Life cycle cost assessment of geothermal energy assisted hydrogen liquefaction for sustainable and renewable energy applications: Case study and adaptation for Afyon geothermal power plant

被引:8
作者
Yilmaz, Ceyhun [1 ]
Korkmaz, Suleyman Aykut [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Afyon Kocatepe Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Afyon, Turkiye
[2] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Dept Marine Engn, Izmir, Turkiye
[3] Univ Southampton, Maritime Engn, Southampton, England
关键词
Geothermal energy; Hydrogen liquefaction; Life cycle cost analysis; Performance analysis; OPTIMIZATION; PERFORMANCE; ECONOMY; EXERGY; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.05.417
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
This study presents a comprehensive Life Cycle Cost Assessment (LCCA) of geothermal-assisted hydrogen liquefaction, explicitly focusing on the Afyon Geothermal Power Plant (AGPP) as a case study. The study evaluates the economic viability and sustainability of integrating geothermal energy into hydrogen liquefaction. The results of the LCCA contribute to the ongoing discourse on sustainable energy solutions, offering a nuanced understanding of the economic considerations associated with geothermal-assisted hydrogen liquefaction. The study serves as a model for assessing the economic feasibility of similar systems, fostering informed decisionmaking in the pursuit of cleaner and more economically sustainable energy pathways. This study has conducted a technical and economic investigation of liquid hydrogen production using geothermal heat and electricity effects. Geothermal water pre-cools the hydrogen by providing heat to the absorption system. Then, the electricity generated in the geothermal plant is used to work in the liquefaction cycle. The generated electricity is used to liquefy hydrogen in the liquefaction cycle. The capacity of the electricity generated from the AGPP produced here is 2621 kW. The proposed system can be achieved by pre-cooling unit H2 up to -30 degrees C at 120 degrees C and 150 kg/s geothermal source. In the liquefaction cycle, 0.84 kg/s H2 can be liquefied. As a result, the total energy efficiency of the proposed system can be calculated as 32.4% and exergy efficiency as 15.4%. The system's net present value (NPV) was calculated as 65,320,000 $. When life cycle cost analysis was performed using the levelized annual cost (LAC) method, the project's levelized cost was calculated as 7,673,000 $/yr. The unit cost of the liquid hydrogen produced is 1.252 $/kg. This system's discounted payback period (Ndpp) is calculated as 3.48.
引用
收藏
页码:772 / 788
页数:17
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Large-scale liquid hydrogen production methods and approaches: A review [J].
Aasadnia, Majid ;
Mehrpooya, Mehdi .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 212 :57-83
[2]   Bridging the energy future: The role and potential of hydrogen co-firing with natural gas [J].
Abdin, Zainul .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 436
[3]   A compact production plant model for green hydrogen production from medium temperature geothermal resources: A case study of the Van Lake-Zilan location [J].
Akdag, Ozan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2024, 50 :199-210
[4]   Life cycle cost analysis (LCCA) of construction projects: sustainability perspective [J].
Altaf, Muhammad ;
Alaloul, Wesam Salah ;
Musarat, Muhammad Ali ;
Qureshi, Abdul Hannan .
ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 25 (11) :12071-12118
[5]   Thermodynamic performance evaluation of a geothermal ORC power plant [J].
Altun, A. F. ;
Kilic, M. .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 148 :261-274
[6]   Hydrogen production through renewable and non-renewable energy processes and their impact on climate change [J].
Amin, Muhammad ;
Shah, Hamad Hussain ;
Fareed, Anaiz Gul ;
Khan, Wasim Ullah ;
Chung, Eunhyea ;
Zia, Adeel ;
Farooqi, Zia Ur Rahman ;
Lee, Chaehyeon .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2022, 47 (77) :33112-33134
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Aspen Plus
[8]   An exergy-based investigation on hydrogen liquefaction plant-exergy, exergoeconomic, and exergoenvironmental analyses [J].
Ansarinasab, Hojat ;
Mehrpooya, Mehdi ;
Sadeghzadeh, Milad .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 210 :530-541
[9]   Multi-criteria optimization of a new geothermal driven integrated power and hydrogen production system via a new Index: Economic sustainability (EcoSI) [J].
Arslan, Oguz ;
Arslan, Asli Ergenekon .
FUEL, 2024, 358
[10]   ORC fluids selection for a bottoming binary geothermal power plant integrated with a CSP plant [J].
Boukelia, T. E. ;
Arslan, O. ;
Djimli, S. ;
Kabar, Y. .
ENERGY, 2023, 265