the benefits and challenges of using the instrument in public school settings. This paper details the procedure of using PEMI to explore the level of stakeholder participation in the evaluation case and uses a process similar to the mini-ethnography method to reflect on the experiences of the evaluators through the procedure. Findings show that in addition to accurately capturing the perceived level of participation, PEMI may be utilized in the planning phases of evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:579 / 591
页数:13
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Alkin M.C., 1979, Using evaluations: Does evaluation make a difference?
  • [2] Alkin MC, 1998, ADV EDUC PR, V7, P87
  • [3] Is Microethnography an Ethnographic Case Study? and/or a mini-ethnographic case study? An analysis of the literature
    Bayeck, Rebecca Y.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2023, 22
  • [4] Working with evaluation stakeholders: A rationale, step-wise approach and toolkit
    Bryson, John M.
    Patton, Michael Quinn
    Bowman, Ruth A.
    [J]. EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING, 2011, 34 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [5] The Case for Participatory Evaluation in an Era of Accountability
    Chouinard, Jill Anne
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EVALUATION, 2013, 34 (02) : 237 - 253
  • [6] Assessing vital signs: Applying two participatory evaluation frameworks to the evaluation of a college of nursing
    Connors, Susan C.
    Magilvy, Joan K.
    [J]. EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING, 2011, 34 (02) : 79 - 86
  • [7] Cousins J.B., 1998, NEW DIRECTIONS EVALU, V80, P5, DOI DOI 10.1002/EV.1114
  • [8] Cousins JB, 2012, EVAL SOCIET, P1
  • [9] THE CASE FOR PARTICIPATORY EVALUATION
    COUSINS, JB
    EARL, LM
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSIS, 1992, 14 (04) : 397 - 418
  • [10] Cullen A., 2011, Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, V7, P32, DOI 10.56645/jmde.v7i16.288