Data-driven aeroelastic analyses of structures in turbulent wind conditions using enhanced Gaussian Processes with aerodynamic priors

被引:1
作者
Kavrakov, Igor [1 ]
Morgenthal, Guido [2 ]
McRobie, Allan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Engn, JJ Thomson Ave 7a, Cambridge CB3 0FA, England
[2] Bauhaus Univ Weimar, Chair Modeling & Simulat Struct, Marienstr 13, D-99423 Weimar, Germany
关键词
Gaussian Processes; Data-driven; Structural aerodynamics; Aeroelasticity; Machine learning; Buffeting; Flutter; PSEUDO-3D VORTEX METHOD; BRIDGES; ADMITTANCE; SECTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jweia.2024.105848
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Recent advancements in data-driven aeroelasticity have been driven by the wealth of data available in the wind engineering practice, especially in modeling aerodynamic forces. Despite progress, challenges persist in addressing free-stream turbulence and incorporating physics knowledge into data-driven aerodynamic force models. This paper presents a hybrid Gaussian Process (GPs) methodology for non-linear modeling of aerodynamic forces induced by gusts and motion on bluff bodies. Building on a recently developed GP model of the motion-induced forces, we formulate a hybrid GP aerodynamic force model that incorporates both gust- and motion-induced angles of attack as exogenous inputs, alongside a semi-analytical quasi-steady (QS) model as a physics-based prior knowledge. In this manner, the GP model incorporates the absent physics of the QS model, and the non-dimensional hybrid formulation enhances its appeal from an aerodynamic perspective. We devise a training procedure that leverages simultaneous input signals of gust angles, based on random free-stream turbulence, and motion angles, based on random broadband signals. We verify the methodology through analytical linear aerodynamics of a flat plate and non-linear aerodynamics of a bridge deck using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). The standout feature of the presented methodology is its applicability for aeroelastic buffeting analyses, showcasing robustness when handling broadband excitation. Importantly, the non-linear hybrid model preserves its capability to capture higher-order harmonics in the motion-induced forces and remains applicable for flutter analysis, while incorporating both motion and gust angles as input. Applications of the methodology are anticipated in the aeroelastic analysis and monitoring of slender line-like structures.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Prediction of aeroelastic response of bridge decks using artificial neural networks [J].
Abbas, Tajammal ;
Kavrakov, Igor ;
Morgenthal, Guido ;
Lahmer, Tom .
COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2020, 231
[2]   Methods for flutter stability analysis of long-span bridges: A review [J].
Abbas, Tajammal ;
Kavrakov, Igor ;
Morgenthal, Guido .
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Bridge Engineering, 2017, 170 (04) :271-310
[3]   Low speed flutter and limit cycle oscillations of a two-degree-of-freedom flat plate in a wind tunnel [J].
Amandolese, X. ;
Michelin, S. ;
Choquel, M. .
JOURNAL OF FLUIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2013, 43 :244-255
[4]   Buffeting response of a suspension bridge based on the 2D rational function approximation model for self-excited forces [J].
Barni, Niccolo ;
Oiseth, Ole A. ;
Mannini, Claudio .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2022, 261
[5]  
Bearman P. W., 1983, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, V20, P97, DOI 10.1016/0376-0421(83)90002-7
[6]  
Calandra R, 2016, IEEE IJCNN, P3338, DOI 10.1109/IJCNN.2016.7727626
[7]   Advances in modeling of aerodynamic forces on bridge decks [J].
Chen, XZ ;
Kareem, A .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2002, 128 (11) :1193-1205
[8]  
Clough R. W., 1975, Dynamics of Structures
[9]  
Cottet G-H., 2000, VORTEX METHODS THEOR
[10]  
Davenport A. G., 1962, P I CIVIL ENG, V23, P389, DOI [DOI 10.1680/IICEP.1962.10876, 10.1680/iicep.1962.10876]