A THEORY-GUIDED MACHINE LEARNING AND REDUCED-ORDER FINITE ELEMENT MODELING FRAMEWORK TO ACCELERATE PROCESS SIMULATION OF AEROSPACE COMPOSITE PARTS

被引:0
作者
Fu, Huilong [1 ]
Zobeiry, Navid [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Mat Sci & Engn, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2023 AEROSPACE STRUCTURES, STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, AND MATERIALS CONFERENCE, SSDM2023 | 2023年
关键词
Theory-Guided Machine Learning; Reduced-Order Modeling; Aerospace Composites; Finite Element; Simulation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Finite Element (FE) analysis is widely used for process simulation of advanced composites in aerospace applications. However, as the fidelity of FE models improves, the cost and time to calibrate, setup and perform simulations also increases significantly. To speed-up process simulation, reduced-order FE can be used. Reduced-order FE and Machine Learning (ML) can be combined to further speed-up the process simulation and enable process optimization. However, theory-agnostic ML usually requires large datasets which may not be feasible in industry. This can be mitigated by integrating the underlying physics into ML to develop Theory-Guided Machine Learning (TGML) models. In this study, for process simulation and optimization of a composite stringer on a wing skin, three modeling approaches are compared: 1) high-fidelity FE modeling, 2) surrogate ML modeling based on high-fidelity FE results, and 3) surrogate TGML modeling based on both high-fidelity and low-fidelity FE results. It is shown that TGML, with the guidance of underlying physics of composites curing, can improve prediction accuracy and significantly reduce the amount of data needed for training compared to theory-agnostic ML.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2014, COMPRO simulation software
  • [2] HEXCEL, 2016, HexPly 8552 Epoxy matrix (180C/365F curing matrix) Product Data
  • [3] Humfeld K.D., SAMPE VIRT C 2021 C
  • [4] A machine learning framework for real-time inverse modeling and multi-objective process optimization of composites for active manufacturing control
    Humfeld, Keith D.
    Gu, Dawei
    Butler, Geoffrey A.
    Nelson, Karl
    Zobeiry, Navid
    [J]. COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING, 2021, 223
  • [5] Theory-Guided Data Science: A New Paradigm for Scientific Discovery from Data
    Karpatne, Anuj
    Atluri, Gowtham
    Faghmous, James H.
    Steinbach, Michael
    Banerjee, Arindam
    Ganguly, Auroop
    Shekhar, Shashi
    Samatova, Nagiza
    Kumar, Vipin
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON KNOWLEDGE AND DATA ENGINEERING, 2017, 29 (10) : 2318 - 2331
  • [6] Kim M., 2021, Machine Learning for ReducedOrder Modeling of Composites Processing
  • [7] Predicting shim gaps in aircraft assembly with machine sparse sensing
    Manohar, Krithika
    Hogan, Thomas
    Buttrick, Jim
    Banerjee, Ashis G.
    Kutz, J. Nathan
    Brunton, Steven L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS, 2018, 48 : 87 - 95
  • [8] Efficient finite element simulation of compression after impact behaviour in quasi-isotropic composite laminates
    Reiner, Johannes
    Zobeiry, Navid
    Vaziri, Reza
    [J]. COMPOSITES COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 28
  • [9] Schoenholz C, 2023, SAMPE J, V59, P10
  • [10] Machine-Learning-Augmented Predictive Modeling of Turbulent Separated Flows over Airfoils
    Singh, Anand Pratap
    Medida, Shivaji
    Duraisamy, Karthik
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 2017, 55 (07) : 2215 - 2227