Hybrid algorithm of Bayesian optimization and evolutionary algorithm in crystal structure prediction

被引:4
|
作者
Yamashita, Tomoki [1 ]
Kino, Hiori [2 ]
Tsuda, Koji [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Miyake, Takashi [5 ]
Oguchi, Tamio [6 ]
机构
[1] Nagaoka Univ TechnologyTop Runner Incubat Ctr Acad, Fus, Nagaoka, Japan
[2] Natl Inst Mat Sci, Res & Serv Div Mat Data & Integrated Syst, Tsukuba, Japan
[3] Univ Tokyo, Grad Sch Frontier Sci, Kashiwa, Japan
[4] RIKEN, Ctr Adv Intelligence Project, Tokyo, Japan
[5] Natl Inst Adv Ind Sci & Technol, Res Ctr Computat Design Adv Funct Mat, Tsukuba, Japan
[6] Osaka Univ, Ctr Spintron Res Network, Toyonaka, Japan
来源
SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF ADVANCED MATERIALS-METHODS | 2022年 / 2卷 / 01期
基金
日本科学技术振兴机构;
关键词
Crystal structure prediction; Bayesian optimization; evolutionary algorithm; first-principles calculations; machine learning; materials informatics; TOTAL-ENERGY CALCULATIONS; WAVE; PSEUDOPOTENTIALS; CHEMISTRY;
D O I
10.1080/27660400.2022.2055987
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
We propose a highly efficient searching algorithm in crystal structure prediction. The searching algorithm is a hybrid of the evolutionary algorithm and Bayesian optimization. The evolutionary algorithm is widely used in crystal structure prediction, and the Bayesian optimization is one of the selection-type algorithms we have developed. We have performed simulations of crystal structure prediction to compare the success rates of the random search, evolutionary algorithm, Bayesian optimization, and hybrid algorithm for up to ternary systems such as Si, Y2Co17, Al2O3, and CuGaS2, using the CrySPY code. These results demonstrate that the evolutionary algorithm can generate structures more efficiently than random structure generation, and the Bayesian optimization can efficiently select potential candidates from a large number of structures. Moreover, the hybrid algorithm, which has the advantages of both, is proved to be the most efficient searching algorithm among them.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 74
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EVO-Evolutionary algorithm for crystal structure prediction
    Bahmann, Silvia
    Kortus, Jens
    COMPUTER PHYSICS COMMUNICATIONS, 2013, 184 (06) : 1618 - 1625
  • [2] XTALOPT: An open-source evolutionary algorithm for crystal structure prediction
    Lonie, David C.
    Zurek, Eva
    COMPUTER PHYSICS COMMUNICATIONS, 2011, 182 (02) : 372 - 387
  • [3] Time efficiency in optimization with a bayesian-Evolutionary algorithm
    Lan, Gongjin
    Tomczak, Jakub M.
    Roijers, Diederik M.
    Eiben, A. E.
    SWARM AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2022, 69
  • [4] Comparative study of crystal structure prediction approaches based on a graph network and an optimization algorithm
    Yang, Fan
    Cheng, Guanjian
    Yin, Wan-Jian
    SCIENCE CHINA-MATERIALS, 2024, 67 (04) : 1273 - 1281
  • [5] Protein engineering via Bayesian optimization -guided evolutionary algorithm and robotic experiments
    Hu, Ruyun
    Fu, Lihao
    Chen, Yongcan
    Chen, Junyu
    Qiao, Yu
    Si, Tong
    BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS, 2023, 24 (01)
  • [6] A Hybrid Evolutionary Algorithm for Multiobjective Optimization
    Ahn, Chang Wook
    Kim, Hyun-Tae
    Kim, Yehoon
    An, Jinung
    2009 FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIO-INSPIRED COMPUTING: THEORIES AND APPLICATIONS, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 19 - +
  • [7] STRUCTURE LEARNING OF BAYESIAN NETWORKS BASED ON HYBRID EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHM WITH ELITE STRATEGY
    Shi, Jilong
    Zhu, Yungang
    JOURNAL OF NONLINEAR AND CONVEX ANALYSIS, 2021, 22 (09) : 1957 - 1970
  • [8] Hybrid evolutionary algorithm and application to structural optimization
    Z. Fawaz
    Y.G. Xu
    K. Behdinan
    Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2005, 30 : 219 - 226
  • [9] Hybrid evolutionary algorithm for solving optimization problems
    Li, Kangshun
    Li, Wei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER MATHEMATICS, 2007, 84 (11) : 1591 - 1602
  • [10] Hybrid Evolutionary Algorithm for Molecular Geometric Optimization
    Garcia Blanquel, Ericka
    Garcia Blanquel, Claudia
    Luna-Garcia, Rene
    COMPUTACION Y SISTEMAS, 2019, 23 (02): : 569 - 582